• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Covid vaccine. Who took it, who didn't?

have you taken the covid vaccine and trust in it

  • yes, I trust it

    Votes: 26 68.4%
  • no, I don't trust it

    Votes: 9 23.7%
  • undecided

    Votes: 3 7.9%

  • Total voters
    38

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
1. No one says vaccines doesn't work
2. No one says to others dont take it
3. No one denies facts, statistics, etc
4. No one is not caring about thousand people dying
5. No one fell into a conspiracy
6. Not all who choose not to take the vaccine are anti-vaccine people
7. Not all of us care about politics

We do care

1. About others wellbeing insofar we social distance and wear masks where need be
2. We do wash our hands and not touch people
3. We do find it beneficial to take vaccines depending on ones situation
4. We do think for ourselves what's best for our wellbeing via circumstance

5. We all have the rights to make decisions best for our well being
6. We all have the ability to make our own decisions

We can control the attitudes we have about others.
We can "do onto others..." despite our difference.
We can be respectful an accept people's views.

We can also have civil conversation.

Stop spreading hate. Its really not worth it both for you and your immune systems.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I don't care about any of those activities so I don't need a pass.
Yeah. We'll see how well that goes when people start reengaging in social activities with large groups of people. ;)

Unfortunately, I do get out sometimes... Though mostly to the grocery store and mall once in a blue moon. I walk everywhere so no bus. I can't see myself carrying a vaccine card because I'm not near anyone and the buildings I'm in are either too big for any contact or I'm in and out. Walmart is the only place I go to once a awhile and it's usually crowded. I don't see the virus running away just because people took the vaccines (and I agree, for themselves).

I'm not hardpessed to go to Walmart but I do find it may be a political issue when people can't go where they use to without a passport.

I read this yesterday.

How to Convince the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant to Get Vaccinated

It's turned into evangelist behavior. Knowing what's good for others because scientist (or God) says so.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
It's turned into evangelist behavior. Knowing what's good for others because scientist (or God) says so.
You can say that again.
A few days ago I was going to say how similar this behavior is to those Christians who try to convert others to their beliefs.

“We need to understand who is on the fence and we need to get them the information they need to get off the fence and choose to be vaccinated,” she says. “And as a recent New York Times article wisely noted, we need to be clear and positive in our messaging: This is an incredibly effective vaccine, and it will save your life.”

How to Convince the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant to Get Vaccinated

Logically speaking, it will not save my life unless I am at risk of losing my life.
If I am not in a car I cannot get in a car crash. :rolleyes:
That's one reason I never drive on the freeway anymore. I know what is risky and I know what the risks are.
It is hard to believe how much fear the so-called experts have instilled into people, and it worked.

If people are at risk I think they should take the vaccine if they want to but it is none of their business what other people do.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Since you are not qualified to assess the information yourself (as you've admitted) why are you including views that run totally contrary to the overwhelming consensus of the people who are qualified to do so?
I am qualified enough to know how vaccines work, I am not an idiot. I have several college degrees including two MA degrees.

"overwhelming consensus of the people who are qualified to do so"

I do not have to follow the crowd, the crowd is not always right.

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."

This type of argument is known by several names,[1] including appeal to the masses, appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, appeal to democracy, appeal to popularity, argument by consensus, consensus fallacy, authority of the many, bandwagon fallacy, voxpopuli,[2] and in Latin as argumentum ad numerum ("appeal to the number"), fickle crowd syndrome, and consensus gentium ("agreement of the clans"). It is also the basis of a number of social phenomena, including communal reinforcement and the bandwagon effect. The Chinese proverb "three men make a tiger" concerns the same idea. Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia

The converse of this is that if many or most people do not believe it, it cannot be so, and that is fallacious.
Are you going to make such an important choice based on how good various wingnuts mavericks are at propaganda persuasion?
No, I am going to make the decision based upon my own best judgment regarding (a) what I need, and (b) what is good for my body overall. I am not going to act out of fear.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
People just being sensible, doing what is required of them so as not to spread the virus, including being vaccinated and such, is not a universal commodity it seems - witness the protest movements that probably cause upsurges in the virus or where many just think the rules are for 'others'. Tends to happen more in the more right-wing societies, such as the USA, especially when you are still recovering from the Trump era. :eek:

I think if we looked at the likelihood of believing conspiracy theories we might find a correlation too between such individuals.
I am not right-wing and I do not believe in conspiracy theories. I do not deny the science behind the vaccines, I just don't want one in my body unless I need one.

