• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Proof of Creationism made by NASA

Sand Dancer

Crazy Cat Lady
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:


It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.

They are thinking the universe is far older than we had previously thought. So how did you come up with your conclusion?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
They are thinking the universe is far older than we had previously thought. So how did you come up with your conclusion?
And we may well be only part of a multiverse whereas who knows what existed prior to the BB.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
Instead of "fascinating", I prefer "nauseating", and that's because I painfully left the fundamentalist church I grew up in because of the rejection of this most basic scientific axiom, never to return.
I understand. For me, I find them fascinating in the sense that I truly cannot understand how they can engage in certain behaviors while being completely oblivious to what they're doing and how others perceive it.

I've kinda settled on one general explanation, but I'm not too happy about it. I wish I didn't have to go there, but after interacting with so many creationists for over 20 years and seeing the same things over and over, there really was no other conclusion to reach.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:


It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.
Good grief, not prison bird Kent Hovind again.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.
If that were true (which I doubt), why do think that is?
Maybe because religious people are slackers because they think their god is doing everything for them? Like the creationists "scientists" who rarely publish anything and don't do experiments?
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:


It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.
Aaaannnnndddd they're off! Again...sheesh.
 
Top