• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recent content by mnemonicTonic

  1. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    That's the thing, you are not awake. To be awake means to perceive.You don't perceive reality, your mind conceives it.
  2. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    Are you not able to have a conversation with another entity in a dream? Is it not possible for different entities to have conversation's with themselves? I don't see how you can extrapolate a real entity from an imaginative one.
  3. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    You are not aware of reality, I hope you realize this. You are only conceiving it with your mind. Again, You don't perceive reality! You conceive it! No matter how objective we try to be in our observations and judgments we must remember we are still subjective-entities.
  4. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    How are you certain you are not dreaming right now? Can you justify a true belief that you are not? You just contradicted yourself. Objectivity cannot be subjective! real != imaginative
  5. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    If you can satisfy your senses in a dream, would that be reality? I don't have issues with a concieved-reality state.
  6. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    Welcome to the subjective world! :cool:
  7. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    Intersubjective verifiability is a subjective interpretation. :no:
  8. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    They can be two-entities in a collective-subjective state experiencing identical realities. Yes. It is happening right now. Both are imaginary, so what is the point?
  9. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    No matter how objective we try to be in our observations and judgments we must remember we are still subjective-entities.
  10. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    How do we know objects exist if we conceive reality and not perceive it? We might perceive objects with our senses, but we don't know it until we conceive that notion in our minds. Can you think of an argument that suggests we even have perceiving-senses? You take a leap of faith right there...
  11. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    It is not a fail, you fail for not understanding the notion. You can't be an irreligious-atheist and not have a lack of belief in a concept. You are contradicting yourself.
  12. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    You can't denote "Little is left to the imagination", if all you do is conceive reality.
  13. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    I tend to disagree. There is still a plausible perceived state where we would run amok beyond our wildest dreams.
  14. mnemonicTonic

    Faith is necessary for Science to function

    But your Atheism doesn't pertain to a lack of belief. Does it? How do you define an unbelief? Why do you resist being called a religious-atheist? Do you prefer copypasta instead? I sometimes grow tired of repeating the same thing.
Top