Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Have you ever bought lumber?All the time and energy that went into designing and building all that technical machinery, and all the money that went into automating all those tasks that had once been done by humans, and at no time along that way did anyone even bother to ask if it was a good thing for our society to do this. Is it good for our society of human beings, and for the Earth that sustains us, for us to have created this giant tree processing plant? Is the community it sits in better off, now, than they were before it was built? Are the surrounding forests better off for this new ability to process a tree that took 30 years to grow into a pile of lumber in just a few minutes?
I'm only asking because no one else involved in this 'miracle of automation' did. Because they are all capitalists. The only question they asked themselves was will we gain a handsome return on the capital we invest in this processing plant? That's it. That's the only question the answer of which mattered to them. Nothing else was even considered beyond how it might effect that profitability. And that's sad.
Sad that we routinely expend so much time and energy and resources on projects like this without ever even once having considered the impact of it on overall human well-being, or on the environment that sustains us. It's all and only ever about the money. The profit to the investors. Nothing else.
It's certainly going, with the passage of time, to create a class division of haves and have not people.All the time and energy that went into designing and building all that technical machinery, and all the money that went into automating all those tasks that had once been done by humans, and at no time along that way did anyone even bother to ask if it was a good thing for our society to do this. Is it good for our society of human beings, and for the Earth that sustains us, for us to have created this giant tree processing plant? Is the community it sits in better off, now, than they were before it was built? Are the surrounding forests better off for this new ability to process a tree that took 30 years to grow into a pile of lumber in just a few minutes?
I'm only asking because no one else involved in this 'miracle of automation' did. Because they are all capitalists. The only question they asked themselves was will we gain a handsome return on the capital we invest in this processing plant? That's it. That's the only question the answer of which mattered to them. Nothing else was even considered beyond how it might effect that profitability. And that's sad.
Sad that we routinely expend so much time and energy and resources on projects like this without ever even once having considered the impact of it on overall human well-being, or on the environment that sustains us. It's all and only ever about the money. The profit to the investors. Nothing else.
Making lumber without automation would mean thatIt's certainly going, with the passage of time, to create a class division of haves and have not people.
Putting people out of work is never good policy unless there are provisions to insure an income still exists.
Again, it's ALL about the money.Have you ever bought lumber?
Have you ever considered that housing
prices would be far far higher if it were
made by hand?
Automation such as this is greener than
hiring & supporting a vast army of workers
to accomplish the same product.
You must be a lot of fun at engine shows.Again, it's ALL about the money.
Perhaps if lumber were more expensive, (and the costs were going to labor instead of profits to the capitalists) we'd all be happier in the long run, or we'd have long ago devised better and cheaper material solutions. Something we can grow in large quantities and then use as fertilizer for the next crop when we're done with it. Some sort of plant based building blocks. If we're clever enough to create that giant high speed lumber mill, we're clever enough to create better alternatives. But we don't even consider them unless there's a big profit margin involved for the investors, because the profit margins are ALL that the investors ever consider. And they make all our production decisions.
I have nothing against automation and high efficiency. The problem is that we NEVER consider the well-being of humanity. We ONLY consider the profit margins to the capital investors. And as a result, we make a lot of really stupid and culturally debilitating decisions. And things just keep getting worse for more and more people instead of getting better.
All the time and energy that went into designing and building all that technical machinery, and all the money that went into automating all those tasks that had once been done by humans, and at no time along that way did anyone even bother to ask if it was a good thing for our society to do this. Is it good for our society of human beings, and for the Earth that sustains us, for us to have created this giant tree processing plant? Is the community it sits in better off, now, than they were before it was built? Are the surrounding forests better off for this new ability to process a tree that took 30 years to grow into a pile of lumber in just a few minutes?
I'm only asking because no one else involved in this 'miracle of automation' did. Because they are all capitalists. The only question they asked themselves was will we gain a handsome return on the capital we invest in this processing plant? That's it. That's the only question the answer of which mattered to them. Nothing else was even considered beyond how it might effect that profitability. And that's sad.
Sad that we routinely expend so much time and energy and resources on projects like this without ever even once having considered the impact of it on overall human well-being, or on the environment that sustains us. It's all and only ever about the money. The profit to the investors. Nothing else.
I worked in one of those places as a young man. In the melt shop of a giant steel mill, on the floor around three gigantic electrode ovens. It took about three or four days to "cook" a batch of steel, and we'd all stop work and watch them tip the oven and poor the molten steel into giant buckets, and then over into the molds. They evacuated the air out of the molds before filling them, so the molten steel would get sucked into it like rain. And the molds had windows in them so you could see it happening inside them. The place closed down soon after, as all of them did. But I was happy to have gotten to see one in action.Fun with forging!
Wood is a great material to make things out of. But we don't need to make houses out of it.There's high demand for wood--for furniture, houses, and various other products--so this process of automation tries to satisfy that demand. You and I use wood and many other things that were directly or indirectly produced by similar industrial processes.
The engineers are hired by the capitalists. Always to make the capitalists more money. Never to improve the lot of humanity or the planet. This is my point. We aren't even considering the well-being of humanity or the planet when we decide what we build next. We ONLY consider the profits to the capital investors. I'm not against engineers, or even the capitalists. I'm against our never considering the well-being of humanity or the planet when we set about re-arranging the world.The question about the environment seems to me one that would be better framed in terms of population numbers, the ecological sustainability of comfortable living past a certain population threshold, and humans' natural desire for comfort even if that has a detrimental effect on the environment. I think these are the more overarching questions, not whether the engineers who simply tried to solve a problem of insufficient supply were being uber-capitalists in doing so.
We can make decent homes out of all kinds of materials.Making lumber without automation would mean that
only the wealthy would be able to afford decent homes.
What do you propose instead....concrete, sod, straw, bacon?We can make decent homes out of all kinds of materials.
Bricks or stones, like people use who value a solid home.What do you propose instead....concrete, sod, straw, bacon?
Solid brick or stone is very spendy & poorly insulated.Bricks or stones, like people use who value a solid home.
150 years. Pfft. Find a wood building this old:Solid brick or stone is very spendy & poorly insulated.
My wooden house was built in 1875, & has no signs
of decaying.
Yet my house is in better shape than when it was built.150 years. Pfft. Find a wood building this old: