Why do you believe this? You have no empirical evidence, you have only tradition. Biologists have hard, testable evidence.I believe humans were created as told in the Bible. I don’t know the exact date for that.
That's what mutations are. Do you believe differently?Do you think it is true that there happen mutations, alteration in the nucleotide sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA, like explained in: Mutation - Wikipedia?
These 'alterations' occur in all genomes; all species. They're what creates the variation that enables organisms to adapt to changing conditions.Those alterations accumulate in time. The longer humans have existed, the more there will be those alterations. Some believe that is the reason why for example X-chromosome is dying.
A specific mutation might be problematic for an individual, but problem variations are eliminated by natural selection, while beneficial ones are retained populations evolve and adapt.
Please explain your reasoning. Why has this "god genome" not occurred to any of the best minds in biology?That all indicates that there was once god genome that has degenerated in all this time. I think that is one evidence for that humans were created.
What is this god genome? Was it the original genome? Is the human genome, then, a degenerate version of a more perfect. primordial, bacterial genome?
The human genome hasn't deteriorated, it's adapted, just like all genomes do.
On the contrary. All the evidence, from multiple disciplines, indicates great age, and species radiating over time into many different forms -- of which we are just one. All the evidence in nature indicates this, and it is what everyone even remotely familiar with the evidence believes.I don’t believe in the millions of years or that humans have developed. All evidence in nature indicates the opposite, like for example the degeneration of genome.
I don't think you're familiar with the evidence. You don't know understand how we know what we know.
What is your evidence for magical creation?
You don't understand genetics. We have coding for a great many primitive features which are not currently expressed. Unneeded genes are "turned off." Epigenetics - WikipediaIf we would really have DNA coding for gills, we would have gills. We don’t have, therefore I think that is absurd claim that we would have that coding. Maybe we have something that looks similar, but I think it is misinterpret, because we don’t have gills.
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evodevo_02
No!And just because those errors occur all the time, it means there was once form that had no errors and the more those errors come, the weaker people will be.
At what point did this pristine DNA exist? It must have been billions of years ago, long before multicellular organisms existed.
DNA changes are not necessarily errors. Without changes in DNA what would natural selection have to work with? There would be no change; no evolution, no ability to adapt to changing conditions. Without this "degeneration" we'd still be single celled organisms, wouldn't we?