The Shout of an Archangel Before the Great Tribulation

[wizanda]

Ever since I was 4-5 years old I've known I'm sent from Heaven as an Avatar before the Great Tribulation; where my name (Zanda/Zan) is in many of the world's religious texts..

On studying these religious concepts, they've declared I'm head of the Divine Council in Heaven, and have the name of the Lord of Creation in many of the world's religions as one (Zechariah 14:9).

Biblically it is referenced that 'the Lord himself shall come with the Last Trumpet, like the Shout of an Archangel' (Psalms 47:5, Isaiah 58:1, Joel 2:1+15, Zechariah 9:14, 1 Thessalonians 4:16, 1 Corinthians 15:52) - Where I believe we can prove that is me.

At the age of 21 (1999), three years before reading the Bible, I fulfilled Revelation 10 & 5, which is the Last Trumpet (Revelation 10:7) - Where the Archangel who acts like a Pillar in the Temple of God is Sandalphon (Revelation 10:1, Revelation 3:12).

At 15 years old the Source of reality explained global eschatology to me, and asked me to read the world's religions, then to try to share this on the sky (internet) before Judgement Day.

As far as I can see from what has been prophesied, and what I've been told: Betelgeuse will be seen to have gone supernova (Amos 5:8, Isaiah 13:10, Zechariah 14:7), as the Zionist, & Rabbinic Rebels (Gog) funded by Christendom (Magog), kick off war with Iran (Armageddon).

Yeshua warned that when we see the Parable of the Fig (Matthew 24:29-35, Mark 13:24-31, Luke 21:25-33), then the sun & moon will be darkened (Yeshua was citing references to Orion), the stars (meteors) will fall from the sky, the sky and earth shall pass away, and then we will come to a new reality after.

When I was 21 at the fulfilment of Revelation 10, I was shown how Yeshua came to set a Snare by his testimony (Isaiah 8:11-22), and within studying these concepts, we can show how it interlinks with Isaiah 28:9-19 being the Bed of Adultery (Rumour to Rumour).

In me explaining the Bed of Adultery is the Parable of the 'Fig before Summer', where the Messiah returns in Isaiah 28:4, speaking a different language to the people (Isaiah 28:11-13); yet they won't listen to understand, whilst mocking the ideas (Isaiah 28:22).

Then after the coming Judgement Day Fire, God will resurrect the Enlightened Saints into a new world.

Just to be clear though I'm referencing the Bible statements, we could also do similar from the other religious concepts, referencing the same before Judgement Day:

Skanda before Mahāpralaya.
The Sayoshyant (Zand) before Frashokereti.
Wōdanaz before Ragnarök.
Sananda is the New Name of Messiah, before the Judgement Day Fire.
Sandalphon announces Judgement.
King David became Yeshua, and then becomes Zion.
Zeus is Zan.
(Last) Z and A (First).​

In my opinion.

 

[wizanda]

In the last 18 years of sharing this info before Judgement Day, I've mainly used ReligiousForums.com, and our own site...

I then appointed 'The Seventh Beggar' a professor of Kabbalah, who I've debated for 16 years on Paltalk, to inform the Rabbis that he had met an angel who'd fulfilled prophecy prior to Judgement Day.

I believe the username 7th Beggar is prophesied by Rabbi Nachman: Where it is to inspire the Young King who lost his kingdom to regain it; where instead 7th has chosen to reject my claims, and not inform anyone.

I've even stated, that Ezekiel 33:2-6, & Ezekiel 3:17-21 shows if he doesn't warn the people that the Last Trumpet is sounded, then their blood will be on his hands, and he has laughed.

Thus hopefully this post is slightly clearer, as I've not been going around telling everyone prophecy is being fulfilled before the Great Tribulation; as the world in my understanding is already following the Anti-Christ's doctrine, and trying to convince everyone they've already been lied to, isn't exactly safe.

In my opinion.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Dont really follow ya. I think there is just one man living today whos death/birth falls and rises with the end/beginninig of all existence. And on and on it goes forever. For me its simple. As far as all the other religious stuff, thats just fiction.

 

[wizanda]

Dont really follow ya. I think there is just one man living today whos death/birth falls and rises with the end/beginninig of all existence. And on and on it goes forever. For me its simple. As far as all the other religious stuff, thats just fiction.

Thank you for adding your belief to the thread, and I get you think that one man is the center of the universe; for me the Universal Central Processor (CPU/God) is the center of the reality, and we're just computer game characters, inside its imagination.

I believe we can show where some of the religious texts have been fulfilled to the letter, and thus they're not fiction, as we can show the realities happened historically.

