• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The concept of sin

VoidCat

Pronouns: he/him/they/them
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.

Though I'm not christian, I was for a good four years before I left as well. I was catholic and being a convert I felt more guilty of sin as a convert than I am now without a tradition.

Nonetheless, a layman's view is for example, say you lie or hit someone. To me, your true nature is good and what led you to lie or hit someone was a combination of maybe how you grown up, environment influences, emotions, and relationship with the person you hit. So, it's external factors that influence your internal state and the goal is to go back to that internal state and approach ill behaviors not something that defines you....

Christianity, on the other hand, is the opposite. Say you're a child and hit someone else. A parent would correct it but most people would say "that's just what 'children' do." That inherent view that children (and even adults) have a default nature to "hit their peer" is what christians call inherited sin. It's a behavior that assumingly stems from how you were born rather than external influences and derailing from parental guidelines and morals.

So, if someone came up to me and said "go hurt that guy over there," to 'me' my good nature says-no don't do so-but if I were a revenge type person my other half may say-it's okay. My good nature supersedes over external influences.

If I had inherited sin (in this analogy), I wouldn't have a good-nature that supersedes external influences. Because the nature to hit someone (aka like childhood) is in my nature, I can either call to god to help me out or give in to the devil and hit the person my peer suggested of me.

I know. Long explanation.

Other religions have a concept of "sin" in that whether mind, heart, person, or external environment there is some idea that we are plagued with external and/or internal influences that we need to look inward or outward for answers. However, even the concept is the same (human nature), I wouldn't use the word for other religions.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.
I think the concept of sin is there regardless of religion. If on the books of the law it says, "Do not rob a bank or you will go to jail" and you rob a bank... it is the literal definition of sin - missing the mark of a moral standard.

A Christian can sin... but that doesn't mean that he goes to Hell... so I'm not sure I understand your statement that someone that keeps a person in Christianity.
 

VoidCat

Pronouns: he/him/they/them
so I'm not sure I understand your statement that someone that keeps a person in Christianity
The threat that if you stop following jesus you go to hell because if you stop following Jesus you still are a sinner and by only following Jesus can you be free from sin... It's at least how I understood it when I was thinking about leaving Christianity I worried if I completely rejected Christ I would go to hell because I was a sinner and by only following Jesus would I avoid that fate...of course it's silly now as that was just an emotional response Id already logically had stopped believing I was only trying to hold on because I still partly believed it and didnt want to let go.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
The threat that if you stop following jesus you go to hell because if you stop following Jesus you still are a sinner and by only following Jesus can you be free from sin... It's at least how I understood it when I was thinking about leaving Christianity I worried if I completely rejected Christ I would go to hell because I was a sinner and by only following Jesus would I avoid that fate...of course it's silly now as that was just an emotional response Id already logically had stopped believing I was only trying to hold on because I still partly believed it and didnt want to let go.

So... what is your solution now for sin?
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.
My opinion follows:

Sin is a concept which appears historically, because often one person hates another. A community in the interest of peace decides that it will handle grievances as fairly as possible but will not allow mortal vengeance. How will they do it? Notice the problem is the murderous impulse, and so to live in peace there must be some effective way to disperse that impulse. Sometimes someone wants to kill someone. It can be for many reasons and is not always rational. Someone might be jealous over attraction or success, or there can be terrible wrongs like thefts. Maybe someone takes your lunch and keeps doing that, and you are outraged. Your heart wants revenge.

For some people this is a problem for the community to resolve together and must be resolved peacefully. How? It will be handled communally through this concept of sin. Thus the concept of sin appears -- a way for the community to bear grievances together, to declare them expunged and to require this to end matters. If an offense cannot be forgiven easily it must be avenged at least in part. Then the sin is forgiven and forgotten. All agree, and it is done. Sometimes sacrifice is involved. Other times shared food and good times are the cure. Sometimes punishment is meted out. Always the result must be agreement all around to put the wrongs behind.

Over time this concept has taken on other meanings and branched. Today we have the word 'Sin'. How we have gotten to where we are today is a very long story.
 

VoidCat

Pronouns: he/him/they/them
So... what is your solution now for sin?
To me sin is the idea that something is an abomination in the eyes of the Divine. Its something that is not only wrong but is in direct rebellion of God...since I worship nature and nothing goes against nature everything is nature sin is irrelevant to me. You dont go to hell for it as I dont believe in the concept. If you do something that is against your moral code you can always change your actions. You can always improve on yourself as we are always learning.Sure some things are harmful but you can always learn improve and better yourself.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.
Sin is deliberate disloyalty to deity.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
So if you believe in sin please explain why.

I don't believe in the classical western concept of 'sin'.

