• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mohammed

nawab

Active Member
I understand that alot of people are also being converted due to Immigration but we cant deny the fact that Coversions are also due to a deeper understanding of Islam

The below are western Converted Muslims
1) Shoaib Webb
2) Aminah Asslimi
3) Abdur Rahim Green
4) Yusuf Islam (former Cat Stevens)
5) Hamza Yusuf
6) Bilal Phillips
7) Yusuf Estes
These are just those Muslims (who are converted and are scholars) there are so many others.I just know these much without research. If i research there will be plenty now i did not include my friends who are caucasions and are converted muslims, you may challenge me that i am lying. But I dont think how many Sikhs you know that are white and have been converted


How about the U.S. and telling conversions from immigrations from the raw statistics?

Regards,
Scott
 

Popeyesays

Well-Known Member
I understand that alot of people are also being converted due to Immigration but we cant deny the fact that Coversions are also due to a deeper understanding of Islam

The below are western Converted Muslims . . . .

I would never call you a liar, I was just wondering how you can tell the difference, and I do not think you really can for US statistics anyway.

Please note the last paragraph in red about the page. You can find a similar page for Muslims at Famous Adherents: What religion was...? (religious affiliation)


Rulers and Politicians:
- Queen Marie of Romania - first crowned ruler to embrace Baha'i Faith (not officially enrolled, but a Baha'i at heart, whose devotion is expressed in her letters published in Priceless Pearl)
- King Malietoa Tanumafili II - king of Western Samoa
- Cynthia Shepard Perry - US Ambassador to Sierra Leone, West Africa and Burundi during Bush administration
- David Kelly - British Ministry of Defence (MoD); expert in biological warfare; former UN weapons inspector in Iraq; uncovered Iraq's former biological weapons program; Nobel Peace Prize nominee
Music:
- Dizzy Gillespie - Jazz musician (trumpet player)
- Jim Seals and Dash Crofts - "Seals & Crofts" songwriting/musician duo (soft rock); best known for "Summer Breeze" and "Get Closer"; Also: "We May Never Pass This Way Again"
- Charles Wolcott - film composer; former MGM and Disney Studios Music Director; 3 Academy Awards
- Marc Ochu - classical pianist
- Lasse Thoresen - Norwegian classical music composer
- Russell Garcia - film composer whose credits include The Time Machine (1960); orchestrator
- Carol Bernhardt - classical oboist
Film and Television:
- Omid Djalili - ethnic Iranian stand-up comedian and actor in England; has done major U.S.-based acting also, incl. co-starring as "Nasim" on Whoopie (network TV sitcom) and movie roles such as in "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow"
- Earl Cameron - Bermudan born veteran TV/film actor; The Interpreter (2005); Thunderball (1965); The Message (1976); etc.
- O. Z. Whitehead - film and television actor; The Grapes of Wrath (1940), etc.
- Alex Rocco - actor ("The Godfather"; "The Wedding Planner", etc.)
- David Hofman - actor, "Voice of the BBC"
- Carole Lombard - actress, movie star
- Lois Hall - actress
- Eva La Rue - actress
- Oscar DeGruy - actor
- Anthony Azizi - actor (FOX TV series "24", etc.)
- Lloyd Haynes - actor, star of TV series Room 222
- Justin Baldoni - actor; CBS TV movie Spring Break Shark Attack; etc.
- Phillip Hinton - Australian actor; American exposure includes guest roles in The Flood, The Thornbirds - the Missing Years, Tanker Incident, Time Trax and Flipper
- Beverley Evans - Australian actor; has had regular roles in Australian series A Country Practice, Blue Heelers, Janus, Phoenix and Mercury
- Rainn Wilson - actor: Super Ex-Girlfriend (2006); Almost Famous (2000); Galaxy Quest (1999); America's Sweethearts (2001); Sahara (2005); received Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series from Screen Actors Guild Award for Six Feet Under in 2001) [see American Baha'i 23 November 2005]
Sports:
- Cathy Freeman - Olympic gold medal-winning runner; star of 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, Australia; an Aboriginal Australian and advocate of Aboriginal rights
- Khalil Greene - professional baseball player; shortstop for the San Diego Padres
- Bill Sears - sports announcer and TV personality
- Nelson Evora - Portuguese Olympic triple jumper
- Miles Kasiri - English tennis player
Literature:
- Robert Hayden - poet; first black American to be appointed as Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress (later called the Poet Laureate)
- Ogden Nash - poet
- Roger White - poet (Another Song, Another Season: Poems and Portrayals; Occasions of Grace: More Poems and Portrayals and The Witness of Pebbles )
- Maya Kaathryn Bohnhoff - fantasy novelist
- Juliet Thompson - American playwright and author; wrote I, Magdalene
Art: [continue . . . .]0


