I see no particular reason or evidence to believe free will exists so I default to non-belief. Your other questions seem aimed at those that do believe it exists so…
Whether or not it was Assad, an overzealous general or the rebels using sarin gas is beside the point. The attack means he's either using them or he's losing control over them, either way it's important that we seize control of or destroy the chemical weapons one way or another.
As it turns out...
Think about it this way, you've got parents who know what they're doing, parents who aren't even aware there's a problem and most parents I would think are somewhere in-between. Which is to say they're concerned about it but they not technically minded enough to know what to do about it...
What it definitely is is a big waste of everyone's time. Kids learn how to get around filtering systems in school, if their parents arent actively monitoring their internet usage theres no way to stop them accessing anything they want. If they are, then such a filter is a waste of time...
The problem is that atheism itself is extremely broad. An atheist can be said to be anyone who lacks a belief in any sort of God. That includes people who make the positive claim that God does not exist, the people (like me) who say theres simply not enough evidence to conclude that God does...
Of course we don't actually know how many other planets might have complex life on them, such life evolving could just be 'another day in the office' as far as the universe is concerned.
Hell, we could even discover that most other life in the universe is far more complex than us. I could just...
Yeah I can back this too, I've been having a debate with a Muslim from Pakistan for almost a year now, including about the validity of this guys work, which is essentially imported intelligent design.
I hope so. They are pretty conservative but then it's obvious the way the wind is blowing these days. It's just a pity society seems to need that pressure before doing what's right.
Well thats kind of useless then. It would be better to know how many want to leave illegal prostitution as compared to legal prostitution; I should think its obvious that few people want to be in illegal prostitution.
Youd need to know why they feel they cant leave the profession...
But thats not exactly true is it? They could leave the legal occupation and go join up with the illegal one. Presumably they dont do that because they see the legal occupation as better.
Ok, Ive stared at that question for about 5 minutes now and I cant interpret it.
Exactly. The law...
If they can’t escape legal prostitution then the removal (or non-existence) of legal prostitution means they’ll be forced into illegal prostitution because they have no other option. It’s a worse situation no matter how you look at it, although you might at least be hiding...
This can only become a problem if its allowed to. If legal brothels are being used for child trafficking, drug abuse etc then you have a problem with enforcement of the law, not the concept of the brothels themselves.
The problem here is youre talking about two different things. Theres no...
Could be government run, or it could be privately owned. As long as regulation applies it doesn't matter much.
I would think someone with a background in management would be more suitable.
Depends on how you set it up. If they're government run then no, unless the government was selling it...