What I do believe in is that some actions have different kind of learning associated with them. If I'm kind and loving, the the consequences are that automatically I attract kindness in return. If I'm hateful and harmful, I attract learning about the impact hate and harm have on others by experiencing it myself.

Of course life is not simplistic but over time that's called sowing & reaping or karma, depending on your preference.

One way it's not simplistic is motivation. Stealing is often considered sinful. But if I'm totally broke and a woman with a young baby and no money begs me to help or her child will die and the only alternative I have is to steal a carton of milk, is that a sin? Not in my book.

Of course people will assert that there are alternatives and there often are, but my statement is not about alternatives but in whether something is intrinsically sinful or not.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.

I was curious too. Reading the OT it seems clear, a sin is breaking God's law. Lots of laws in the OT but it was clear what God's laws were so it was very clear when you broke them.

Christianity taught that sin meant missing the mark. That humans failed to meant the ideal that God wanted from us. Man was imperfect and did not deserve to live in paradise. Since we were imperfect, we could not even pay the price for our imperfection. So God came in the person of Jesus to pay the price that man was not worthy enough to pay for.

One of the reasons I left Christianity, I refuse to allow someone else take on the burden of my imperfection.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.

I honestly dont understand why some people believe in or want to believe in the concept of sin. When I was a christian I believed that anyone who did not repent their sin and turn their life over to Christ would go to hell...now that I am no longer a christian it seems like a good way to have a lot of guilt and to keep someone in Christianity. I know Christianity is not the only religion with the concept of sin but I dont know how other religions view it...So if you believe in sin please explain why...I am not going to try to change your mind I am just asking to try and understand.

"When I was a Christian" can mean something other than what you think. It can mean "when I was taught the things that Christendom believes" which is a whole nuther thing....not to be confused with Christianity at all IMO.

In the Bible, there is no "hell" as it is believed in many churches. "Hell" was introduced as a concept to control the ignorant masses early on....to emotionally blackmail those who were denied access to the Bible, and who had to rely on corrupt leaders to spoon feed doctrinal errors to their flocks. Christendom is the result....the "weeds" that Christ foretold...but the "wheat" never went away.....they were always there in the background and occasionally a brave soul would stand up and make a point and pay with their lives. (like Jesus did and many prophets before him)

"Hell" in the Bible is "hades", which according to the scriptures is nothing more than the common grave of all mankind....we all "go to hell". It is a place of rest where the dead sleep in an unconscious state, according to the Tanakh. (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10) In time, Greek influence changed all that however. The idea of an immortal soul which crept into both Judaism and later Christianity, meant that places had to be invented for these "souls" (who could not die) to go. Some in the early church got really creative......but this notion finds no grounds in scripture.

The ancient Jews did not believe in life after death at all. "Sheol" (hades) was the place where all the dead slept awaiting their resurrection. Jesus said he was going to call all the dead from their tombs.....because they were all still in them. (John 5:28-29) He does not call them from heaven because that is not where God designed humans to live. He placed them in an earthly paradise because this is where they were to live forever.
There is another word erroneously translated "hell" in many Bibles. It is mentioned in the scriptures by Jesus and is called "gehenna" which is not a hell of eternal torment either....it is a place of eternal death....a place from which no one returns.

Jesus used the garbage dump outside Jerusalem's walls to illustrate what happens to unrepentant sinners.
Gehenna was kept burning night and day by the addition of sulfur (brimstone) and the carcasses of dead animals as well as the bodies of executed criminals were cast for disposal. What the flames missed, the maggots finished off. This place represented eternal death because those cast into this fire had no memorial tomb inscribed with their name and lineage, seeing as how they were not considered worthy of a decent burial. To a Jew, this meant God not remembering them in the resurrection and so they would never be restored to life when Messiah's Kingdom would rule the earth.

In the Edenic scenario, death was only mentioned as a punishment for disobedience. There was no natural cause of death until "sin" entered the picture. It is an archery term for "missing the mark". This now meant that humans 'missed the mark' of their original perfection. But not many people understand that there are two kinds of sin mentioned in the scriptures. One is what we inherited from Adam....a genetic problem that came as a direct result of his disobedience. This is the sin we inherited, like a genetic disorder that is passed down from one generation to the next. It causes us to make ill considered decisions at times. This is the sin that Christ came to cancel out by paying for Adam’s sin with his perfect life......this is the "sin" we can't help. (Romans 5:12)

The other kind of sin mentioned is the willful and deliberate kind. This is one that imperfection makes easy, but it is possible to refrain from committing this sin by just following Jesus' directives. There is no way that we can be forgiven for this sin unless we repent.....that means recognizing what that kind of sin is, and avoiding it. If we are weak and give in, Jesus' sacrifice means that we can be forgiven....but only if we are truly sorry for letting down our guard. God knows the heart and will always forgive us if we are genuine in our repentance.