Regards,
Scott
 

Popeyesays

Well-Known Member
Continue . . . .:
- Mark Tobey - renowned abstract painter; founder of the "New York School" of abstract painting (according to Woodman)
- Duffy Sheridan - painter
- Roger Bansemer - artist
- Bernard Leach - preeminent British potter
- Ashraf Geibatov - Azerbaijani painter
- Sara Hatch - artist
- William Sutherland Maxwell - one of Canada's premier architects and a leading figure in the arts societies of Montreal
- Kevin Locke - Native Amerian hoop dancer
Academics and Non-Fiction Authors:
- Alain Locke - American philosopher; multiculturalist; listed in The Black 100 as the 36th most influential African American in history
- Guy Murchie - writer of science and philosophy books, incl: The Seven Mysteries of Life; Music of the Spheres; Song of the Sky
- Dorothy Marcic - author of Managing with the Wisdom of Love
- Thomas Kelly Cheyne - Biblical scholar; important English language pioneer of the "higher criticism" of the Bible
- August Forel - scientist; b. 1848; remembered primarily for studies of social behavior of ants and other insects; published studies in legal psychiatry, mental health
- Dwight Allen - Professor of Educational Reform at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia; co-author with Bill Cosby of American Schools: The 100 Billion Dollar Challenge
- Linda Kavelin Popov - co-author of The Family Virtues Guide: Simple Ways to Bring Out the Best in Our Children and Ourselves, about teaching spiritual qualities to children, and other books
Activism:
- Suheil Bushrui - scholar; peace activist; holds Baha'i Chair for World Peace at the University of Maryland
- Layli Miller-Muro - founder of The Tahirih Justice Center; helped Fauziya Kassindja gain assylum in U.S.; co-wrote Fauziya's book Do They Hear You When You Cry?
- Patricia Locke - (1928-2001) inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame in 2003, worked for decades to preserve American Indian languages
- Richard St. Barbe-Baker - world-famous environmentalist; founder of "The Men of the Trees" Notable Promoters of the Baha'i Faith:
- Lydia Zamenhof - daughter of Ludwig Lazarus Zamenhof, the originator of Esperanto; promoter and user of Esperanto and translator of many Baha'i writings; a.k.a. Lidia Zamenhof
- Martha Root - celebrated Baha'i speaker, world traveller, and Esperantist
- Louis Gregory - lawyer and influential early Baha'i; first African-American to be named a Hand of the Cause of God. His childhood home in Charleston, SC is now a public museum devoted to his memory and his dedication to the cause of race unity.


About this page:
In January of 2000, Adherents.com was unable to locate a "Famous Baha'is" web page anywhere on the Internet. As we have done for other groups without such a page (Quakers, Baptists, Zoroastrians, etc.), we made our own. One of the major sources for this information was A Resource Guide for Baha'i Studies (A Resource Guide for Baha'i Studies--bibliography). Another was the Believers webpage (http://members.ozemail.com.au/~lingua/main.htm; URL no longer valid). Also, some names were from the Vizier Baha'i website formerly at: http://www.vizier.bahai.nl/geschiedenis.html.

Regards,
Scott
 

Mujahid Mohammed

Well-Known Member
Just because there are Christians who twist the scriptures to meet their needs does not make it OK. It also does not make it OK (IMO of course) for Muslims to do the same.
I agree with you but as a muslim I don't think we try to twist it. For we do not know which context to take based on the verses contained.

