You need to understand what the burden of proof is cOLTER. You're making unfalsifiable claims, providing no evidence, and continuing to engage in the fallacy of poisoning the well. I am not static. My mind can be changed but that requires sufficient evidence of any kind. Unfortunately, we have heretofore been unable to find a mechanism to test the supernatural, if we had, it would simply be referred to as natural and fact. Philosophy isn't super scientific. It's still considered an art. When you have a bachelors in philosophy you have a bachelor of arts. I find all religious people have to fall back on is philosophical hyperbole because as you stated religion cannot be proven objectively. Who's fault is that? gods? Do you want to talk about the argument from divine hiddenness? No, philosophy used to be a valuable tool for the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline. But religious people with little understanding of how to operate these mechanisms have bastardized them into nothing more than word soup. Circular reasoning that goes nowhere and polluted once great ideas with biased reasoning. As someone with a bachelors in theology, an associates in religion, an associates in philosophy, and a current student of law I've studied religions for over half my life and I have not heard anything new for a very long time. Maybe you'll be the first person in 600 years to come up with a brand new argument for the existence of god? Wouldn't that be cool. You may even win a debate with it someday.