So our concept of sin depends largely on what were were taught as children or as converts to a specific religion.
I was raised in Christendom, but I could not in all conscience remain there.....nothing they taught was actually backed up by the Bible.

I believe that the Bible teaches something completely different to what Christendom teaches.....
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Violating people's free will.
Which is something not even God does.

When David took Uriah's wife, he violated his free will.
It is not that easy not to sin, if you think about it.
Only Jesus succeeded in it because He was God.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Note: not a debate thread..just me trying to understand.
IMO an *understanding* simply comes from living after the basic social and ecological rules.

We individuals cannot live without having a group of persons who lives according to the mutual social and mutual ecological conditions which is embedded in the Creation.

*Sin* is NOT to follow such simple guidelines, IMO. And you don´t even need any religions to rule over you. Just follow the nature and natural social rules.
 

VoidCat

Pronouns: he/him/they/them
"When I was a Christian" can mean something other than what you think. It can mean "when I was taught the things that Christendom believes" which is a whole nuther thing....not to be confused with Christianity at all IMO.

In the Bible, there is no "hell" as it is believed in many churches. "Hell" was introduced as a concept to control the ignorant masses early on....to emotionally blackmail those who were denied access to the Bible, and who had to rely on corrupt leaders to spoon feed doctrinal errors to their flocks. Christendom is the result....the "weeds" that Christ foretold...but the "wheat" never went away.....they were always there in the background and occasionally a brave soul would stand up and make a point and pay with their lives. (like Jesus did and many prophets before him)

"Hell" in the Bible is "hades", which according to the scriptures is nothing more than the common grave of all mankind....we all "go to hell". It is a place of rest where the dead sleep in an unconscious state, according to the Tanakh. (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10) In time, Greek influence changed all that however. The idea of an immortal soul which crept into both Judaism and later Christianity, meant that places had to be invented for these "souls" (who could not die) to go. Some in the early church got really creative......but this notion finds no grounds in scripture.

The ancient Jews did not believe in life after death at all. "Sheol" (hades) was the place where all the dead slept awaiting their resurrection. Jesus said he was going to call all the dead from their tombs.....because they were all still in them. (John 5:28-29) He does not call them from heaven because that is not where God designed humans to live. He placed them in an earthly paradise because this is where they were to live forever.
There is another word erroneously translated "hell" in many Bibles. It is mentioned in the scriptures by Jesus and is called "gehenna" which is not a hell of eternal torment either....it is a place of eternal death....a place from which no one returns.

Jesus used the garbage dump outside Jerusalem's walls to illustrate what happens to unrepentant sinners.
Gehenna was kept burning night and day by the addition of sulfur (brimstone) and the carcasses of dead animals as well as the bodies of executed criminals were cast for disposal. What the flames missed, the maggots finished off. This place represented eternal death because those cast into this fire had no memorial tomb inscribed with their name and lineage, seeing as how they were not considered worthy of a decent burial. To a Jew, this meant God not remembering them in the resurrection and so they would never be restored to life when Messiah's Kingdom would rule the earth.

In the Edenic scenario, death was only mentioned as a punishment for disobedience. There was no natural cause of death until "sin" entered the picture. It is an archery term for "missing the mark". This now meant that humans 'missed the mark' of their original perfection. But not many people understand that there are two kinds of sin mentioned in the scriptures. One is what we inherited from Adam....a genetic problem that came as a direct result of his disobedience. This is the sin we inherited, like a genetic disorder that is passed down from one generation to the next. It causes us to make ill considered decisions at times. This is the sin that Christ came to cancel out by paying for his sin with his perfect life......this is the "sin" we can't help. (Romans 5:12)

The other kind of sin mentioned is the willful and deliberate kind. This is one that imperfection makes easy, but it is possible to refrain from committing this sin by just following Jesus' directives. There is no way that we can be forgiven for this sin unless we repent.....that means recognizing what that kind of sin is, and avoiding it. If we are weak and give in, Jesus' sacrifice means that we can be forgiven....but only if we are truly sorry for letting down our guard. God knows the heart and will always forgive us if we are genuine in our repentance.

So our concept of sin depends largely on what were were taught as children or as converts to a specific religion.
I was raised in Christendom, but I could not in all conscience remain there.....nothing they taught was actually backed up by the Bible.

I believe that the Bible teaches something completely different to what Christendom teaches.....
I've heard of some of this since I deconverted from Christianity...I should look more into this.:)
 
Top