• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Cosmology of the Electric Universe

Status
Not open for further replies.

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Subject: Cosmology of the Electric Universe. Part 1-2

OBS: This OP deals with the factual observations and informations of electromagnetic influences everywhere.


Abstract:
Body of the Sun. Whether in geology, or biology, or planetary science, we find a consensus in the EU community that we all live in a connected Universe, a Universe of worlds within worlds. Hierarchy is a real idea: a cell within your body is not at the same level as your entire body; a star within a galaxy is not at the same level as the entire galaxy. Differences in scale matter, they are real, and they give a complexity and a beauty to existence. In the first of a two-part presentation, Michael Clarage, PhD, Lead Scientist of The SAFIRE Project, illustrates how the electrical systems of the Earth and the planets exists within the larger electrical body of the Sun.

Part 1


Next video about a week.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Subject: Cosmology of the Electric Universe. Part 1-2

OBS: This OP deals with the factual observations and informations of electromagnetic influences everywhere.


Abstract:
Body of the Sun. Whether in geology, or biology, or planetary science, we find a consensus in the EU community that we all live in a connected Universe, a Universe of worlds within worlds. Hierarchy is a real idea: a cell within your body is not at the same level as your entire body; a star within a galaxy is not at the same level as the entire galaxy. Differences in scale matter, they are real, and they give a complexity and a beauty to existence. In the first of a two-part presentation, Michael Clarage, PhD, Lead Scientist of The SAFIRE Project, illustrates how the electrical systems of the Earth and the planets exists within the larger electrical body of the Sun.

Part 1


Next video about a week.

Two comments:

In the first 2 minutes, this video makes some claims about 'being on the same line' versus 'being in a connected collection' that are simply NOT in dichotomy. So the very basis for the criticism is false.

The claim that the Earth's 'electrical system' is connected to that of the sun in some fundamental way would suggest that the 'electrical system' of Venus is even more so because it is at a higher potential than that of the Earth. Yet, Venus has only a very small magnetic field and no evidence of anything like the Van Allen belts. Neither does Mercury, which is even closer to the sun. This alone is enough the show this viewpoint is wrong.
 

Regiomontanus

Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
Subject: Cosmology of the Electric Universe. Part 1-2

OBS: This OP deals with the factual observations and informations of electromagnetic influences everywhere.


Abstract:
Body of the Sun. Whether in geology, or biology, or planetary science, we find a consensus in the EU community that we all live in a connected Universe, a Universe of worlds within worlds. Hierarchy is a real idea: a cell within your body is not at the same level as your entire body; a star within a galaxy is not at the same level as the entire galaxy. Differences in scale matter, they are real, and they give a complexity and a beauty to existence. In the first of a two-part presentation, Michael Clarage, PhD, Lead Scientist of The SAFIRE Project, illustrates how the electrical systems of the Earth and the planets exists within the larger electrical body of the Sun.

Part 1


Next video about a week.


From the SAFIRE website:


"The Electric Sun theory (also Electric Star theory, and Electric Sun Model and Electric Sun Hypothesis) is the idea that the Sun (and stars) derives the main sources of its power electrically from its surroundings, rather than from within by nuclear fusion (the mainstream view)."

Good luck with that. :confused: Seriously, the sun not powered by nuclear fusion?

I watched the whole video. It is a mixture of false statements and assertions. Maybe part 2 will have some meat to it?
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
From the SAFIRE website:


"The Electric Sun theory (also Electric Star theory, and Electric Sun Model and Electric Sun Hypothesis) is the idea that the Sun (and stars) derives the main sources of its power electrically from its surroundings, rather than from within by nuclear fusion (the mainstream view)."

Good luck with that. :confused: Seriously, the sun not powered by nuclear fusion?

It might be difficult to explain the neutrino flux without fusion.

I watched the whole video. It is a mixture of false statements and assertions. Maybe part 2 will have some meat to it?

Good luck with that hope.
 

Regiomontanus

Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
I'd love to see the experimental evidence backing that one up.

By the way, another red flag in the video (if you watched that far) is when he starts claiming that no one was "allowed" to publish these results for years, big conspiracy, etc.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
By the way, another red flag in the video (if you watched that far) is when he starts claiming that no one was "allowed" to publish these results for years, big conspiracy, etc.

Yep. Someone must have died so these things could get out...

Amazing.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
This alone is enough the show this viewpoint is wrong.
And of course you´ve considered this before replying, right?

The Solar EM heliosphere - Heliosphere - Wikipedia
The heliosphere is the vast, bubble-like region of space that surrounds and is created by the Sun. In plasma physics terms, it is the cavity formed by the Sun in the surrounding interstellar medium. The "bubble" of the heliosphere is continuously "inflated" by plasma originating from the Sun, known as the solar wind. Outside the heliosphere, this solar plasma gives way to the interstellar plasma permeating the Milky Way. Radiation levels inside and outside the heliosphere differ; in particular, the galactic cosmic rays are less abundant inside the heliosphere, so that the planets inside (including Earth) are partly shielded from their impact. The word "heliosphere" is said to have been coined by Alexander J. Dessler, who is credited with first use of the word in scientific literature in 1967.[1] The scientific study of the heliosphere is heliophysics, which includes space weather and space climate.

