true blood said:
Lin, I say it was Judas' property. Purchased with the money he stole from "the bag".
Thank you Trueblood, at least someone is willing to give it a shot.
My answer is also not really directed at you even though you are the only believer to give me an answer.
It is not directed at you because I know how you view Biblical verse and you are not who I intend to discuss it with for this reason.
You do not claim Biblical inerrancy.
I`m not saying I don`t want your input because I do, I`m just saying your understanding of Biblical verse is not the understanding I wish to comprehend.
I already understand why you believe what you believe about the verse from previous debates.
That being said I`ll tell you your answer is a good one, perhaps the best I know of.
But, it`s not good enough.
Mat 27:5-9
And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.
And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.
And they took counsel, and bought with them the potter's field, to bury strangers in.
Wherefore that field was called, The field of blood, unto this day.
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;
Unless of course there was also a sleazy real estate agent who sold the priests Potters field after Judas hung ..er fell..umm..hung himself..even though this sleazy agent didn`t own it but claimed it after the death of Judas.
Hey Look!
I can harmonize!!
This is a direct contradiction for a couple of reason even if there was a sleazy real estate agent.
Acts 1:18- 19
Now this man (Judas) purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.
Truebloods harmonization doesn`t work regardless of how slimy a real estate agent might be because when Judas made the deal to betray Jesus with the priests the price agreed on was 30 pieces of silver.
Mat 26:15
And said [unto them], What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver.
When Judas threw the money back at the priests they picked up 30 pieces of silver.
Mat 27:9
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;
Judas stole nothing
Please forgive the stereotype but I doubt a group of Jewish priests would have "Overpaid" Judas in the first place.
The people I would really like to hear answer this conundrum are those who have been accusing me of splitting hairs.
Because that would be a really entertaining piece of hypocrisy to witness.