• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Di dirty-hot animal or respectful human?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
We share a common ancestor with macaques, - says Mr. satan. So, there were no macaques and orangutans in Princess Diana's family and ancestry?
But only highly educated and cultural people gave birth to Princess Diana.
Why am I sure? A common ancestor with monkeys is not a monkey at all! If he were a macaque, he would have been called a macaque!

No, Di is not animal. She is being. But not animal being. She is human being. Google term "human being". Don't follow modern stupidity.

Beings are:
1. God.
2. Angel.
3. Human.
4. Animal, bird.
5. Insects.
5. Plant, tree.

"your lack of understanding of biology is astounding."
Lack of nonsense is sense. I am not Darwinist, and I advise nobody to be one.
 
Last edited:

Altfish

Veteran Member
We share a common ancestor with macaques, - says Mr. satan. So, there were no macaques and orangutans in Princess Diana's family and ancestry?
But only highly educated and cultural people gave birth to Princess Diana.
Why am I sure? A common ancestor with monkeys is not a monkey at all! If he were a macaque, he would have been called a macaque!
Good grief, your lack of understanding of biology is astounding.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
We share a common ancestor with macaques, - says Mr. satan. So, there were no macaques and orangutans in Princess Diana's family and ancestry?
But only highly educated and cultural people gave birth to Princess Diana.
Why am I sure? A common ancestor with monkeys is not a monkey at all! If he were a macaque, he would have been called a macaque!

Di was a human animal and rather a ranchy one it seems.

Just a few weeks before her death i spotted her on the deck of Dodi's yatch moored off Sorrento small harbor having what seemed to be great animalistic fun with her boyfriend.

Though of course, it qll could have been royally innocent
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Princess Diana was human, therefore, an animal. I am an animal. Unless you're AI, you are an animal.

Nothing wrong with that!

No, Di is not animal. She is being. But not animal being.

Beings are:
1. God.
2. Angel.
3. Human.
4. Animal, bird.
5. Insects.
5. Plant, tree.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Di was a human animal
No, Di is not animal. She is being. But not animal being. She is human being. Google term "human being". Don't follow modern stupidity.

Beings are:
1. God.
2. Angel.
3. Human.
4. Animal, bird.
5. Insects.
5. Plant, tree.

"your lack of understanding of biology is astounding."
Lack of nonsense is sense.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No, Di is not animal. She is being. But not animal being. She is human being. Google term "human being". Don't follow modern stupidity.

Beings are:
1. God.
2. Angel.
3. Human.
4. Animal, bird.
5. Insects.
5. Plant, tree.

"your lack of understanding of biology is astounding."
Lack of nonsense is sense.
Like I said, you are claiming that Princess Di was a tree:rolleyes:

Was she a pine or an oak?
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
Lack of nonsense is sense.
Oh dear, knowledge is a great thing. Avoidance of knowledge is dogma.
Biology has given us medicine, drugs, life saving operations and much more; just because your Holy Book doesn't assimilate with it doesn't make it nonsense.
Perhaps there is another explanation?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
No, Di is not animal. She is being. But not animal being. She is human being. Google term "human being". Don't follow modern stupidity.

Beings are:
1. God.
2. Angel.
3. Human.
4. Animal, bird.
5. Insects.
5. Plant, tree.

"your lack of understanding of biology is astounding."
Lack of nonsense is sense.


My only possible reaction to that is...
c0c7e14cc65c6060812e20e8dab95562.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top