It just there are so many christians with different ideologies that if we side with one meaning we try to look at it from one group of Christianity perspective. We would disagree and sound like we are twisting with another. If we take the side of the baptist as being the correct understanding or context of the religion when presenting the side of christianity to a catholic, seventh day adventis, mormon, JW etc we will disagree.

So who is twisting it and who is not. Not from our perspective but yours as christians? What is the correct understanding? Is Jesus God? Is He the son of God only? Is He the part of three all coexisting as one entity yet seperate? communion? Deeds are not neccessary just faith? Baptizm? Communion? Popes? Saints? Holiday pagan or not? Who is correct who is doing what Jesus said and who is not? Who is the true followers of Christ for everyone cannot be correct?

So what do we do as muslims, We use the Quran as the canon, or measurement to find out the truth in it because the christians make it hard for us to sort it out, no fault of any christians present today or on this forum. Allah says things were mentioned in earlier scriptures but people changed it and altered it. Surah Maidah (5):13,:41. Just read the whole surah if you can from the 1st to 41st.

and the same premise is also illustrated in the bible, in Jeremiah 8:8 and by many scholars church authorities and authors. theologians and sestagents. And the highest of scholarly church and academic authority.

and it's really not that we say it is invalid. It is altered and changed. And these changes were not authorized by God or Jesus. Just random no name scribes according to some of the church and christian scholars and historians. This is what they say, so what are we as muslims to think? If Church fathers, theolgians and other biblical authorities from early christian history to the present are saying that it is altered. And the Quran is telling us it is altered, and the bible says that the Jews altered the text again what are we supposed to think? I am not sure again I apologize I do not want to sound condemning

Why do you feel it necessary to affirm your prophet to Christians by finding characteristics of him in a Bible which you otherwise find 'invalid?' So far, the only Biblical mentions I've found predicting the arrival of prophets like Muhammed is in passages such as this one...
Is not the one you found sufficient? How many verses do you need to believe that he is mentioned? If it says he is mentioned and you say you found one. Is that not an evidence that the Quran speaks the truth. Wait, don't answer that lol! You may look at this as I am trying to make you say something, very misleading I am sorry. I am not trying to make you say that lol:) And I apologize if you feel I or muslims need to affirm Prophet Muhammed in the bible. I really do not need to as a muslim. And I think sometimes in us trying to show you something as far as what we believe in the Quran and Sunnah. We forget the etiquettes of delivering the Message or the etiquettes of dawah which is illustrated for us in our religion. So I apologize. It is easy to cast blame on my fellow brothers and christians, They say this they say that. But what am I doing? I hope that in what I am going to say that you look at it as not an attack on belief. But just a transfer of information and ideology based on of the scriptural evidence at least from my perspective and others who. So that perhaps maybe together we can bridge the gap of misunderstanding concerning this issue and find a way to discuss without beating each other down. Again please do not look at this as an attack or me twisting things for because of the subject matter it is hard to know who to follow so I will let the Christians sort it out.

Now the reason muslims look for these types of things is because the Quran tells us that he and his characteristics have been mentioned in the previous scriptures. So as muslims when we read verses like in the Gen 21:21 where Abraham took Ishmael and Hagar and made a settlement in Mecca, called Paran in bible. the well of Zam Zam is mentioned in Gen 21:19. And this is something known in our Islamic history so we look at it as truth.

We also read in the criterion of the Prophet of Jeremiah 28:9 about the prophet of peace and Islam signifies that for us as muslims, so we believe since it is Islam and Muhammed is its prophet we believe this verse could be talking about Muhammed as this particular individual. And because of the statements of Jesus in Luke 12:51-53 we say this is not associated with him

We also read about Shiloh, concerning the message of Jacob to his children before he died in Gen 49:1, when he tells them about the last days. Gen 49:10 how the scepter will not depart until shiloh comes and everyone will gather to him. Liguistically shiloh means tranquility or peace. So Israelite prophethood would stop when shiloh comes. Like in Surah Baqarah 2:133 in the Quran: "Were you witnessess when death came to Jacob? When he said to his sons, What will you worship after me?" They said, "We shall worship Allah, the God of you fathers Abraham, Ishmael, and Ishaq, One God and to Him we surrender [in Islam].

