ElishaElijah
Return
Was talking Progressive Revelation of the Bible, as far as I can see the Baha’i is a cult.It is not unscriptural because it is embedded throughout the scriptures of my religion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Was talking Progressive Revelation of the Bible, as far as I can see the Baha’i is a cult.It is not unscriptural because it is embedded throughout the scriptures of my religion.
About 2020 years ago men using pyramid rebuilt temple science shifted earths mass.The Gospel is this: That Jesus Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, that He rose again the third day according to the scriptures.
This is the Gospel message that hasn’t change
This is your claim; nowhere is this stated factually, even in your scripture. Jesus calling them "a den of robbers" in Matthew, Mark, and Luke doesn't make it so, especially as it mentions nothing but commerce. Matthew even has Jesus throwing everyone out of the courtyard of the temple (again, not even inside the temple), including the people who were buying sacrificial animals. So much for just targeting those dirty rotten thieves... I'm half surprised he didn't demand to speak to a manager.They were dishonest and cheating people, that’s why he called them thieves and robbers.
That is because you never look beyond the Bible. What do you expect to see?Was talking Progressive Revelation of the Bible, as far as I can see the Baha’i is a cult.
Paul was not an eyewitness. If there was a purported eyewitness, he or she has left us no account of what was purportedly witnessed. We only have the six irreconcilable second-hand tales of the NT.“For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.”
1 Corinthians 15:3-8 NIV
You’re mistaken there too, a lot of eyewitnesses
.....WHAT!? Two posts of similar; what are you trying to say?An example of men contràdicting self in science thesis.
They do and the whole Bible does
Consciousness men theists used words to contradict coerce self human was safe using gods body crystal mass and transmitters. As science......WHAT!? Two posts of similar; what are you trying to say?
They don't all contain the same stories. Mark's is simple and John's is mystical. They also contradict each other. Unless they changed since I was a Christian.
Probably been 10 times saying the same thing ......WHAT!? Two posts of similar; what are you trying to say?
Paul before:Paul was not an eyewitness. If there was a purported eyewitness, he or she has left us no account of what was purportedly witnessed. We only have the six irreconcilable second-hand tales of the NT.
And this all has.... what to do with the thread topic or anything currently being discussed here?Consciousness men theists used words to contradict coerce self...
Wrong quote but Thirza is correct; the four canonical gospels given contradict one another and differ, despite being a centuries-long game of Telephone.I will refer you to look at The Harmony of the Gospels...
Wrong quote but Thirza is correct; the four canonical gospels given contradict one another and differ, despite being a centuries-long game of Telephone.
The "telephone comment" is accurate to how the canonical gospels were written. It would be like you being expected to recount accurately and truthfully events from the *1980's, then someone who does not speak English taking your account and trying their best to translate it and reproduce it, but they decide that a few things don't really make sense so they "tweak" it a little. Rinse and repeat two more times.Probably be a good idea to actually look at the harmony of the gospels, the telephone comment is only ignorant talk.
Then don’t comment, but God is the author, men of God recorded and wrote as the Holy Spirit in them directed.The "telephone comment" is accurate to how the canonical gospels were written. It would be like you being expected to recount accurately and truthfully events from the *1980's, then someone who does not speak English taking your account and trying their best to translate it and reproduce it, but they decide that a few things don't really make sense so they "tweak" it a little. Rinse and repeat two more times.
I've no interest in seeing yet another (not my first rodeo) example of theological mental gymnastics trying to vainly rectify the contradictions inherent in the gospels alone.
You said you had no interest so why would you comment?I've no interest in seeing yet another
They aren’t contradictions like your opinion suggests but the same stories from different perspectives. And there is no excuse where the authorship of the Bible is concerned. God used men to write and record, God is eternal and the author so it’s not like telephone.God directed them" is the poorest of excuses for the contradictions present, and if such is the case then the holy spirit is a terrible director.
Let me rephrase: I know what it's going to say. Nothing new will be added; I've seen it before.You said you had no interest so why would you comment?
Except for the genealogy of Joseph, what message the angel gave Mary, the date the gospels happened in, where Joseph and his family lived and when, which prophecies were fulfilled, John the Baptist and Jesus, etc... And that's just in the gospels alone.They aren’t contradictions like your opinion suggests but the same stories from different perspectives.