This is an interpretation of an iterpretation of the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle. It's interesting but not really verifiable proof of anything metaphysical. I say metaphysical because I notice in the video a computer generated poster of the "What The Bleep Do We Know" video which enters the realm borderlining pseudoscience.
It reminds of the whole nonsense about if a tree falls in the woods does it make a sound. Sound is not solely dependant upon a human observer being able to "hear" the sound waves vibrating the organs which we call sound. Sound is a physical principle which acts independant of humans being able to hear the phenomenon. The same is true with light.
Just because Heisenberg posited a principle that a particle cannot be both measured for position and velocity to come to such far reaching conclusions as Ramtha, or rather, J.Z. Knigh, Fred Alan Wolf and others state doesn't make it true.
It is interesting. But videos such as this seem to jump off the deep end and "woo-woo's", that's right, "woo-woo's" like to take experiments such as these and tell us that there is more than science can tell us. It took thousands of years before humans reached an understanding of physics that Newton, Kepler, Brache and others discovered. It was another few centuries before Bohm, Einstein, Maxwell and others showed us more.
Don't give up yet.
And besides, the big bang was not a bang and no cosmologist would tell you otherwise. It's a euphamism. Big Bang sounds better than inflationary universe.
And last, to conclude that human beings might lack the ability to understand all that we observe must require an initiator is nothing more than conjecture.