The shift was also mentioned in Jeremiah 31:36 and Jesus hinted to it in Matthew 21:43, "therefore say I unto you, the kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."

so when we look at the lineage of Prophethood through Abraham and the inheritants of his two sons as described in Gen. the succession of Prophethood for Israel was lost but at what point? It had to be after Jesus, and since Jesus never said another Prophet wouldn't come after him we cannot say prophet Muhammed is a false prophet. But since Jesus gave us the signs to recognize a false prophet we use it as a measurement. But why would we need to recognize signs of a false prophet if Jesus is it. If He was it then He would have said no one is coming after me. At least that what I think again you know I could be wrong but if Jesus didn't say no one was coming after him then I cannot say it for him and assume that everyone coming after him is false. I will know him by the signs.

We read things like Baca is Mecca in Surah 3:96 Bacca is mentioned, as is Mecca methioned in Surah 48:24. The two are synonymous in the Quran. And it is mentioned also by Prophet Dawood alaihi salam in Psalm 84:6. When it mentions the valley of Baca and a well. What is the well in Mecca. Zam Zam of courxe.

Isaiah chapter 60 describes the house of glory beautiful verses.

1. Arise, shine for thy light is come and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee. compare with Surah 74:1-3 O you [Muhammed] wrapped up in garments! Arise and warn! And your Lord magnify!"

2. For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth and gross darkness the people, but the Lord shall arise upon thee,... Advent of Muhammed was at a time of darkness when the world forgot the Oneness of God as taught by Abraham, Moses and all other Prophets including Jesus.

3. "And the Gentiles shall come to thy light and kings to the brightness of thy rising.." Lift up thine eyes round about, and see all they gather themselves together, they come to thee..." Within 23 years the whole of Arabia was united under Islam by an illiterate shepard.

4. "...because the abundance of the sea shall be converted unto thee, the forces of Gentiles shall come unto thee." Within a century Islam took over 2/3 of the world

5. "The multitude of camels shall cover thee, the dromedaries of Midian and Ephah, all they from sheba shall come, they shall bring gold and incense;... "All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee, they shall come up with acceptance on mine alter, and I will glorify the house of my glory." The tribes of Kedar who is Kedar the bible teaches us in Gen 13 that Kedar is a decendant of Ishmael who settled in the land of Paran or Mecca which bible again confirms. so if we look at the statements made by the bible. the house of my glory refers to the House of Allah in Mecca and not the church of christ. It is a fact that the villages of Kedar (Arabia especially holy cities) has not been influenced by the Church. And was always under the religious decrees of the Quran and sunnah.

6. therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall not be shut day nor night; they men may bring unto thee the foreces of the Gentiles, and that their kings may be brought." It is a fact that the mosque surrounding the Holy Ka'bah in Mecca has remained open day and night since it was cleansed by Prophet Muhammed peace be upon him from the idols 1400 years ago. Rulers as well as subjects came for Pilgrimage.
 

Mujahid Mohammed

Well-Known Member
We also read in Isaiah in 21:7 "And he saw a chariot of with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a chariot of camels;..." Who was the rider upon an ***? I was always taught as a former christian that it was Jesus, John 12:14.

Who is the promised rider upon a camel? What prophet rode a camel? Who is this powerful Prophet associated with Jesus that has been overlooked? We as muslims know that out of all the ambiyat Muhammed was the one who rode the camel. If it doesn't apply to him then it has yet to be fulfilled. We believe this is why Isaiah mentioned further in the same chap. 21:13" the burden upon Arabia..." whose burden? who came from Arabia?

Isaiah 21:14 also talks about the land of Tema. And gen 25:13-15 mention a man named Tema. decendant of who? Ishmeal alaihis salam. Where and who is Tema?