I wonder why nobody sees the obvious, people reengaging in social activities and spreading the virus just because we now have a vaccine. Who is inconsiderate of others, those who go to a stadium packed with thousands of people or someone like me who stays home where I cannot hurt anyone? Who is more selfish?
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
I am qualified enough to know how vaccines work, I am not an idiot. I have several college degrees including two MA degrees.

Good for you - but this is no substitute for specific training in the fields in question.

I do not have to follow the crowd, the crowd is not always right.

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."

It's not an ad-pop because it's about the specific people who are trained to make this sort of evaluation. It's about the weight of evidence. In this case (especially for those of us who aren't world-class experts in vaccination, virology, and epidemiology), the overwhelming consensus of the experts in the field is evidence.

No, I am going to make the decision based upon my own best judgment regarding (a) what I need, and (b) what is good for my body overall. I am not going to act out of fear.

You appear to be doing just that - acting out of fear. This really is a no-brainer. Unless you live the life of a hermit, have a specific medical reason not to take the vaccine, or don't care about any of the following: your own health, the health of those around you, or the state of the health service in your country, the evidence today is crystal clear and it says: TAKE THE VACCINE.

There are no risk-free options but that is the way to minimise the risk.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Unless you live the life of a hermit,

That's basically what's she's saying. By situation not generalizing the whole population as if they have the same level of risk, same situation, same reaction (or should have) to the pandemic, and same health conditions (or assuming if "I can do it so can they" mentality).

Anyone can have fear... the thing is, though, it depends on the mediums and interactions that may or may not bring on fear. Someone can be in fear because they see 100,000 people dead and stats on t.v. rising and falling while someone else's fear may be they have a medical condition and jump every other time someone they think may touch them. Fear can mean denial-oh, there is no pandemic or it could just be being in the unknown.

Some people can't handle, don't know, or don't accept their fears. However, even if we don't, we can at least be aware of our actions, attitudes, behavior, and well-being that even if we fear we know it, address it, and let it leave.

If you have asthma or other lung condition your fear would be different than someone who doesn't and lives in her home all the time. So, people are just different.

Why don't pro-vaccine people get that?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I am not right-wing and I do not believe in conspiracy theories. I do not deny the science behind the vaccines, I just don't want one in my body unless I need one.
I don't want anything in my body either actually (of this sort) but since childhood I seem to have had enough of such, and that didn't seem to harm me (and no doubt prevented much illness or disease), so on balance I tend to trust those who have developed them - even if rather quickly. And when it tends to help all the rest in society - as to fewer dying, and possibly by my spreading the virus - there is hardly a contest. The vaccine wins. And I don't really understand the timing business, like accidents (which do happen to us all), we don't get to choose when such things occur. You are able to foresee all future events? :oops:
I wonder why nobody sees the obvious, people reengaging in social activities and spreading the virus just because we now have a vaccine. Who is inconsiderate of others, those who go to a stadium packed with thousands of people or someone like me who stays home where I cannot hurt anyone? Who is more selfish?
I think one would have to have some proper information on this so as to form an accurate opinion. Most people I come across seem just as careful as they did pre-vaccinated, and the same goes for me since we don't really know how much the vaccines prevent spreading. I will still take the same precautions until it is safe to ignore the issue.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
You can say that again.
A few days ago I was going to say how similar this behavior is to those Christians who try to convert others to their beliefs.

“We need to understand who is on the fence and we need to get them the information they need to get off the fence and choose to be vaccinated,” she says. “And as a recent New York Times article wisely noted, we need to be clear and positive in our messaging: This is an incredibly effective vaccine, and it will save your life.”

