• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why are we alone in Universe?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member

Consider the Fermi paradox, i.e., the "absence of recordable life in cosmos,
while the abiogenesis has to happen.'' The official point of view is that the
Fermi paradox not only exists but is unsolved yet. Romantic people look at
night at star systems and think that the sky is full of life because the
chance for Earth to get alive was the same as the chance for any suitable
planet to bloom with living organisms. It is a romantic delusion. The Earth is
alive, and Mars is dead only because the people are born on Earth. Consider
ten planets suitable for life. The Earth and Mars are among them. The current
time is 4 000 000 000 BC. If it is given that there will be one single living
planet in this group of worlds with a probability of 30 %, then the
likelihood that the Earth gets alive is exactly this 30 %, as the humans must
be exactly there, where the life has begun. But Mars has not this advantage;
hence, the probability of Mars getting life is (1/10)*30 %=3 %. The
difference between 3 % and 30 % is explained by Luck. I have written a
solution to the Fermi Paradox because the famous Drake equation uses the wrong
value for a planet's probability to get a life. The latter was equated to 100 \%.
But I tell you that the actual figure is noticeably less; in the above
argument, it is less than 3 % even for a planet perfectly suitable to start
life. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923

We can discuss the new whereabouts about aliens, but please give me credit and honor for solution of the specific problem: Fermi Paradox. Let me feel good, at least one sec.
 
Last edited:

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want

Consider the Fermi paradox, i.e., the "absence of recordable life in cosmos,
while the abiogenesis has to happen.'' Romantic people look at night at star
systems and think that the sky is full of life because the chance for Earth to
get alive was the same as the chance for any suitable planet to bloom with
living organisms. It is a romantic delusion. The Earth is alive, and Mars is
dead only because the people are born on Earth. Consider ten planets suitable
for life. The Earth and Mars are among them. The current time is 4 000 000 000
BC. If it is given that there will be one single living planet in this group
of worlds with a probability of 30 %, then the likelihood that the Earth gets
alive is exactly this 30 %, as the humans must be exactly there, where the life has begun.
But Mars has not this advantage; hence, the probability of Mars getting
life is (1/10)*30 %=3 %. The difference between 3 % and 30 % is explained
by Luck. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923
I disagree with you, i believe there are inteligent life in a lot of places in this universe, and they may have visited us already.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Does the Fermi Paradox take in to consideration that they can already have visited us, but governments here on earth hiding the truth from us citizens?
We can discuss the new whereabouts about aliens, but please give me credit and honor for solution of the specific problem: Fermi Paradox. Let me feel good, at least one sec.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
We can discuss the new whereabouts about aliens, but please give me credit and honor for solution of the specific problem: Fermi Paradox. Let me feel good, at least one sec.
Should I honor you for creating a theory that i disagree with you on?

Do you write your papers for fame and honor to you as a person, or to give people a chance to read it, and discuss it?
 

syo

Well-Known Member
We are not alone. Aliens deliberately avoid us, because humans are awful.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
God: Humans, so good I only made one example of such and all the rest of existence means nothing to me. :oops:

Or

God: I made all of life and then humans came along to spoil all my good work. :oops:

(Because I'm not that good) :D
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Why would there only be life on one planet out of trillions of planet in the universe?
I am not saying that. I am saying that I have made an unpublished solution to Fermi Paradox. The famous Drake equation uses the wrong value for the probability of a perfectly suitable for living planet getting alive. This probability was equated to 100 % in the Drake equation. But I tell you that the actual figure is noticeably less.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee

Consider the Fermi paradox, i.e., the "absence of recordable life in cosmos,
while the abiogenesis has to happen.'' Romantic people look at night at star
systems and think that the sky is full of life because the chance for Earth to
get alive was the same as the chance for any suitable planet to bloom with
living organisms. It is a romantic delusion. The Earth is alive, and Mars is
dead only because the people are born on Earth. Consider ten planets suitable
for life. The Earth and Mars are among them. The current time is 4 000 000 000
BC. If it is given that there will be one single living planet in this group
of worlds with a probability of 30 %, then the likelihood that the Earth gets
alive is exactly this 30 %, as the humans must be exactly there, where the life has begun.
But Mars has not this advantage; hence, the probability of Mars getting
life is (1/10)*30 %=3 %. The difference between 3 % and 30 % is explained
by Luck. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.73923

We can discuss the new whereabouts about aliens, but please give me credit and honor for solution of the specific problem: Fermi Paradox. Let me feel good, at least one sec.
The "Fermi paradox" isn't an actual problem because we aren't able to even observe every planet in our galaxy, let alone the entire universe, so the lack of hard evidence for ET life is a red herring. It's like claiming that driving on an empty stretch road means that there are no other cars anywhere on that road.
We may be alone, but it is entirely possible that we are not. At present, it is impossible for science to say, one way or the other, so any claim to do so is mere eyewash.
 
Last edited:

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
I am not saying that. I am saying that I have made an unpublished solution to Fermi Paradox. The famous Drake equation uses the wrong value for the probability of a perfectly suitable for living planet getting alive. This probability was equated to 100 % in the Drake equation. But I tell you that the actual figure is noticeably less.
I know i am no scientist, but i read your paper....and could not find any proof
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
but i read your paper....and could not find any proof
But you read the paper and could not find any proof?
It is ignorance and nihilism. The nihilism is defined by F. Nietzsche as
"rejection of an obvious truth". Example of Nihilism is saying $2+2+4=34$.
My paper has proofs, even if they are only wrong proofs.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Thats nice of you to say......
But you read the paper and could not find any proof?
It is ignorance and nihilism. The nihilism is defined by F. Nietzsche as
"rejection of an obvious truth". Example of Nihilism is saying 2+2+4=34.
My paper has proofs (not cars and not birds), even if they are only wrong proofs.
 
Last edited:
Top