So how do you apply this to your belief?Yes, of course I could be wrong.
The advantage non-believers have is that the logical default in logic and debate is that the affirmative has the burden of proof. All claims are considered untrue until they can be demonstrated true. Atheist means non-theist, non-belief. Even theists don't believe in the religions of others, so there is a consistency in non-belief. Its just that atheists don't believe any of the many, many religions.The refusal to countenance the possibility of being wrong, the inability to give ground in an argument; these are among the hallmarks of the fundamentalist (and the narcissist). Are you really going to tell me you don’t see these traits exhibited by some of the atheist contributors to this forum? Of course, it’s possible that you just don’t read their posts,
Anyone that makes a true claim in a debate opens the door to criticism, and also a burden of proof to demonstrate the claim is true. Or at least plausible and likely true. Religion as a class of claims has a serious liability in that it includes supernatural elements, and that is a phenomenon not known to exist.