Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Noshould the OT and/or NT be changed to reflect the rights of the unborn? Spirits?
If the anti-choicers want a Bible that actually condemns abortion, then sure: they ought to revise the Bible so that it actually condemns abortion.should the OT and/or NT be changed to reflect the rights of the unborn? Spirits?
It already does.should the OT and/or NT be changed to reflect the rights of the unborn? Spirits?
no it doesn't.It already does.
No need for any changes.
God was appalled when his people sacrificed thier children to moloch.no it doesn't.
jesus doesn't even speak on it and we know from historical writings that abortions were being carried out
how do you know your god? have you ever met it? talked to it face to face like jacob? is it something you can take a picture of? is it something you can introduce to another person and they see it, hear it, respond to it?God was appalled when his people sacrificed thier children to moloch.
God said when he formed us in the womb he already knew us.
Jesus said if you hurt a child you should be drowned.
You are just flat wrong.
these were human children that had been born. otherwise the israelites would have been offering aborted sheep, cattle, goat fetuses.God was appalled when his people sacrificed thier children to moloch.
God said when he formed us in the womb he already knew us.
Jesus said if you hurt a child you should be drowned.
You are just flat wrong.
If the anti-choicers want a Bible that actually condemns abortion, then sure: they ought to revise the Bible so that it actually condemns abortion.
It doesnt need to be changed as it already upholds the rights of the unborn.should the OT and/or NT be changed to reflect the rights of the unborn? Spirits?
Where? You are probably misinterpreting it again.It already does.
No need for any changes.
They already did that. Get a Bible from before Roe v Wade. Exodus 21 22-23 used to use the word "miscarriage". After Roe v Wade it was rewritten to imply that the woman gave birth early.If the anti-choicers want a Bible that actually condemns abortion, then sure: they ought to revise the Bible so that it actually condemns abortion.
should the OT and/or NT be changed to reflect the rights of the unborn? Spirits?
Besides the verses I mentioned? Well, there is the Test of an Unfaithful Wife.Why do you think it is not yet so?
Wait, you seem to have contradicted yourself.Changing a spiritual scripture is wrong. They are written so humans change according to the scriptures and the other way around.
Changing a scripture to fit the people would mean the scriptures are no longer from God.
No I have always said its wrong to take a scripture and let normal people change it so it fit them.Wait, you seem to have contradicted yourself.
Scriptures appear to always be from man.No I have always said its wrong to take a scripture and let normal people change it so it fit them.
The only people capable of doing those things are prophets and enlighten beings.
If you or I tried to change a religious scripture we would damage it and destroy it just by changing one word.
I believe they are from God through a prophet or messengerScriptures appear to always be from man.