• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Revived pig organs after death

paradox

(㇏(•̀ᵥᵥ•́)ノ)
I already heard about this news, what terrifies me the most is the biotechnology itself.

Just like AI research can lead to abuse and loss of control so can biotech lead to invention of all sorts of horrible viruses or loss of control over human existence.
in regards to AI taking over the world which sounds like sci-fi, bio-tech is far more potent to destroy us.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I already heard about this news, what terrifies me the most is the biotechnology itself.

Just like AI research can lead to abuse and loss of control so can biotech lead to invention of all sorts of horrible viruses or loss of control over human existence.
in regards to AI taking over the world which sounds like sci-fi, bio-tech is far more potent to destroy us.
Like your moniker, it's a paradox that in efforts for immortality, we will eventually destroy ourselves in the process.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Revived pig organs after death

If pigs are so useful for medical experiments to save human life, why kill them to eat their meat, please?
And why it is termed unpleasant if we call somebody a pig or swine, please?

Regards
 

VoidCat

Pronouns: he/him/they/them
Revived pig organs after death

If pigs are so useful for medical experiments to save human life, why kill them to eat their meat, please?
And why it is termed unpleasant if we call somebody a pig or swine, please?

Regards
Well the pigs were killed anyway in this experiment.

And as for your second question i don't know the history or why it is an insult.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I suspect the real reason Christians are opposed to scientific attempts at resurrection of the dead are because it would make their Jesus redundant.

In my opinion.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Revived pig organs after death

If pigs are so useful for medical experiments to save human life, why kill them to eat their meat, please?

Because they taste delicious, and there are enough pigs to do both, so it is an "and" question, not an "or" question.

And why it is termed unpleasant if we call somebody a pig or swine, please?

Regards
Because many people consider themselves higher in rank than animals.

It is Western culture to love dogs, but you can still insult someone by calling them a dog.

In my opinion.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Well the pigs were killed anyway in this experiment.

And as for your second question i don't know the history or why it is an insult.
They say Buddha died because he ate meat of a swine accidentally, please. Right?

Regards
_____________
"Buddha Shakyamuni himself died of eating tainted pork that was offered to him in alms"
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
They say Buddha died because he ate meat of a swine accidentally, please. Right?

Regards
_____________
"Buddha Shakyamuni himself died of eating tainted pork that was offered to him in alms"
Wrong, he is alleged to have died from food poisoning from "tainted" pork meaning pork that was polluted or infected.

Ordinary pork won't kill one any more than ordinary chicken will.

Millions of people eat pork without dying.

And people get food poisoning from other types of tainted meat such as tainted chicken or tainted beef or tainted fish.

In my opinion.
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
It's My Birthday!
Wrong, he is alleged to have died from food poisoning from "tainted" pork meaning pork that was polluted or infected.

Ordinary pork won't kill one any more than ordinary chicken will.

Millions of people eat pork without dying.

And people get food poisoning from other types of tainted meat such as tainted chicken or tainted beef or tainted fish.

In my opinion.
The quote mentioned that the pork was tainted. Give him a break.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The quote mentioned that the pork was tainted. Give him a break.
The quote mentioned that the pork was tainted, but there was no indication from his words that he understood the quote as he dropped the word tainted and claimed Buddha died when by accident "he ate meat of a swine".

In my opinion.
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
It's My Birthday!
The quote mentioned that the pork was tainted, but there was no indication from his words that he understood the quote as he dropped the word tainted and claimed Buddha died when by accident "he ate meat of a swine".

In my opinion.
Getting hard on him for not using a word you consider necessary. In my opinion, we should give people the benefit of the doubt, not the other way around. No matter. He will answer your complaint himself, and we will see if you are right about him or not. Perhaps I'm jumping into a discussion where it's not necessary for me to jump in. My apologies.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Back in the past old fallout caused skin blood bone changes to everything. Like cancers and every change you could list.

Our brother evil personified in artificial thoughts only that he contrived as he can then acts accordingly falsely taught.....pigs had worms. Caused by bio changes.

In the olden days meat was spit cooked or tossed on coals and eaten rare.

Worms invaded the brain. Killed humans.

No human which is actual theisms. No changes to anything by scientists either is pretty basic humans intelligence.

Who knows what artificial thinking scientists are using as new artificial Theism...I will...I want....I will terms.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Getting hard on him for not using a word you consider necessary. In my opinion, we should give people the benefit of the doubt, not the other way around. No matter. He will answer your complaint himself, and we will see if you are right about him or not. Perhaps I'm jumping into a discussion where it's not necessary for me to jump in. My apologies.
I'm not sure why you saw me as "getting hard on him".

He asked was his statement right and the correct answer to that is no. Nothing "hard" about it, unless you consider honesty as hardship perhaps? I don't know.
 
Top