• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Taliban

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
I reckon the Taliban are a bunch of religious fascists, and I feel sorry for the Afghan people.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Which means that we cannot say that the UN refuses to sanction Saudi Arabia because it is afraid of the US.

Well, with your logic, what you say is true. Which means you have to explore why they are not sanctioning the KSA and why they are doing that to Israel which you had already admitted is "the UN is afraid of the US when considering Israel".
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
Well, with your logic, what you say is true. Which means you have to explore why they are not sanctioning the KSA and why they are doing that to Israel which you had already admitted is "the UN is afraid of the US when considering Israel".
IMHO the UN is antisemitic. But that's another topic for another time.
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
IMHO the UN is antisemitic. But that's another topic for another time.
I think the UN is a conglomerate of competing factions, some of which are pro-Israeli, some neutral, and some anti-semitic.

But they do a good job of exposing Israeli settlements that are illegal according to international law. And I see that as being as important to establishing peace and justice as criticising groups like Hamas is to peace and justice.

In my opinion.
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
The Taliban was trained by their piers who were trained by the foundation of the so called anti fascist movement of the time, vis a vis, the United States primarily.

Weren't the original members educated in madrassas in Pakistan?
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Weren't the original members educated in madrassas in Pakistan?

You mean the Taliban? No. Not necessarily in Pakistan. Just because Taliban means seekers of knowledge that does not mean they were necessarily educated in Pakistan. But it is true that some of them, including the famous Mullah Umar was educated predominantly in a Pakistani school close to the Afghan region.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
You mean anti Israel. Say it plainly. There is no need to use famously used apologetic phrases.
No, I mean the reason that they are anti-Israel is because they are anti-semitic.

Someone who has legitimate concerns about Israel would still apply the same standard to other nations. That is not what the UN does.
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
You mean the Taliban? No. Not necessarily in Pakistan. Just because Taliban means seekers of knowledge that does not mean they were necessarily educated in Pakistan. But it is true that some of them, including the famous Mullah Umar was educated predominantly in a Pakistani school close to the Afghan region.

So when were they "trained" by the US?
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
No, I mean the reason that they are anti-Israel is because they are anti-semitic.

These cliche terms used for propaganda doesnt make any difference IC.

Someone who has legitimate concerns about Israel would still apply the same standard to other nations. That is not what the UN does.

But you did say that the UN should typically be afraid of the U.S in approaching Israel, said in other words.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
I said no such thing. I stated a fact, that the UN was not afraid of the US. I did not say that the UN should be afraid of the US.

Nah. What you said was that "If the UN was afraid of the US, then they should not be sanctioning Israel" indicating they should be. ;) Also indicating something is going on between the U.S and Israel.

No worries mate. Just leave it.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
Nah. What you said was that "If the UN was afraid of the US, then they should not be sanctioning Israel" indicating they should be. ;) Also indicating something is going on between the U.S and Israel.

No worries mate. Just leave it.
You have not quoted me correctly. The word I used was would, which is predictive, not should, which is a value statement. Here is the actual quote:
That makes no sense. If the UN were afraid of the USA, they wouldn't be sanctioning Israel.
This quote simply makes a cause effect link, and noting that the effect is not true, concludes that therefore the cause is not true. IOW, I'm simply stating that since Israel IS being sanctioned, that therefore the UN is not afraid of the US, since the US has repeatedly fought against these sanctions.
 

amorphous_constellation

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that the super powers want to use the area as some kind of footing, but they fail at doing this . This apparently causes a protectionist ethic to emerge in the people who live in the region, making for resistance to outsiders, and probably hard living for those inside, as speech and information is far more regulated. I think maybe the Afghans need a way of making themselves rich, by charging the powers with land and resource uses. From there, they see that healthy economic interaction can build peace and stability, and authoritarian power isn't needed
 
Top