Flowing unimpeded through the Solar System for billions of kilometres, the solar wind extends far beyond even the region of Pluto, until it encounters the termination shock, where its motion slows abruptly due to the outside pressure of the interstellar medium. Beyond the shock lies the heliosheath, a broad transitional region between the inner heliosphere and the external environment. The outermost edge of the heliosphere is called the heliopause. The overall shape of the heliosphere resembles that of a comet – being approximately spherical on one side, with a long trailing tail opposite, known as the heliotail.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Seriously, the sun not powered by nuclear fusion?
This idea is based on Newton´s skewed apple-force of attraction - where he took atmospheric pressure to count for his "universal force".

 
Last edited:

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
By the way, another red flag in the video (if you watched that far) is when he starts claiming that no one was "allowed" to publish these results for years, big conspiracy, etc.
Sarcasm isn´t you stronger quality, is it?
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
And of course you´ve considered this before replying, right?

The Solar EM heliosphere - Heliosphere - Wikipedia
The heliosphere is the vast, bubble-like region of space that surrounds and is created by the Sun. In plasma physics terms, it is the cavity formed by the Sun in the surrounding interstellar medium. The "bubble" of the heliosphere is continuously "inflated" by plasma originating from the Sun, known as the solar wind. Outside the heliosphere, this solar plasma gives way to the interstellar plasma permeating the Milky Way. Radiation levels inside and outside the heliosphere differ; in particular, the galactic cosmic rays are less abundant inside the heliosphere, so that the planets inside (including Earth) are partly shielded from their impact. The word "heliosphere" is said to have been coined by Alexander J. Dessler, who is credited with first use of the word in scientific literature in 1967.[1] The scientific study of the heliosphere is heliophysics, which includes space weather and space climate.

Flowing unimpeded through the Solar System for billions of kilometres, the solar wind extends far beyond even the region of Pluto, until it encounters the termination shock, where its motion slows abruptly due to the outside pressure of the interstellar medium. Beyond the shock lies the heliosheath, a broad transitional region between the inner heliosphere and the external environment. The outermost edge of the heliosphere is called the heliopause. The overall shape of the heliosphere resembles that of a comet – being approximately spherical on one side, with a long trailing tail opposite, known as the heliotail.

Yes. I did. I am NOT ignoring the solar wind.

Did YOU consider the magnetic and electrical properties of Mercury and Venus?
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
What "wind"? It´s called EM radiation.

Um, no. It really isn't. There is a stream of charged particles coming from the sun. it is produced by solar prominences and interacts with the internally generated magnetic fields of the planets. The heliopause is the 'shock wave' of this stream with the surrounding gases just outside of the solar system.


Note: Venus has no internally generated magnetic field. What you are seeing is far, far weaker than what happens with the Earth, contrary to what the EU theory would predict.

In other words, it has been shown to be wrong.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Um, no. It really isn't. There is a stream of charged particles coming from the sun.
And you frequently also empty your light bulbes for EM particles, right? And your particles also changes the solar magnetic polarity every 11 years, right? Wake up man :)
Venus has no internally generated magnetic field.
No planets - or stars for that matter, have an "internal magnetic field".
What you are seeing is far, far weaker than what happens with the Earth, contrary to what the EU theory would predict.
What do you know of what the EU model predicts at all?

Venus is hot and this affects it´s magnetic field and Venus is hot because the solar EM radiation heats up the planet.
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
And you frequently also empty your light bulbes for EM particles, right? And your particles also changes the solar magnetic polarity every 11 years, right? Wake up man :)

The solar wind is mostly protons and electrons. Some alpha particles. NOT E&M.

And no, the solar wind is NOT why the sun's magnetic field reverses every 11 years or so.

And the fact that photons go through the glass of light bulbs is just ignored by you, right?

No planets - or stars for that matter, have an "internal magnetic field".

The Earth does. Jupiter does.

What do you know of what the EU predicts at all?

Venus is hot and this affects it´s magnetic field and Venus is hot because the solar EM radiation heats up the planet.

:facepalm:
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
And the fact that photons go through the glass of light bulbs is just ignored by you, right?
This is the advantage of having no firm definitions. When asked a particle question, you get a particle ansver. And when this doesn´t work as a logical explanation, as in the case of the of light bulbes, you just can define your particle as a wave. Dear oh dear.
The solar wind is mostly protons and electrons. Some alpha particles. NOT E&M.
And then you changes the electric discharges from the Sun all back to particle matters - once again.

"Solar Wind" dear oh dear me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top