• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Science is a Woman

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
It seems like Science is of a female character. Scientific journals are as illogical and emotional as dates with a woman are. Females in my family are illogical and emotional most of the time. And it makes them good people. I like not the cold-blooded logic but the love.

Not every good candidate gets accepted. Rich and famous lovers with experience have an advantage. And just like a man desires to get inside a good woman, a submitter wants to be published in a good journal. Stephen Hawking, Einstein, and Perelman are favorites, it is forbidden even to criticize them. But I am - an unloved one, I am not even allowed to be published. Although no one can show me my mistakes: "which of you will convict Me of a mistake?" (Jesus Christ).

If some man has convinced me of having a mistake, then I repent and correcting the mistake.
I can not correct a mistake, just because somebody has lied, that I have a mistake there.

Look at the type of mistake demonstration I accept:
I wrote in the paper: 2=5+7.
The editor has replied: the 2=5+7 does not hold.

They have sent me the standard rejection letter "your paper is not clearly written", thus, they have not read my paper at all.
They have not read a single line. Only my Name. Why? Because the Name does not match the names in the Professors' list. Journals act as they are a Woman. Evil one. The dirty Babylon Babe from the Bible.

Somebody told me: "Misogyny and ignorance of science in one package. That's quite something."
I replied: "You defend the honor of science like it is a woman's honor. Hence, science is Babylon Babe from Revelation."


Shadow: Reading over that (being on academia.edu isn't impressive in itself), I can see, quite clearly and easily, why your stuff is rejected.

I reply to her: You are emotional. You are a woman. Journals are of female spirit: because they are emotional. What if not an evil emotion to write me, I am quoting:
"Because so many authors have submitted false solutions to the problem addressed in your manuscript, we can only consider such solutions if the exposition is exceptionally clear...
There is no need to reply to this message." This journal is like a woman because it accepts only chosen, established, experienced, trustful, favorite authors.


Shadow: "No, you're just mad, because you must trust the experts' view on your papers. The papers are not clearly written."

Your advice is harmful. It does not serve my interest. My interest is to get 1 000 000 USD. Your comments do not help to get it. If I surrender to your accusations, I will lose the last chance to get money, because I will consider myself dumb and not talented in Math.

I am not crazy, but this world tries to make me think, that I have lost my mind. But even if I am the single sane person on Earth, I will not believe, that I am crazy.

 
Last edited:

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
It seems like Science is of a female character. Scientific journals are as illogical and emotional as dates with a woman are. Females in my family are illogical and emotional most of the time. And it makes them good people. I like not the cold-blooded logic but the love.

Not every good candidate gets accepted. Rich and famous lovers with experience have an advantage. And just like a man desires to get inside a good woman, a submitter wants to be published in a good journal. Stephen Hawking, Einstein, and Perelman are favorites, it is forbidden even to criticize them. But I am - an unloved one, I am not even allowed to be published. Although no one can show me my mistakes: "which of you will convict Me of a mistake?" (Jesus Christ).

Question not a critique: Do you honestly see your self on the level of Einstein, Hawking or even Jesus?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
It seems like Science is of a female character. Scientific journals are as illogical and emotional as dates with a woman are. Females in my family are illogical and emotional most of the time. And it makes them good people. I like not the cold-blooded logic but the love.

Not every good candidate gets accepted. Rich and famous lovers with experience have an advantage. And just like a man desires to get inside a good woman, a submitter wants to be published in a good journal. Stephen Hawking, Einstein, and Perelman are favorites, it is forbidden even to criticize them. But I am - an unloved one, I am not even allowed to be published. Although no one can show me my mistakes: "which of you will convict Me of a mistake?" (Jesus Christ).


Several people on RF have pointed out glaring mistakes, leaps of faith and inconsistencies in your work, you ignore them. I can only imagine what professionals think.

And a sexist rant is nor going to help
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I recall being blamed for my religious fundamentalism. No more records of "mistakes".


I am sure you do. I personally, who is not particularly expert have pointed out some of your basic "scientific" errors.

One particular problem is your propensity to attribute to faith.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It seems like Science is of a female character.
It may be relevant that the word 'science' comes from Latin scientia (knowledge, knowhow), which is grammatically feminine, as the final 'a' of the word indicates (and why so many girls' names end in 'a').
a submitter wants to be published in a good journal.
That reminds me ─ you said you had a proof of the abc conjecture, so I asked you how you proved it.

How did you prove it?
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
I dont know :) Normally people will answer about their view instead of pointing to an other paper (except of if the person can not answer)
I suspect I am one of the top thinkers of the world because I am writing a lot online. But I am not sure. Thus, I am inviting people to my CV to form their own subjective opinion.
 
Top