According to the J. Hastings Dictionary of the bible Tema is an Oasis just north of Madinah

In the dictionary bearing the Nihil Obstat, Imprimatur, and Imprimi Potest (official church seals of approval), by John McKenzi, we read that Tema is "a place name and tribal name of Arabia; son of Ishmael...the name survives in Teima, an oasis of the part of the Arabian desert called the Nefud in N Central Arabia."

Isaiah 21:16-17 "for thus hath the Lord said unto me, Within a year, according to the years of an hireling, and all the glory of Kedar shall fail. And the residue of the number of archers, the mighty men of the children of kedar, shall be diminished: for the Lord God of Israel hath spoken [it]." Kedar when did Kedar fall? As muslims if we look at verses 14-15 when they talk about the inhabitants from Tema bringing water to someone, and then a within a year the mighty men of Kedar will fall. From our history if we interpret what Tema is according to the biblical and church authority references. When the inhabitants of medina made the covenant with the Messeger He moved to Medinah. they gave him shelter, support, food and water of course. Everyday someon was bringing something to him. Within one year the first meeting between the Kufar of Quraish and the Muslims was at the Battle of Badr. where the most noble of Quraish. the leaders of the major most noble tribes were killed. so we say this is a prophecy about Muhammed.

Now there are other verses we interpret as such, and I cannot speak for all muslims but I interpret the bible according to what the bible says. It is written in english so the context should be taken as such. I look at what it says and try to get an understanding for what it means. Now there are places where i feel reconciliation should be made in order for me to have a complete understanding but those issues are for the Christians themselves to sort out. I am muslim and the Quran is sufficient for me as an evidence. I really do not need the bible but since Allah says that He is mentioned. We are going to look for it from what you have. Now is what you have the original without any alterations. Well that's another issue for them to sort out as well.

I apologize if it seems I am twisting the text. Again as a former christian there are things I didn't understand and have never gotten a good clear answer from my parents or church leaders so I decided to look at what the scholars and university heads and church authorities said and became quite perplexed and the evermounting stack of evidence being brought about the manipulation of scripture. So depending on the ideology you accept and whose idea on what it is you accept or what teacher or scholar you agree with it is what it is. I don't know what to think or what to believe to be absolute truth in christiantiy and its hard to see truth based on the evidence given in the bible, scriptural history, and church dogma according to authorities you have.

I guess everyone does it. But it is not my intention. Maybe that is something that should be analyzed. whose context is correct based on what you have? and how do we reconcile the issues that are raised dealing with the text variation.

In Islam we do not have that we have the Quran and Sunnah and they are clear. If one studies and learns it is easy to find the context and methodology to follow. One way. the way of Rasullulah and how his companions understood and obeyed him. Take it easy.
 

Mujahid Mohammed

Well-Known Member
Fair enough.
However you are still ignoring the fact that without the original you cannot verify that the copy matches the original.
Sorry been away for a while but to answer you. We have the sunnah and what was laid down by the companions. If something other then what they took from him came it was recognized and gotten rid of. Plus they made it through the text that everyone would have to recite it the way he did so no alteration can be done.

Non Sequitur argument

Then why the need to put it in book form to begin with, if it is memorized?
People forget. Adam forgot so the children of Adam will forget. Many of the Hafiz died in a ghazwat. Plus they were expanding and many wanted copies to learn it. So how do they get it?

What?
You contradicted yourself with what is actually written here.
I suspect a typo.
Please clarify either way.
What I was saying is basically what puff daddy and others do to old songs. they take and old songs and make it their own because they change it. Now if the verses, instruments used everything is the same it can be a different singer but sitll same song.


you are now confusing me with someone else.
Or making assumptions from what I have stated.
I am talking about the fact that the 'original' quran, the leafs, shoulder bones, etc, is not available for you to compare your copy to, so you have no way of knowing if any of the copies copied from the 'original copy' match the 'original' writing on the leafs, shoulder bones, etc.
All you can prove is whether or not the copy you have matches the 'original copy' but not the 'original' writings.
Rather convient, wouldn't you say, that the 'original' writings were ordered destroyed?
Why order the original writings destroyed, if not to prevent them from being viewed?
No the ones created by others that those put out by the Khalifa were destroyed the one who walked with the prophet and heard him recite the Quran. Yeah anything other then what he took from the prophet was destroyed because some in their writing changed the dialect and meaning through incorrect recitation.

