questfortruth
Well-Known Member
If something can not be disproven, it is a huge plus, it is a positive circumstance. How such a positive fact would take away the scientific status? I bet that 2+2 is 4 can not be disproven, or General Relativity can not be disproven. Is it bad for them? God can not be disproven.
So, it should better be:
1. Science can not be falsified but confirmed.
2. False science can be falsified while running a confirmation test.
ANOTHER TOPIC
I simply say: humans are some apes in Darwinism. Thus, there was no evolution from animal to human.
So, there is no evolution from animal to non-animal.
But there is the transition from non-living to life.
The God-induced evolution has the following stages:
1. Nothing (absence of matter and space and time),
2. Non-living nature (stars, ice, air, dust,...)
3. Living nature (cats, microbes, dogs, trees, rose,....)
4. People.
5. God. Namely: God-like saints.
ANOTHER TOPIC: Will there be money in Heaven?
I argue, that the world ruled by Love needs no money.
ANOTHER TOPICS
A. Sinning does not make one an Atheist?!
Sin is the door for any bad spirit, including the spirit of atheism.
B. The Miracle of Creation is the scientific explanation for any theist because knowledge of a person is defined as information, which has his God. The Atheists have a god - "nonexisting god" is his name. Thus, the atheists are sure, that they have a lack of faith.
C. You might think: "So science is good at saving children and good at killing children depending on the subjective standard. Once we decide on which, that science can do both. It means, it is neutral. It is a neutral method."
I suggest the scientists in Hitler's countries to call "ptisers". Look: there is no single common word between God and satan. So, let Science be the Name of God, but Ptiser - name of satan.
So, it should better be:
1. Science can not be falsified but confirmed.
2. False science can be falsified while running a confirmation test.
ANOTHER TOPIC
I simply say: humans are some apes in Darwinism. Thus, there was no evolution from animal to human.
So, there is no evolution from animal to non-animal.
But there is the transition from non-living to life.
The God-induced evolution has the following stages:
1. Nothing (absence of matter and space and time),
2. Non-living nature (stars, ice, air, dust,...)
3. Living nature (cats, microbes, dogs, trees, rose,....)
4. People.
5. God. Namely: God-like saints.
ANOTHER TOPIC: Will there be money in Heaven?
I argue, that the world ruled by Love needs no money.
ANOTHER TOPICS
A. Sinning does not make one an Atheist?!
Sin is the door for any bad spirit, including the spirit of atheism.
B. The Miracle of Creation is the scientific explanation for any theist because knowledge of a person is defined as information, which has his God. The Atheists have a god - "nonexisting god" is his name. Thus, the atheists are sure, that they have a lack of faith.
C. You might think: "So science is good at saving children and good at killing children depending on the subjective standard. Once we decide on which, that science can do both. It means, it is neutral. It is a neutral method."
I suggest the scientists in Hitler's countries to call "ptisers". Look: there is no single common word between God and satan. So, let Science be the Name of God, but Ptiser - name of satan.
Last edited: