• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scientific Hypothesis of God was banned

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
The Intelligent Design, look the video in Scientific Christianity strikes again
was aimed not to prove God, but to introduce Hypothesis of God's existence into Scientific Community.

Why? Before the developing scientific proof of God, one must ask the question: "Is there God?"
And this question must sound in a peer-review scientific journal.

But, sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized. Unlike bisexual activity.
 
Last edited:

Nimos

Well-Known Member
Why? Before the developing scientific proof of God, one must ask the question: "Is there God?"
Shouldn't one start by even defining what a God is? As far as I know there is not clear definition of this.

Secondly, how should we test for God? ID trying to cast doubt on evolution doesn't do anything in regards to demonstrating God. Even if they somehow managed to prove evolution wrong, they still have to demonstrate that one exist, that is completely independent of whether or not evolution is true or false.

Until these things are done, there is simply no scientific foundation for "studying" the idea of a God.

But, sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized. Unlike bisexual activity.
What on Earth do you mean by that? Christianity is the most dominating religion in the world, but yet it is not accepted as a mean of doing science, if that is what you mean? And have no clue what that has to do with bisexual activities?
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
What on Earth do you mean by that? Christianity is the most dominating religion in the world, but yet it is not accepted as a mean of doing science, if that is what you mean?
Yes, the Christianity is the main religion, but due to separation of Church and state, the believers are outlaws. Sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized.
 
Last edited:

Nimos

Well-Known Member
Yes, the Christianity is the main religion, but due to separation of Church and state, the believers are outlaws.
Sure about that? Atheists doesn't seem to do very well when it comes to trust, at least not in the US. Also looking at how some religious minorities are treated around the world (including atheists), it seems to be a good idea to keep it separated.

5-16-2014-12-22-25-PM.png
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
The Intelligent Design, look the video in Scientific Christianity strikes again
was aimed not to prove God, but to introduce Hypothesis of God's existence into Scientific Community.
Actually ID was a retooling of Creationism. Look at the Wedge Document as evidence of this conspiracy against knowledge:

Wedge Strategy - RationalWiki

Why? Before the developing scientific proof of God, one must ask the question: "Is there God?"
Let religions fight over which of their many gods is the real god. Then the winner can come forth and present their results.

And this question must sound in a peer-review scientific journal.
Study of religious belief does appear in scientific journals.

But, sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized. Unlike bisexual activity.
What is this supposed to mean?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Yes, the Christianity is the main religion, but due to separation of Church and state, the believers are outlaws. Sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized.
You aren't explaining anything. Do you mean you want secular nations to be theocracies?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
All theistic religions have one common truth: God is name, God exists.
But it's not a fact, so we have to question why religious people think it's true.



Blasphemic, heretic study.
So you are sinking deeper into being anti-science, and more theocratic. Have you asked yourself why?

I'm curious why you are reacting this way.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
But, sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized. Unlike bisexual activity.
For an illegal religion, there sure a lot of Christians
& their churches around. And they comprise nearly
all Presidents & Congressmen.
Could it be that your sense of oppression is imagined?

If there's an atheist plot against Christians, I was never
included. Was it something I said? Or wore?
 

Orbit

I'm a planet
For an illegal religion, there sure a lot of Christians
& their churches around. And they comprise nearly
all Presidents & Congressmen.
Could it be that your sense of oppression is imagined?

If there's an atheist plot against Christians, I was never
included. Was it something I said? Or wore?

You didn't have the secret handshake.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
The Intelligent Design, look the video in Scientific Christianity strikes again
was aimed not to prove God, but to introduce Hypothesis of God's existence into Scientific Community.

Why? Before the developing scientific proof of God, one must ask the question: "Is there God?"
And this question must sound in a peer-review scientific journal.

But, sadly, the Christianity is not yet legalized. Unlike bisexual activity.
Scientific theory is a body of facts, God is rejected because there are no facts concerning God.
 

AdamjEdgar

Active Member
I think the real issue is not whether science can prove God but rather it cannot explain the reason for our existence.
I always ask
What started the big bang and why...where did the energy and matter come from?
The explanation I'm hearing these days is that nothing, became something for such a tiny amount of time, it basically remained nothing and that doesn't breach the law that energy and matter cannot be created!
I have to ask, why do people who believe such a statement think Christians are naive and stupid?

The truth I think is that most people never even bother to question that fundamental issue about the big bang...it does not even enter their heads!
Even Stephen Hawkings answer to that question is surprising.the real answer from science is "we don't know yet"!
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
What started the big bang and why...where did the energy and matter come from?
With my very limited understanding, the only position that makes sense to me is "infinity". IOW, something(s) always had to exist but likely to be everchanging. Can I prove this? No.
 
Top