Since I don't view the Bible as an authoritative source of information on Jesus' life or the way the world is or will be in time to come, these verses hold no significance for me.
But, for the sake of the argument, if we take your earlier figures as a given, that means some 50% (or more) of Muslims don't want Sharia law. Ergo they don't have a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam, so on this argument, I don't think we can say that all Islam is totalitarian.
800 million might say they do (this figure is obviously an extrapolation from survey data) but the number who actually understand the implications for them and their families and would really want to live under Sharia law is likely to be fewer (not least given that few Muslims really understand...
Perhaps because they are in the minority/have to in order to comply with the law/expectations within their country? Give them the power they desire, and things might turn out rather differently.
I'm not sure fairly clear is clear enough here, though. I'd suggest inserting the word 'fundamentalist' before your every reference to manifestations of Islam or Muslims that you have issues with.
Very few of these governments have adopted Sharia law in its entirety, though. Indeed, many fundamentalist Muslims attack their governments for their corruption and for not being (truly) religious.
Perhaps you should make clearer in your posts that it is fundamentalist Islam and the actions of fundamentalist Muslims that you have a (justified) problem with.
Islam at its worst does indeed have a significant impact on many people (mostly Muslims). But far from all manifestations of Islam as interpreted and practiced by (many) other Muslims have these kinds of negative impacts.
I pretty much agree. But it would be pretty easy to lie just in order to get in. So I'm not sure how practical this would be in limiting the entry of the kinds of people you want to stop from entering the country.