• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recent content by Falvlun

  1. Falvlun

    Form vs Action

    I think you may be mixing your metaphors. A photon is both particle and wave, yes. But if the particle disappears, the wave also disappears because they are two aspects of the same entity. As for the person, of course the person still exists even if he moves out of my sensory range. But, if...
  2. Falvlun

    If an entity offered you as an atheist an after life after you lived, would that interest you

    yeah, but the question Scott asked was whether you could conceive of *any* eternal existence you’d like. How do you know meaningful existence would be exhausted? In my scenario, I hypothesized that at the ultimate end of experience, you merge with a universal consciousness, just enjoying the...
  3. Falvlun

    Form vs Action

    So like I said— “if you mean appearance...” are you saying “actions” are “substance”?
  4. Falvlun

    Evil

    I think evil is intentional cruelty; and as such, it must be a purely human creation. Nature is ambivalent— it doesn’t do anything out of a sense of good or evil, right or wrong. Thus, while it may be cruel, it is not intentionally so, and therefore, not evil. Neither do I believe evil is...
  5. Falvlun

    Form vs Action

    What do you mean by form? If you mean “appearance”, then I’m not sure what the mystery is. It’s easier to appear than to do. If it weren’t hard to do good, then we wouldn’t be so constantly surprised and impressed when we see or hear about people doing good things.
  6. Falvlun

    If an entity offered you as an atheist an after life after you lived, would that interest you

    You don’t remember every experience from childhood now but you still consider yourself you. Personally, I like the idea of eternal reincarnation, with a period of reflection, memory, and relaxation in between each life. You could experience what it’s like to be an protozoan or a prince and...
  7. Falvlun

    If an entity offered you as an atheist an after life after you lived, would that interest you

    Is this just lack of imagination? The question was “can you conceive of an eternal existence you want” but you chose only to answer about “eternal bliss without end”. Perhaps your preferred eternal existence requires change and, perhaps, suffering.
  8. Falvlun

    If an entity offered you as an atheist an after life after you lived, would that interest you

    Heck yeah. Really don’t understand the people who are all like “no thanks”. I don’t know what happens when we die but I’m pretty sure it’s nothing and that really sucks. I don’t want to cease to exist. So basically being given an option to continue existence is a no brainer to me. For those...
  9. Falvlun

    Atheism is a RELIGION

    I realized I got stuck on your language and didn’t go on to address your meaning. I do think your non-acceptance, as you describe it, is a belief— the belief that you have insufficient reason to believe this man’s claim. But more to your point, does it constitue a belief that the gumballs are...
  10. Falvlun

    Atheism is a RELIGION

    I don’t think we can say that a common way of speaking is incorrect. Language is determined by how it’s used; not about some perfect concept of logic or even communication. You say it’s “just wrong linguistically”. According to whom? Wouldn’t the people who speak the language be the ultimate...
  11. Falvlun

    Theism, Agnosticism, & Atheism: Which Is Logically The Weakest?

    Wondering when someone would bring this up! :D I think I have some wiggle room here. Wiki describes as follows: “In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "argument to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition must be true because many or most...
  12. Falvlun

    Theism, Agnosticism, & Atheism: Which Is Logically The Weakest?

    Nope. A courthouse is one of the things I’m thinking of. Two witnesses are better than one. Why? Because it makes their testimony more believable. Plausible doesn’t mean true.
  13. Falvlun

    Theism, Agnosticism, & Atheism: Which Is Logically The Weakest?

    Already posted the definition. To recap: “the quality of seeming reasonable or probable”. Please note “seeming”. “Believable” is a synonym for “plausible”— check a thesaurus. Believable closely conveys the sense in which I’m using the word “plausible”.
  14. Falvlun

    Theism, Agnosticism, & Atheism: Which Is Logically The Weakest?

    The very original post that started this train of thought used “plausibility”, not evidence, claiming that both fairies and gods were equally plausible. I make a distinction between the two. I think “the number of believers makes something more plausible” is a slam dunk, irrefutable...
  15. Falvlun

    Theism, Agnosticism, & Atheism: Which Is Logically The Weakest?

    I actually deleted that from the post, sorry I didn’t catch the edit in time.
See more
Top