Yet Muslims are posting about how verse such and such from the Bible is talking about Mohammed.
If Muslims did not support this position of that particular interpretation of those verses from the Bible, why bother with all the threads that make such a claim?
Not sure why everyone tries to prove it. It is something stated in the Quran. I put up a post recently about this that clarifies it possibly why. it was in response to something snowbear said about it. Again we don't need it but I guess muslims are trying to prove the validity of the Quran to those who do not believe in it. Their intention is good but perhaps the approach is off possibly. I don't know, but it looks plausible.

Take it easy will be gone for a while so may take me a while to get back with you. Sorry if I have been crass with you recently or in the past it was not my intention. I ask Allah to forgive me. Take care. Peace.
 

Mujahid Mohammed

Well-Known Member
There's 2 facts, you need to get straight, concerning me, MM.

Firstly, I'm not a Christian, :no: despite having a nic, called "Gnostic". I'm an agnostic.
My bad. I do apologize.

Agnosticism have little to do with Christianity, or any other theists for that matter, including Islam and Judaism. Nor is agnosticism is atheism. I hoped that I don't have to explain what agnosticism is, MM.
No I used to be one.

So please, don't wave your finger :tsk: at me, and saying that "You're a Christian". Beside, has you mother ever told you that it is rude to point finger.
That wasn't my intention, I did not mean you as a christian but more the christian premise on that particular issue. Again I do apologize.

, in my reply, I have in no way place emphasis on my interpretation of any OT passage to that of the person - Jesus or Christ, or whatever you want to call him. I have different argument with Christians, most often on the topic of Creation and Creationism. I don't play favouritism.
got ya!

My outlook on the quoted passages is my own, and my interpretation is my own, free from Christian interpretation. I had read your Muslim interpretation as well as the sources, the source in which case is chapter 29 of Isaiah. These interpretation are based on my experiences in reading and studying literatures of mythology; I did not use or base my interpretation on this RF's topic on the works (such as books, articles or essays) of Christian, Jewish or Muslim authors. I used only what I can see and read, and no Christians are involved when I wrote my replies.

You can use whatever translation that you want, because it make no difference to me. I am arguing on the interpretation on text, based on yours and my opinions. Dragging the issuse of the Bible as a corrupted text or man-made is actually a childish response that have no bearing on Isaiah 29, and will have no impact whatsoever on me.
Maybe you misunderstood my intention as to convert you or something. if that's the case I do apologize i am only giving the information. the guidance is from Allah.

To me, your Qur'an is also man-made, regardless of Muhammad or any Muslim claim that these are words of Allah, but this is also not the issue.
you are entitled to your opinion and I agree it is not the issue.

The topic is about Muhammad in the Hebrew and Christian scriptures. But I have no interest in discussing NT literature or Christianity, and so far I have only looked and discussed OT passages or matters, here.
Okay? No problem, so do not discuss it. Who is discussing it? Muslims claim he is mentioned Christians say he is not. But changes is relevant to him being in there or not. For what if they took him out through the alteration. but again for us it is not necessary we have the Quran. but again the approach could have been wrong. Mine has been in the past.

Insha Allah I will get better take care. Be away for a while
 

nawab

Active Member
Now there have been some issues regarding the Quran that it is man made, anything manmade contains default in it, like anything created by men like TV, radio these things can be faulty because they are man made.

