Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
All of theism has the same amount of proof as woodland folk. Lets end the demonizing of our Christian members please.
Sure Christians are challenged much more often than other Theists, but that's the price one pays for being in the majority.
Who's demonizing?
Or better yet, we can all stop demonizing everyone. There's about as much proof that there isn't a god as there is proof that there is one.All of theism has the same amount of proof as Elves. Lets end the demonizing of our Christian members please.
Not quite, Danisty. IMO, science itself has "scientific" materialism against the ropes with things like Bell's theorem as well as the Aspect and double-slit experiments. Of course, the same experiments also pretty much destroy anthropomorphic concepts of God, too. The score is atheism 0, clasical theism 0, and the yet to be fully developed 1.Ðanisty;837227 said:Or better yet, we can all stop demonizing everyone. There's about as much proof that there isn't a god as there is proof that there is one.
I'm not sure what you're getting at. It seems you assume that atheism is always a belief in science. That really isn't necessary. It is simply a lack of belief. There is no proof that God or gods don't exist. You can only prove what does exist...you can't prove something doesn't exist.Not quite, Danisty. IMO, science itself has "scientific" materialism against the ropes with things like Bell's theorem as well as the Aspect and double-slit experiments. Of course, the same experiments also pretty much destroy anthropomorphic concepts of God, too. The score is atheism 0, clasical theism 0, and the yet to be fully developed 1.
I second that idea.Or better yet, we can all stop demonizing everyone.
Those who enthusiastically try to leech from Bell's Theorem the demise of naturalism demonstrate little beyond the distorting effects of wishful thinking.Not quite, Danisty. IMO, science itself has "scientific" materialism against the ropes with things like Bell's theorem as well as the Aspect and double-slit experiments.
I second that idea.
Those who enthusiastically try to leech from Bell's Theorem the demise of naturalism demonstrate little beyond the distorting effects of wishful thinking.
I love it when someone dismisses the interpretation of evidence without offering one of their own.Those who enthusiastically try to leech from Bell's Theorem the demise of naturalism demonstrate little beyond the distorting effects of wishful thinking.
I think he spelled it with an "i" --Elvis.All of theism has the same amount of proof as Elves.
I think he spelled it with an "i" --Elvis.
Mine is not the burden of proof. An assertion was made. Let's see if it can be substantiated.Ah, so this is where the "Theists rejoice!" thread is from. What is your argument against Bell's Theorem not demonstrating the demise of naturalism?