• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do we really KNOW *gravity*?

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Subject: Do we really know gravity?

OBS: BEFORE replying, try to think outside the squared boxes.


We think that a mass automatically creates gravity. The problem is that gravity is an energy. It requires energy to make it. Newton did not explained that. And it is STILL not explained today.

Gravity must have an energy source to be created. Our laws of physics tell us that but we have ignored this fact.

The data indicates that hydrogen and helium make up nearly all of the nuclear matter in the universe. The most abundant element, hydrogen, accounts for 74% of the mass while helium contributes 25%. Heavier elements comprise less than 1% of the total.

How does this fits with the *gravity* suggestions?

Again, gravity is not free. That is impossible. Other explanations are needed!

What are your thoughts of this?
 
Last edited:

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
Gravity's a field, isn't it? A field which creates potential energy.
I don't think they've been able to observe gravitons.
 
Last edited:

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Gravity's a field, isn't it? A field which creates potential energy.
I don't think they've been able to observe gravitons.
Graviton is the hypothetical quantum of gravity, an elementary particle that mediates the force of gravity.

This definition is going nowhere and around in circles: It STIIL don´t explain the suggested forces.

And *a field of gravity* still don´t explain HOW the field got it´s forces.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Subject: Do we really know gravity?

OBS: BEFORE replying, try to think outside the squared boxes.


We think that a mass automatically creates gravity. The problem is that gravity is an energy. It requires energy to make it. Newton did not explained that. And it is STILL not explained today.

Gravity must have an energy source to be created. Our laws of physics tell us that but we have ignored this fact.

The data indicates that hydrogen and helium make up nearly all of the nuclear matter in the universe. The most abundant element, hydrogen, accounts for 74% of the mass while helium contributes 25%. Heavier elements comprise less than 1% of the total.

Again, gravity is not free. That is impossible. Other explanations are needed!

What are your thoughts of this?


Gravity is not in itself an energy but creates potential energy
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
It doesn't distract from your intention. The song came to my mind when I saw the thread title.
My favorite song for about a week or two while going through a divorce.:)
I´m sorry. But this OP is NOT about your personal conditions at all.

Delete your post now!
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
Subject: Do we really know gravity?

OBS: BEFORE replying, try to think outside the squared boxes.


We think that a mass automatically creates gravity. The problem is that gravity is an energy. It requires energy to make it. Newton did not explained that. And it is STILL not explained today.

Gravity must have an energy source to be created. Our laws of physics tell us that but we have ignored this fact.

The data indicates that hydrogen and helium make up nearly all of the nuclear matter in the universe. The most abundant element, hydrogen, accounts for 74% of the mass while helium contributes 25%. Heavier elements comprise less than 1% of the total.

How does this fits with the *gravity* suggestions?

Again, gravity is not free. That is impossible. Other explanations are needed!

What are your thoughts of this?
Why is this in the "Science and Religion" thread?
I can understand the science angle ... but religion?
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
Graviton is the hypothetical quantum of gravity, an elementary particle that mediates the force of gravity.

This definition is going nowhere and around in circles: It STIIL don´t explain the suggested forces.

And *a field of gravity* still don´t explain HOW the field got it´s forces.

If the physicists haven't worked it out yet, I don't think we'll have much luck.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
But, this thread is for discussing religion v science
You´re correct there :)
I`ll ask the admin to simply delete this thread - It´s ruined anyway by some debaters who can´t understand an OP.
 
Last edited:

epronovost

Well-Known Member
It´s neither a force too.

Please define what a force is. This decleration seems absurd. Gravity is definitely not an energy form since it's a wave field.

PS: Have you read on the Higgs field? It could provide some solution to your problem.
 
Last edited:
Top