zoe and vic
Member
There are so many quotes and ideas in one post that it makes it difficult to nail down a point. Let me focus on one idea, that of continuing revelation. Let's ignore polygamy for this round. I haven't ignored it in other posts, but have expressed my view.
Here's what I hear you saying:
You reject continuing revelation on the basis that God will never reveal a new principle of the gospel or give his people new direction on what they should or should not do, because that would constitute "another gospel" or a "revision of the Holy Spirit". You believe this to be the case, regardless of what the revelation is about. There's no need to examine the revelation and its content, since if it's new information or even further clarification on the Bible, it's "another gospel". You believe that Paul's warning concerning another gospel means that there will be no future prophets, because no matter what a prophet could say, if it's in addition to the Bible, it must be "another gospel".
If that is what you believe, then yes, I believe that is your opinion.
I believe that the gospel of "no further revelation" is not the gospel that is taught in the Bible. Therefore to teach that the scripture canon is closed is to teach "another gospel".
Also, the apostles being sent "last" does not mean that they are the final messengers from God, it simply means that they are the last ones who have come so far or the latest to come.
Before we conclude polygamy consider this:
"Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband."
According to the Word of God... his own and her own is singular. This does not say that the man owns his wife either. It says they own each other. Also it says this is the only way to avoid fornication: they should have themselves to each other; man and wife.
It's not interpretation- it's simply reading a sentence.
If you're not justifying God in your argument then you are justifying man, institutions, theories, and lies. To justify God is to speak the truth of the matter, even at the detriment of your own belief.