1. Don't edit my words and leave them in quotes. That is called lying.
2. You are obviously having difficulty seeing the difference between the two arguments and beyone that, you seem to be ignoring the fact that the scriptures you continue repeating will not apply to the question no matter...
[/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE]
:biglaugh: are you kidding? This is exactly what I mean about fanciful interpretation.
Let's pretend your fanciful interpretation is once again correct, it STILL does not mean there was an end to the Apostles, only and end to things being sent...
Not to anyone who understands it. :rolleyes:
Feel free to educate yourself a bit about circular logic (from an easy to read source) and then give your argument another shot if you like.
I understood your "logic" the first time. That didn't mean I wanted a longer iteration of the same...
All it says is that apostles were sent after Christ. It doesn't say there was an end to Apostles. That would be where your fanciful interpretation comes in. :flirt:
"keep to what is written" means to trust the written scripture over the spoken word. AS I HAVE SAID A NUMBER OF TIMES ALREADY...
You will have to explain your nonsensical gibberish...
No, Paul said he *thought* they were sent to *them* last and no matter what way you would like to take that verse, it doesn't address my question so I am a little confused as to why you keep harping on it. All I can figure is that you...
um, which statement of Uchtawerwerdorf's?
The one about callings are to "always be accepted" (if my memory serves me). I think it is from the PH session.
Soy, you ought to know by now that I consider you a reasonable person. I don't think you hold any radical views and I don't usually have strong disagreements with you.
I don't think you are being unreasonable here either. I can see it as being possible too, I just have a hard time doing it. :D...
Okey dokey, I don't have time to ask this question in pictures so please try to read slowly.
Besides the fact that your color choice is obnoxious, you still have failed to address my point. I find it hilarious that people think they get to throw out random scripture and expect others to accept...
No. He was not visited by "pillars of light", two personages visited him IN a pillar of light... :cover:
No, it was not the followers of Joseph Smith who assigned identities to the personages:
Joseph Smith, Encyclopedia of Joseph Smith's Teachings, edited by Larry E. Dahl and Donald...
Your first argument must have been hard to make with a straight face. How about we finish that one?
You claimed Joseph Smith recieved no new revelation.
I have demonstrated your assertion to be false.
Would you like to concede that you are wrong or should I continue to list revelations...