• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God is the one who's creating all the things that you see all around you.

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
You are being inconsistent once again.
Maybe, but maybe you are dogmatically assuming a consistency to the world that is not in the world as such, but only a belief in you.

So here is the test. We are both in the world, different parts of the world and neither of us are all of the world.

You are consistent and I am not. So the question is, is all of the world constient, if a part is not? Answer that please.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Maybe, but maybe you are dogmatically assuming a consistency to the world that is not in the world as such, but only a belief in you.

So here is the test. We are both in the world, different parts of the world and neither of us are all of the world.

You are consistent and I am not. So the question is, is all of the world constient, if a part is not? Answer that please.
Nope. One does not need to be dogmatic to test reality.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yes, I know. I am not in the world nor reality and you are. And somehow you know as in the world and in reality, that I am not in them. So how do you know this?
You are in reality. You just seem to deny it quite often.

By the way, do you realize that you have ceded the right to demand answers to questions?
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
You are in reality. You just seem to deny it quite often.

By the way, do you realize that you have ceded the right to demand answers to questions?

So that is a part of reality and how it works. Good, we agree.

For the non-bold. I don't care, because you have no Objective Authority over the world or reality.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
One meant mass meant everything is only owned once and not by humans.

The human teaching you are a self who dies. God everything continues without you. We live supported by earth the mass and heavens a mass.

Pretty basic human advice.

Human science argued about ownership. A natural human knew we were not any God.

If we said we were sons and daughters of God as humans it said we were only humans.

Genesis was a human medical advice was not gods advice. The information theists lied about.

You only own human genesis as a human in self human presence.

If you asked what mass of spirit do we own as human the percentage was water oxygen.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So that is a part of reality and how it works. Good, we agree.

For the non-bold. I don't care, because you have no Objective Authority over the world or reality.
At least I appear to understand it far better than you do. Solipsism is not a working philosophy. It is fine for hiding in the closet and masturbating, but there is much more to life than that.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
At least I appear to understand it far better than you do. Solipsism is not a working philosophy. It is fine for hiding in the closet and masturbating, but there is much more to life than that.

Okay, I will nice. But you get about 1 hour and then I will report your post and give context to how you might have broken the rules.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Okay, I will nice. But you get about 1 hour and then I will report your post and give context to how you might have broken the rules.
I went back to sleep. So the hour was up. But what was wrong with my statement? I have only seen solipsism used to defend selfish behavior. My example may have been a bit extreme, but it was correct.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
I went back to sleep. So the hour was up. But what was wrong with my statement? I have only seen solipsism used to defend selfish behavior. My example may have been a bit extreme, but it was correct.

Only using evidence show that selfish behavior is bad. That is your belief, I know. But I want evidence. Or you are an irrational believer like that rest of us and you are in for a Nobel prize. It is that simple.
Solve ethics with science or shut up, because you are now different than the rest of us and not special.

And since you know what solipsism is, how many versions are there?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Only using evidence show that selfish behavior is bad. That is your belief, I know. But I want evidence. Or you are an irrational believer like that rest of us and you are in for a Nobel prize. It is that simple.
Solve ethics with science or shut up, because you are now different than the rest of us and not special.

And since you know what solipsism is, how many versions are there?
Do you want evidence? Okay, a prime example of selfish behavior is vaccine denialism. We see that far more in red counties than in blue counties in the US. Guess which ones have a far higher death rate due to Covid19? I can provide the statistics for you.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Do you want evidence? Okay, a prime example of selfish behavior is vaccine denialism. We see that far more in red counties than in blue counties in the US. Guess which ones have a far higher death rate due to Covid19? I can provide the statistics for you.

Yeah, it is subjectively bad. But I want evidence as per science and not your feelings. I can base everything on feeling. I mean I don't like you, so you are not really a human and not relevant. But you don't want that, right? You want evidence and so do I.
 
Top