Yes, when one story is published that comprimises national security, and is possibly illegal(or at the very least, their sources are guilty as sin), the publisher should not only be demonized, but threatened prosecution if they fail to release their source to the government.
You HAVE to be...
yes, honest and just.
We intend to help resolve the issue to a just and right conclusion, not a conclusion of appeasment, fear, and international peer pressure.
Fair yes, even handed no. I had a great basketball coach tell me once....."Kevin, as a coach you do not treat each player...
In my mind, the "no atheists in foxholes" saying means more about the human psyche than it does about conceit that Christians are right. Bill, i think a good majority of people, when faced with death, kick into eternal survival mode, just IN CASE.
I guess we will find out some day what...
Yes, but only if they truly want to. You can lead a horse to water, but you cant make him drink.
I dont think it is justice, it is self defense.
Who says? You can not be an honest broker when you do not have 2 sides truly willing for mediation and peace.
Even conceeding that what you posted is...
Ny times were the first to run with the story. Sorry Maggie, I need you to back up your statement that these were probable illegal activities. Can you support that statement at all?
What do they consider an abnormal situation? Are the people in Guantanamo American citizens? No, they are alleged illegal combatants in a war against our country. Why should we afford them US citizen rights?
I seem to remember a great thread in which AE took the position that Judges who "Legislate from the bench" should not be appointed to the supreme court.