How to Convince the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant to Get Vaccinated

Logically speaking, it will not save my life unless I am at risk of losing my life.
If I am not in a car I cannot get in a car crash. :rolleyes:
That's one reason I never drive on the freeway anymore. I know what is risky and I know the risks are.
It is hard to believe how much fear the so-called experts have instilled into people, and it worked.

If people are at risk I think they should take the vaccine if they want to but it is none of their business what other people do.

Yeah. I mentioned in other threads about fear. It didn't really hit me until people started going in the streets and way into the grass to avoid me for couple of seconds walking or running by them. This is outside. So, extend that fear indoors. That and you can get COVID in your eyes...that one floored me. I wouldn't say it's not justified given the situation, but I do feel its overboard in general.

But it's funny, you got the same thought I did about the evangelist thing.

The interesting thing is, pro-vaccine people tend to be a bit more upset than those everyday Joe Smo who choose not to take the vaccine (anti-vaxers seem to be more political, least I'm witnessing) and thing its not their business to tell others what to do.

I don't understand why they don't get that.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Good for you - but this is no substitute for specific training in the fields in question.
I already answered that. I do not need to be trained in the fields in question in order to know how vaccines work.
I do not like they way they work so I am not taking one unless it is necessary.
It's not an ad-pop because it's about the specific people who are trained to make this sort of evaluation. It's about the weight of evidence. In this case (especially for those of us who aren't world-class experts in vaccination, virology, and epidemiology), the overwhelming consensus of the experts in the field is evidence.
I do not care about the consensus, I only care about who is right.
The overwhelming consensus of the experts in the field is only evidence that they agree with each other.
Believers also agree with each other that there is a God. Is the overwhelming consensus of believers evidence that there is a God?

It is ad pop when everyone follows the crowd and believes in something because everyone else believes in it.
You appear to be doing just that - acting out of fear. This really is a no-brainer. Unless you live the life of a hermit, have a specific medical reason not to take the vaccine, or don't care about any of the following: your own health, the health of those around you, or the state of the health service in your country, the evidence today is crystal clear and it says: TAKE THE VACCINE.

There are no risk-free options but that is the way to minimise the risk.
I watch the news constantly and nobody in my country is saying we must take the vaccine. They are only telling us when it will be available. It is only some people on RF that are saying we must get the vaccine.

Risk of what? I am not the one acting out of fear, it is all the people taking the vaccine who are acting out of fear; they are afraid of getting sick, but their real fear is fear of death. I am not afraid of death. I am not afraid of the vaccine either, I just don't want the vaccine. There is a difference. It's kind of like I am not afraid to go on a vacation, I just don't want to go on a vacation.

I do care about my own health and that is why I am not taking the vaccine.
I am not affecting the health of those around me because there is nobody around me except my husband.
The evidence is not crystal clear at all. The evidence regarding this vaccine and its long-term effects upon the individual or the pandemic are not even it yet.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
I listened to the whole video and I will listen to it again as soon as I have time. I am no medical expert and not trained in the biological sciences but I don't have to be to understand logic, which was a subject in which I excelled in college.

I believe in the independent investigation of truth because that is an important principle of my religion, and as such I think everyone should watch this video before they form an opinion. This is a very important subject because this virus and the way we are going about trying to eradicate it could affect the future of humanity. This man is no fanatic and he is not anti-vaccine, so people do themselves a great disservice to assume that is the case based solely upon their own confirmation bias.

I am posting this video again so people can watch it.

Okay I watched most of it.

I'm not a scientist so I don't understand most of what he said, but I I managed to catch a couple of errors anyway:

1.He's suggesting that it's already been established that inoculated people can still spread the virus. Not true: the juries still out on whether or not people have gotten the vaccinations can still spread covid, and the emerging evidence suggests that they can't.

2. His knowledge of history is flawed: he was saying that the first wave of the Spanish flu primarily affected the sick and elderly, just like covid, and then mutated into a second wave that wreaked havoc on younger generations.