What I understand to be prophesied in many religious ideologies, is that the whole reality will collapse to a singularity, and then be reformulated into a new reality in a single day...

Where I believe multiple religious texts prophesied me by name, as a final warning before Judgement Day to be ignored (Luke 17:20-37).

In my opinion.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Thank you for adding your belief to the thread, and I get you think that one man is the center of the universe; for me the Universal Central Processor (CPU/God) is the center of the reality, and we're just computer game characters, inside its imagination.

I believe we can show where some of the religious texts have been fulfilled to the letter, and thus they're not fiction, as we can show the realities happened historically.

What I understand to be prophesied in many religious ideologies, is that the whole reality will collapse to a singularity, and then be reformulated into a new reality in a single day...

Where I believe multiple religious texts prophesied me by name, as a final warning before Judgement Day to be ignored (Luke 17:20-37).

In my opinion.

Absolutely not the center of the universe. I'm just stating what is. For me God is above all and my God is infinite space.

 

[ppp]

New Ever since I was 4-5 years old I've known I'm sent from Heaven as an Avatar

I am unconvinced that you know or capable of knowing what you claim.

 

[King Phenomenon]

I am unconvinced that you know or capable of knowing what you claim.

no one needs to convince you

 

[wizanda]

I am unconvinced that you know or capable of knowing what you claim.

Fair enough, I can understand my own personal experience at 4-5, 15, 21 years old, would sound far fetched, if it wasn't for all the other religious textual validations...

Which to understand if it is prophetically accurate, would take unbiasedly analysing multiple religious ideas, and seeing if it is me making stuff up or if the data does correlate.

Interested in what it is you think I'm not 'capable of knowing' about my claim?

In my opinion.

 

[wizanda]

I'm just stating was is.

I think there is just one man living today whos death/birth falls and rises with the end/beginninig of all existence.

Like I don't mind questioning any belief, I've read many religious texts, and am always willing to study if I don't understand 'what is'...

So please show from other sources, how we can objectively prove what you're saying is accurate - Feel free to start another thread, proving your beliefs from religious texts.

In my opinion.

 

[King Phenomenon]

Like I don't mind questioning any belief, I've read many religious texts, and am always willing to study if I don't understand 'what is'...

So please show from other sources, how we can objectively prove what you're saying is accurate - Feel free to start another thread, proving your beliefs from religious texts.

In my opinion.

i dont have to prove anything from religious text. if you want more on what i believe read the link in my status.

 

[ppp]

Fair enough, I can understand my own personal experience at 4-5, 15, 21 years old, would sound far fetched, if it wasn't for all the other religious textual validations...

Which to understand if it is prophetically accurate, would take unbiasedly analysing multiple religious ideas, and seeing if it is me making stuff up or if the data does correlate.

Religious texts are not validation. Even if we ignore the fact that you are engaging in a biased interpretation of those texts, and assume that you are interpreting them absolutely correctly, all that can be said is that you understanding of your personal experience corresponds to those texts. That is a correlation between your personal experience and the text. At no point has there been a connection established between the religious texts and reality, nor between your understanding of your person experience and reality.

Interested in what it is you think I'm not 'capable of knowing' about my claim?

What I said was,
I am unconvinced that you know or capable of knowing what you claim. I don't have to be convinced of your inability in order not to be convinced of your ability.

 

[ppp]

no one needs to convince you

That is probably true.

 

[wizanda]

Even if we ignore the fact that you are engaging in a biased interpretation of those texts, and assume that you are interpreting them absolutely correctly, all that can be said is that you understanding of your personal experience corresponds to those texts.

We could remove my personal beliefs out of the equation, and analyse do the texts have certain warnings prior to the Great Tribulation; where they specify a certain character, with a specific name (Revelation 19:12)... Is it then possible to prove that name is accurate based on the religious texts (Revelation 3:12).

Personally I'd say the case is so solid, I'd be willing to stand in an international court of law to justify the case to religious experts.

Firstly though I'm proceeding to debate the case on here, and seeing if people can be logical with the evidence.

Dismissing all the evidence on here, before we go into detail, means the human race soon ends, and then God will just keep the Enlightened Saints as already planned.

At no point has there been a connection established between the religious texts and reality

This can only be done by other people establishing the religious name referencing is accurate, and this then aligns with religious prophecy globally; for it to then be objective, rather than only my subjective analysis.

In my opinion.

 

[ppp]

We could remove my personal beliefs out of the equation, and analyse do the texts have certain warnings prior to the Great Tribulation; where they specify a certain character, with a specific name (Revelation 19:12)... Is it then possible to prove that name is accurate based on the religious texts (Revelation 3:12).

All that does is establish that two names correspond. It does nothing to establish that a god exists in reality. That is a foundation that has to be established before either the text or you claims about yourself can be considered credible.