For The Quran, the best way to prove the Quran is man made is to find one Scientific error, Gramatical error, contradiction within itself or with modern science, anything of these kinds just produce one error and we are all open for corrections but dont put false allegations. I strongly would like to inform some of my non-muslim brothers that to understand the Quran directly you need to have a good understand of the Arabic language. English is too inferior to produce the same exact to exact meaning of the Arabic word e.g. the word Alaq means a leech like substances, you see one word arabic for 3 words in english, Bi ism allah 3 words in arabic and in english in the name of Allah (5 words english) the quran cannot be completely translated to english, however the translations are just the message of God not exactly the words of God. I am just asking people to proof to me one error in the Quran for a change. I gladly await your response.

the verbal reciting and a written form is necessary like the judges they remember the Law but they also have it in a written form for reference. I might argue that no there is no Bismillah in the quran and my brother will argue there is, how do we tell. so the written is like a written constituation but in case you dont have a wriiten form with you you can also verbally recite it for reference but in case os a disagreement A written form would be cross checked. these are just for convinence i dont understand what the problem is. the miracle here is any muslim in the world you wake him up during the night when he is in deep sleep and you ask him to recite the Surah Faithiya (1st chapter) he will correctly recite word for word.

Alot of non muslims have this misconception that the oldest quran was destroyed so there is no way of knowing what the real quran is as i said if this Quran is not the real it should contain mistakes errors and contradictions which so far no one as been able to show me.

The real story was the old qurans and this qurans were exactly the same but in Arabia different tribes have different arabic dialets so the way the heard it they wrote the Vowel points, like for AL how to we pronounce it AAL, AEL, AOL, if you understand Arabic or any language like Persian, Urdu you will know what i am saying. so it was made into the dialect of the Meccan Qurash, Bani Hasham for the pronounciation for the non-arabs, Arabs can read the quranb without vowel points but for non arabs this was made into a standard one, which is available in Istanbul, Turkey you can check for your self word for word.
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
For The Quran, the best way to prove the Quran is man made is to find one Scientific error, Gramatical error, contradiction within itself or with modern science, anything of these kinds just produce one error
So any book ever written that can claim these things is truly from God?
 

nawab

Active Member
Yes if the book claims it is from God and is free from contradiction, Scientific Error, absurdies, promoting good over evil.
 

Popeyesays

Well-Known Member
So I could write such a book?

I think the point is that the standard is so high no one can write such a book BETTER or even as good as the Qur'an which was given to Muhammed through the presence of Gasbriel from God Himself.

I can point to The (Arabic) Hidden Words and say that this is directly from God to man, and I doubt any Muslims would agree with me, because it would run counter to their personal beliefs. If a Muslim should read the Hidden Words and determine that that book was direct from God, that individual would no longer be a Muslim in good conscience.

Regards,
Scott
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
First you write and then we will judge, this is my personal challenge to you that you will not be able to write any book like that.
So it is sorta like American Idol?

You judge not the content, but how well you deem my written performance to be?
 

nawab

Active Member
I know the best wriiter in the world be a mulsim or not a muslim wont be able to produce a book like that, What the creater has authored, what is man, man is like a worm as mentioned in the bible. Job 25:4-6 Job 25:4-6 (KING JAMES)
How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman? Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not; yea, the stars are not pure in his sight. How much less man, that is a worm? and the son of man, which is a worm?
 

nawab

Active Member
Oh Sorry i forgot you were a roman catholic here is the New International Version The Catholic one,
How then can a man be righteous before God? How can one born of woman be pure? If even the moon is not bright and the stars are not pure in his eyes, how much less man, who is but a maggot— a son of man, who is only a worm

The King James was supposed to be a Protestant bible.
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
I know the best wriiter in the world be a mulsim or not a muslim wont be able to produce a book like that, What the creater has authored, what is man, man is like a worm as mentioned in the bible. Job 25:4-6 Job 25:4-6 (KING JAMES)
How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman? Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not; yea, the stars are not pure in his sight. How much less man, that is a worm? and the son of man, which is a worm?
Huh?

You are going to quote the Bible to ME? :shrug:

Oy vey.... thanks for trying to explain your beliefs.

Peace be with you.
 

nawab

Active Member
and on you to peace be

Beleive me brother, I am a student of comparitive religion, with the help of Allah, i have gained alot of knowledge in religion , especially in Islam, Christianity and Hinduism. I would be a fit person to quote from the bible. I have studied it. I have involed in Dawah services which is like a MIssionary/evanglism a muslim version. I have engaged with many Christian Missionaries in discussions.

Just tell me if it is in the bible or not. If i am wrong i am open for corrections. Your expressions is like i can quote from the bible, Am i not fit.
 

