• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
The Jesus Christ in view of Darwin:
  1. He used Death (one of the names of satan) to create the World and Nature.
  2. Is not able to create humans, and by far - angels, but only animals.
  3. He is not God, but a mammal (animal) only.
Hence, Darwinism is not true (it means "not faithful") to God. Shortly: Darwinism is not true.


No, I can not. Nobody can because it can not be explained in simpler terms. It has irreducible simplicity.



In my opinion, this is unexpected and highly dislikable.


How many theorems in Modern Darwinism? It is the most prominent theory of all science, most well-"proven" theory, but without any theorems with their proofs.


If there is 0.0000001 % poison in good food, all food is one big poison.


Sheesh

SingleShamelessAbyssiniangroundhornbill-small.gif
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Of course. The spirit of God is trans-universal and cannot be equated to false Death. Darwin claimed to be the Lord and Coming Angel of atheism. This is mathematically illogical and such fallacy claims can only be made if Satan made a monkey out of the Children of Israel. All animals are no animals when measured against evil (duh) so trans-universal hope is given to us in the spirit of evolution, not Evolution. Darwin can kiss my astral plane.
This text was written by the spirit of evil. The aim is to mix sense and non-sense together, to prove the absence of God of Truth. How it can be debunked? One may ask for a definition of the used term "false death". The satan replies: this is defined in the same text, read more carefully, and if you do not understand it, then you are not smart enough. The reply to it: "I am smart, but I can not find the definition of false death."
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.

I've seen it before - quite apart from the fact that most of your more 'recent' (2010 and 2011) 'publications' seem to basically be posts on forums (at least one of which--that I happened to check--has been removed as spam), what you post here suggests that you've lost the plot somewhere along the way and now you're posting religiously motivated, anti-atheist, anti-science nonsense like this.
 

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
This text was written by the spirit of evil. The aim is to mix sense and non-sense together, to prove the absence of God of Truth. How it can be debunked? One may ask for a definition of the used term "false death". The satan replies: this is defined in the same text, read more carefully, and if you do not understand it, then you are not smart enough. The reply to it: "I am smart, but I can not find the definition of false death."
Sleeping is defeated by the internet.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
If a human says the God of creation is space time and matter then an instant change would own all discussions.

Remembering where your human consciousness is placed as the storyteller is part of scientific reasoning itself.

O pre form God was eternal moving out of eternal which is not O.

It instant burst burnt so is space by light burning time O by mass circular presence. Space time mass present at once.

A human only agrees to count time by O movement mass and cycles O.

So whence God O came from ....still exists. It caused change and minus itself so precedes and encompasses the creation by it's eternal form...not in time space or matter.

The spirit eternal. Gods creator.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
How many theorems in Modern Darwinism? It is the most prominent theory of all science, most well-"proven" theory, but without any theorems with their proofs.

Science doesn't require theorems. This is a mathematical term, requiring axioms. Science requires experimentation to provide evidence that a theory is not false.

If you can provide evidence contrary to the mountains of evidence supporting evolution, then you've got something.

Theorem - Wikipedia.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
You are evading the point. It remains wrong for you to unilaterally declare something as false just because you don't think it fits your faith. It is grossly dishonest for someone who so often claims to be a scientist.
There are gods: satan, and God. All notions are based on them. For example, the proponent of atheism is not God, but god.
 
Top