Not true: both the infection rate and mortality rate of the the Spanish flu primarily affected younger, childbearing generations. That includes the first wave, so trying to draw such a parallel with the current pandemic is inaccurate at best.

At worst he's being intentionally dishonest in order to sensationalize and help sell his point.

Like I said I'm not a scientist so I can't evaluate most of what he's saying, but I know when I'm being lied to.

Also:

The Doomsday Prophecy of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Geert Vanden Bossche Stokes Fear of COVID-19 Vaccine To Promote His Own Flawed ‘Solution’

Mass Covid-19 vaccination will not lead to ‘out of control’ variants
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Yeah. I mentioned in other threads about fear.

and thing its not their business to tell others what to do. I don't understand why they don't get that.
It is as if we are not allowed to not be afraid. Just because they are afraid we should also be afraid. I get it. It is a lack of boundaries because they cannot separate themselves from other people. It is also a lack of respect and everyday courtesy when people try to tell other people what they should do.

And then they try to twist it and say that we don't care about other people. They no more know what we care about then we know what they care about.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
It is as if we are not allowed to not be afraid. Just because they are afraid we should also be afraid. I get it. It is a lack of boundaries because they cannot separate themselves from other people. It is also a lack of respect and everyday courtesy when people try to tell other people what they should do.

And then they try to twist it and say that we don't care about other people. They no more know what we care about then we know what they care about.
You know, you two sitting in here and passive aggressively gossiping about everybody else in this thread doesn't exactly enhance your credibility.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
You know, you two sitting in here and passive aggressively gossiping about everybody else in this thread doesn't exactly enhance your credibility.

For me, it's airing out grievances. I see that with pro-vaccine/mask people on more threads and posts that I can count. There's nothing wrong with that.

I think if Trailerblazer said something aggressively, there would be probably mod intervention. I've already said my views on its own thread (months ago) and already on this thread as its own post.... so, give us a break.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
I already answered that. I do not need to be trained in the fields in question in order to know how vaccines work.

Your comment about "reprogramming cells" suggests otherwise. Regardless, knowing the basic principles of how vaccines work is not anywhere near enough to evaluate the risks in this situation.
I do not care about the consensus, I only care about who is right.

And the best evidence non-experts have, is what the experts say. It would be different if there was huge disagreement between them but there isn't.
The overwhelming consensus of the experts in the field is only evidence that they agree with each other.

Which means that is the best well informed conclusion, the majority of the experts have somehow made the same mistake, or there is some sort of worldwide conspiracy. This really isn't difficult.
Believers also agree with each other that there is a God. Is the overwhelming consensus of believers evidence that there is a God?

Firstly, that's circular - it's like saying all flat-earthers agree that the earth is flat. Secondly, even believers don't agree with each other about the supposed god. Thirdly, there are no experts in the existence or otherwise of god(s).
It is ad pop when everyone follows the crowd and believes in something because everyone else believes in it.

Yet again: it's not about everyone, it's about those people who are qualified to asses the evidence.
I watch the news constantly and nobody in my country is saying we must take the vaccine. They are only telling us when it will be available. It is only some people on RF that are saying we must get the vaccine.

I'm not telling you you must get the vaccine, I'm telling you that it is irrational not to (unless you fall into one of the categories I indicated before). You are, of course, perfectly free to be as irrational as you want.
Risk of what? I am not the one acting out of fear, it is all the people taking the vaccine who are acting out of fear; they are afraid of getting sick, but their real fear is fear of death.

Utter nonsense. I'm not afraid of death - I'm taking the vaccine because I don't like being sick and it also shows care for my fellow human beings and wider society. It is the only rational option.
The evidence is not crystal clear at all. The evidence regarding this vaccine and its long-term effects upon the individual or the pandemic are not even it yet.

We have strong evidence from similar medications and we know the risks from covid - at least the short term ones, the long-term risks of covid are just as unknown as the vaccine but we have no direct comparison.

