(Presuming bribery/flattery or other such wouldn't work when results might be the more important feedback for any such system.)
That is, if one was to place in authority (as to advice or decision-making appropriate for mankind and the things we supposedly valued) an AI system rather than any human authority (which might be bribed in some manner) as to governing over any country or even the world, how could such be done? Surely any suitably advanced AI system would be immune from such bribery?
This of course being just an exercise in possible futures and perhaps unlikely, but many in this field (advanced AI) can foresee such an AI at least being feasible (given time), and taking for granted that few humans are immune from such bribery (or corruption), even if they appear to be so when we elect them - or just being incompetent, and where this too might apply to any AI.
And of course such a scenario (the AI) would only come about if this would substantially increase the chances of better decisions being likely over any other such.
That is, if one was to place in authority (as to advice or decision-making appropriate for mankind and the things we supposedly valued) an AI system rather than any human authority (which might be bribed in some manner) as to governing over any country or even the world, how could such be done? Surely any suitably advanced AI system would be immune from such bribery?
This of course being just an exercise in possible futures and perhaps unlikely, but many in this field (advanced AI) can foresee such an AI at least being feasible (given time), and taking for granted that few humans are immune from such bribery (or corruption), even if they appear to be so when we elect them - or just being incompetent, and where this too might apply to any AI.
And of course such a scenario (the AI) would only come about if this would substantially increase the chances of better decisions being likely over any other such.