 

[wizanda]

It does nothing to establish that a god exists in reality. That is a foundation that has to be established before either the text or you claims about yourself can be considered credible.

So firstly lets remove the silly concept of calling the Source of reality 'God', as that is ambiguous, and people argue about identity, rather than what we're talking about.

Next when we've quantified that our reality is all mathematical, down to an atomic level; where the Periodic Table is made from matrices.

Our finger print, a snail shell, an ocean wave, and a galaxy spiral, shows there is a central Source to the mathematics - as they're all Fibonacci maths (Golden Spiral).

Now we've established that our reality is like being inside a universal computer, we can show that many top theoretical physicists/mathematicians have agreed.

“The mind of God we believe is cosmic music, the music of strings resonating through 11 dimensional hyperspace. That is the mind of God.” - Dr Michio Kaku

“I believe in Spinoza’s god, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a god who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.” - Dr Albert Einstein

"What one man calls God, another calls the laws of physics." - Nikola Tesla

“In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God's existence.” - Isaac Newton

Thus we can show from maths, that the Source of our reality is like a Universal Central Processor (CPU) - manifesting reality as an advanced symphony (Logic).

All that does is establish that two names correspond.

There aren't just two names in the list; there are references across many of the world's religious texts as one.

In my opinion.

 

[ppp]

So firstly lets remove the silly concept of calling the Source of reality 'God', as that is ambiguous, and people argue about identity, rather than what we're talking about.

I have never used nor alluded to the concept of any god being a source of reality. So, unless it was you who introduced that silly concept, I have to wonder if your reply has anything to do with anything that I said.

Next when we've quantified that our reality is all mathematical, down to an atomic level; where the Periodic Table is made from matrices.

That sentence is grammatically incomprehensible.

Our finger print, a snail shell, an ocean wave, and a galaxy spiral, shows there is a central Source to the mathematics - as they're all Fibonacci maths (Golden Spiral).

So is that one.

Now we've established that our reality is like being inside a universal computer, we can show that many top theoretical physicists/mathematicians have agreed.

Reality is nothing like being inside a computer.

There aren't just two names in the list; there are references across many of the world's religious texts as one.

Don't care. None of those religious text have any relevant connection to reality. You may as well be referencing comic books.

Like I said. You are unable to demonstrate a significant connection between your claims and reality. Connecting your claims to religious texts that also lack that connection does not make you credible.

 

[wizanda]

I have never used nor alluded to the concept of any god being a source of reality.

I said that, and I specified why we need to do that to approach the conversation logically to begin with.

That sentence is grammatically incomprehensible.

Now you're just being strange, and then pointing fingers, whilst three point back...

The sentence has been stated to many people prior; where I know I've had educated people thank me for it.

Reality is nothing like being inside a computer.

None of those religious text have any relevant connection to reality.

Unfortunately billions of people say otherwise.

You may as well be referencing comic books.

Many of these comic books are written in clever ways to discuss psychology, sociology, life, metaphysics, etc.

You are unable to demonstrate a significant connection between your claims and reality.

Thank you for the opertunity to answer; yet sorry we won't get anywhere in dialogue, as you're not getting the basics already discussed.

In my opinion.

 

[ppp]

Now you're just being strange, and then pointing fingers, whilst three point back...

The sentence has been stated to many people prior; where I know I've had educated people thank me for it.

No. I am saying that sentence is grammatically incomprehensible. There is no subtext there. I dare you to try to diagram it.

@wizanda cites, 2016 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate: Is the Universe a Simulation?

I was in the audience. Could you hear me clapping?

Reality is nothing like being inside a computer.

Unfortunately billions of people say otherwise.

Billions of people have been wrong about a lot of things.

Many of these comic books are written in clever ways to discuss psychology, sociology, life, metaphysics, etc.

I agree, they do. Never the less, there is no Wolverine. There is no Galactus. There is no Speed Force.

Thank you for the opertunity to answer; yet sorry we won't get anywhere in dialogue, as you're not getting the basics already discussed.

I get your basics. Like kryptonite, they are not difficult concepts. There is simply no evidence that your existential claims connect to actual existence. Until you are able to establish that foundation, your basics are just fluff in the wind.

I wish you the best luck in all your future endeavors.

 

[wizanda]

I dare you to try to diagram it.

In my opinion.

 

[ppp]

In my opinion.

That is not a diagrammed sentence. That is the Periodic Table of the Elements. You can tell that be looking at the title reading, Periodic Table of the Elements. Elements are physical objects that comprise molecules. Sentences are conceptual objects composed of words that represent parts of speech.

Good try though.