Yet again: there is no such thing as a risk-free option but the evidence we have today is unequivocal.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
At worst he's being intentionally dishonest in order to sensationalize and help sell his point.

Like I said I'm not a scientist so I can't evaluate most of what he's saying, but I'm also not an idiot and I know when I'm being lied to.
In do not care who is right and who is wrong and I am not qualified to say. All I can have is a personal opinion. I never went back and watched the video again because it is on a need to know basis and I do not need to know about the vaccine right now because whether I take the vaccine or not is not relevant to my life right now.

The way I look at it, if what he is saying is true, we will find out eventually because what he is saying will happen will happen. Then we'll know.

Do you want to know what I really object to? I object to people calling people intentionally dishonest or calling them liars. You have a right to their own opinion but we can never know another person's motives and we cannot know that they are lying unless that are caught in a lie. I also look at possible motives and what would be his motive to lie and put his career and his reputation on the line?

My impression was that he was sincere even if he was wrong. I am not saying I think he is wrong, I don't know, but it would take a lot of time for me to have an informed opinion on that and I don't have that kind of time.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
For me, it's airing out grievances. I see that with pro-vaccine/mask people on more threads and posts that I can count. There's nothing wrong with that.

There's nothing wrong with wearing socks with sandals either, it's just in bad taste and makes the wearer look like kind of the doofus.

I think if Trailerblazer said something aggressively, there would be probably mod intervention. I've already said my views on its own thread (months ago) and already on this thread as its own post.... so, give us a break.

Just calling it what it is.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
It is as if we are not allowed to not be afraid. Just because they are afraid we should also be afraid. I get it. It is a lack of boundaries because they cannot separate themselves from other people. It is also a lack of respect and everyday courtesy when people try to tell other people what they should do.

And then they try to twist it and say that we don't care about other people. They no more know what we care about then we know what they care about.

Most my political threads throughout the years have always singled out on one or two points: negativity breads hate (and lack of respect, yes), and emotions distort the point(s) people make in their posts... which makes it hard to converse. I've seen it on here and other posts that I can't even count. I like the appeal to people fallacy. Though, a good debate topic, I think it will turn into arguments depending on how people respond to the OP.

Shrugs. I don't even know.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Just how are those who are taking the vaccine doing that for other people?

Everybody who contributes to herd immunity is helping everybody else. The pandemic won't end until a tipping point is reached in which the prevalence of the virus in the community is sufficiently low that even unvaccinated people are unlikely to encounter or contract it.

What you are saying is that it is a moral duty for everyone to get the vaccine regardless of their personal circumstances.

No. What I am saying is that you have a moral duty to get vaccinated unless you have a medical contraindication, and when I say that, I don't mean a self-diagnosis. If all that is stopping you is fear and uncertainty, and you succumb to that and make decisions based on that, there is nothing there to be proud of.

If the shoe was on the other foot and people were asked to do something that that they did not want to do, something that provided no benefit to themselves, in order to help others, you would find out how quickly they would rebel and refuse.

Did you get a rubella vaccine (you may know rubella as German measles)? If so, do you know who you did it for? Not yourself, nor anybody else alive at the time. Do you have children? No need to answer, but if you do, that's who you took it for. Rubella ceased being a threat to you once you were born.

"Rubella is a contagious viral infection best known by its distinctive red rash. It's also called German measles or three-day measles. While this infection may cause mild symptoms or even no symptoms in most people, it can cause serious problems for unborn babies whose mothers become infected during pregnancy."

It is nobody's duty to take the vaccine unless they know they will be in close contact with other people

Can you achieve total isolation from humanity? I think I recall you talking about going to the market, which is more human contact than I've had in over a year until three weeks ago, when I had to go out to receive my first injection of vaccine.

We don't shop because we have access to a service that will shop for us and deliver our purchases to our home, but they do not come inside the house. Their money is already outside waiting for them, where they leave the groceries, and we shout gracias and adios through a closed glass door with everybody masked, going out to wipe down the perishables and bring them in about 30 minutes after they've left. That's the best we could do, but it was enough. Neither of us got sick.