McBell

Resident Sourpuss
Sorry been away for a while but to answer you. We have the sunnah and what was laid down by the companions. If something other then what they took from him came it was recognized and gotten rid of. Plus they made it through the text that everyone would have to recite it the way he did so no alteration can be done.

Non Sequitur argument

People forget. Adam forgot so the children of Adam will forget. Many of the Hafiz died in a ghazwat. Plus they were expanding and many wanted copies to learn it. So how do they get it?

What I was saying is basically what puff daddy and others do to old songs. they take and old songs and make it their own because they change it. Now if the verses, instruments used everything is the same it can be a different singer but sitll same song.


No the ones created by others that those put out by the Khalifa were destroyed the one who walked with the prophet and heard him recite the Quran. Yeah anything other then what he took from the prophet was destroyed because some in their writing changed the dialect and meaning through incorrect recitation.

Not sure why everyone tries to prove it. It is something stated in the Quran. I put up a post recently about this that clarifies it possibly why. it was in response to something snowbear said about it. Again we don't need it but I guess muslims are trying to prove the validity of the Quran to those who do not believe in it. Their intention is good but perhaps the approach is off possibly. I don't know, but it looks plausible.

Take it easy will be gone for a while so may take me a while to get back with you. Sorry if I have been crass with you recently or in the past it was not my intention. I ask Allah to forgive me. Take care. Peace.
The fact still remains that you do not have the original writings to present to back up your claim that the current matches the original.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
newab said:
Now there have been some issues regarding the Quran that it is man made, anything manmade contains default in it, like anything created by men like TV, radio these things can be faulty because they are man made.
A book that contain no faults with grammars or contradiction, doesn't mean the book is written by God or Yahweh or Allah or whatever you want to call him.

Contradiction doesn't mean one way or another the authorship being divine or not.

It's not the contradiction that I find fault with your book. It's the "contents" that I find fault. You have a book, like Qur'an contained myths and fables. As much as I loved myths, trying to prove them to be true is where I draw the line.

Then there the nonsense of Solomon having armies of demons and djinns, his ability to speak to animals, and control weather, showed that Muhammad would compose such fables in the Qur'an, prove that Muhammad believed in fairytales.

Qur'an 21:78-82 said:
78 And David and Solomon, when they gave judgment concerning the field, when people's sheep had strayed and browsed therein by night; and We were witnesses to their judgment.
79 And We made Solomon to understand (the case); and unto each of them We gave judgment and knowledge. And we subdued the hills and the birds to hymn (His) praise along with David. We were the doers (thereof).
80 And We taught him the art of making garments (of mail) to protect you in your daring. Are ye then thankful ?
81 And unto Solomon (We subdued) the wind in its raging. It set by his command toward the land which We had blessed. And of everything We are Aware.
82 And of the evil ones (subdued We unto him) some who dived (for pearls) for him and did other work, and We were warders unto them.


Qur'an 27:15-18 said:
15 And We verily gave knowledge unto David and Solomon, and they said: Praise be to Allah, Who hath preferred us above many of His believing slaves!
16 And Solomon was David's heir. And he said: O mankind! Lo! we have been taught the language of birds, and have been given (abundance) of all things. This surely is evident favour.
17 And there were gathered together unto Solomon his armies of the jinn and humankind, and of the birds, and they were set in battle order;
18 Till, when they reached the Valley of the Ants, an ant exclaimed: O ants! Enter your dwellings lest Solomon and his armies crush you, unperceiving.


Tell me, newab.

Do you seriously believe that Solomon could talk to ants and that the ants could talk to Solomon?

No such nonsense was written in the bible about Solomon controlling djinns, or talking to animals. Solomon gaining wisdom from God is one thing, but Solomon can do all these things in the Qur'an that I found questionable.


As I said, it is not "contradictions" that make think the Qur'an is man-made; it is the "contents" that make me think the Qur'an is man-made. I don't believe in the miracles of Moses or Jesus, what make you think I will believe in the miracles of Solomon, according to Muhammad's version.
 
Top