I am hoping to not have to live like that. You seem to suggest that you already do, did so before the pandemic, and will continue to do so after it passes. If so, your circumstances might be unique.

I expect to begin having human contact two weeks after the second shot, but only with small numbers of other vaccinated people at one of our homes, as well as ordering restaurant delivery for the first time in a year. If within a month or two, vaccinated people reentering society more fully than we are doing well, we will likely begin visiting public spaces. If the visit is for longer than it takes to buy vegetables or fill prescriptions, then it will have to be a place that provides protection from other customers that are not vaccinated either by excluding them from entering or sequestering them in remote unvaccinated sections, and preferably outdoor seating.

The vaccine is designed to stop the virus from making you sick.

The virus doesn't prevent infection or mild illness, and it may not prevent spreading virus in those who take it. I had a nice Facebook chat yesterday who chastised me for taking a vaccine that might not prevent infection or transmission after somebody else posted that the vaccine doesn't prevent disease or transmission. I answered, " I took the vaccine for neither of those reasons, because I know you're mostly correct (the vaccine reduces but doesn't eliminate those until herd immunity is reached), so those couldn't be the reasons, could they? Can you imagine any other reasons to get vaccinated?" Then came this:
  • "so you took the vaccine knowing full well you can still catch it?
    1f602.png
    I bet your 1 of them dopey f****s that put there hand in fires to feel for a leak
    1f602.png
    1f926_200d_2642.png
    why are people taking it if it doesn't work? Doctors and science haven't aclue what there on about tho don't they not
    1f602.png
    1f64c.png
    There really aresome stupid people walking this earth
    1f44c.png
    "
I didn't feel like telling him what the value of the vaccine was. I knew it would be pointless, and frankly, I'm losing interest in helping such people even if I can.

But you are nothing like this guy, and so I am happy to share with you. The value of the vaccine is in its preventing severe disease and death, not minor illness, which it also does, but not as well. The numbers like "90% effective" apply to the chances of acquiring the virus once fully immunized, which frankly, aren't good enough to expect to avoid contracting this virus unless it disappears quickly, which the news lets you know won't be happening. I expect to get COVID, but probably from contact with an unvaccinated person, since the prevalence of the virus will be nine times higher in such people than in the vaccinated. But that's OK. I can handle a brief, nonthreatening respiratory illness.

The numbers that really count - rate of prevention of severe and lethal disease - are effectively 100%. That's what we should be looking at.

I just saw a story on the news last night (can't find it on the Internet) about an American family of four. She was already fully vaccinated when their children brought COVID home, and everybody became infected. After some prodding by his wife, the man had actually scheduled his first jab, but felt ill and decided to get a COVID test instead, which was positive, so no shot. He was too late.

He nearly died. The kids, who also tested positive, did well, as did the vaccinated wife. They all became ill, but just a mild flu-like illness. He ended up in the ICU. Just an anecdote at this point, but if we see more of this kind of thing, it will reveal the value of the vaccine. It did not prevent her from getting sick while living with three infected people, but it may have saved her life or an ICU visit.

The risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus. Vaccinated people could potentially still get COVID-19 and spread it to others.

Yes, but the vaccinated person, who cannot prevent acquiring the disease herself, will likely survive. The unvaccinated person she gave it to may not fare quite as well, but that's on him, since he chose to not be vaccinated. He was probably afraid, like the guy in the anecdote above.

It’s not my duty, patriotic or otherwise, to go to war for my country. My country’s working class have been going to war to protect the interests of the ruling classes since 1066, and still the same handful of families own almost all the wealth (much of it squirrelled away overseas to avoid paying tax).

Maybe I should have used the phrase civic duty rather than patriotic.

And I agree that you only have a patriotic duty to defend your neighbors from enemies like the Nazis, but not to promoter or defend the interests of corporations like Chiquita, Dole, Haliburton, and Blackwater. But if we consider a just, defensive war only, do you not feel a duty to those around you to do what you can to help?
 
Top