A pertinent question?

[beenherebeforeagain]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

 

[rational experiences]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

Meaning a human is a human.

Present.

Human claiming human.

Not being a whole human witnessed today in two conditions.

Humans sacrificed partial healthy body..of flesh cells ...blood and bones missing. Human off earth. Humans not present.

What came on earth?

UFO alien.

My human life taken off planet God.

Space dark cold.
Space dark and hot.

Night time cold gases cold space highest history evolution.

Night time gas burning UFO cause seen. Proof vacuum cooled down night time sky but not enough for human health.

What we always knew as humans doing all assessments present.

 

[rational experiences]

One condition God...its heavens and humans present by day knew.

We are not Satan history in space.

We were not Satan self consuming becoming alien...Satan's destruction.

We lived in evolution cold history owned naturally. Science took it away from us in present. Gave us eviction

 

[Bear Wild]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

It is what is expected in evolutional theory and often misunderstood by those who try to claim the unidirectional progression of microbe to man but instead it is like instead of the entangled tree with limbs diverging and other more distant limbs converting. Humans did not evolve from monkeys instead they all branched out with variations. The multiple humanoid species also may have had interactions with each other, the extent we will not know. What this does show is how the creative forces of nature are not in a purposeful direction but do create the amazing diversity. Just hope most will survive the sole surviving species of hominoids.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

Really, I was just pointing out the ambiguous nature of the headline...

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

Why is it important to you? Would you be happier with more or fewer?

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

given the unintended ambiguity of the headline, I'm more interested the species of early humans that were OFF of the Earth...

(Note the forum that this thread is posted in...)

 

[Sunstone]

Why is it important to you? Would you be happier with more or fewer?

It's as @Wild Fox points out, evolutionary theory would predict as many branches of Homo as roughly the number of available niches. Hence, knowing the number of species and how that number might vary over time offer evidence for several things.

I'm guessing we both have a good idea why creationists fail to routinely use the existence today of only one branch of Homo as evidence calling into question human evolution. Funny how stuff like that escapes their attention. Guess they're too busy harping about no transitional species in the fossil record to notice what there is actually merit to say.

 

[Brickjectivity]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

My idea is that they could settle this question (of whether something is a different species) by using the amount of time isolated as the primary determining factor rather than phenomenology or genetics or ability to breed. Scale it by the reproductive cycle of the species to try to get a fair estimate of how fast things change in each species, and that should be one of the major attributes of each species. So now your species has a classification: Time of isolation from its previous major group, When that separation occurred, Reproductive cycle and how quickly it changes during its isolation. 4 quantities that together can actually tag a species without reference to anything else.

 

[Sunstone]

Really, I was just pointing out the ambiguous nature of the headline...

I'm sure you were. In fact we're all sure you were. Here on RF, we're all your friends, and we're all sure you were, and we're all very concerned about these thoughts you've been having about what you have been pointing to recently. UFOs, for instance. How long have you been pointing to UFOs? Would you like some decaf coffee while we call some kind and gentle people in nice white clothing who want to show you their little slice of utopia on earth where you'll have plenty of time to talk about UFOs with the many new friends you'll be making? Do you take cream and sugar? Ooops! We don't think sugar would be just right for you now. Maybe in a few years.

 

[rational experiences]

Basic common sense.

Science says it's thoughts designs are abstract to natural.

Live consciously like we do.

Says natural is mass. Spirit in science gases.

Humans not science live inside water mass.

Science says mass keeps my human life safe whilst abstract science is applied.

Same reasoning for any human.

Science never spoke on behalf of natural mass.

Says a commentary if abstract information just because you can. As a human in a human life

Remove the scientist.

No commentary. No invention. A peaceful healthy human life.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

Only one so far as I know. And then only briefly on the moon and in orbit.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

According to LiveScience:

How many early human species existed on Earth?

How many early human species existed on Earth? | Live Science

Kind of implies something...Really, if so, isn't the more interesting question, "How many early human species existed OFF Earth?"

Sorry. The question was about early human species. I suppose it depends on how early and if you define us as early but the only extant species. Then it would either be none or one, depending.

 

[ChristineM]

How many early human species existed on Earth?

At least 10 homo genus, all but one extinct now.

 

[Revoltingest]

given the unintended ambiguity of the headline, I'm more interested the species of early humans that were OFF of the Earth...

(Note the forum that this thread is posted in...)

If you must explain the humor, you've failed utterly.

 

[Revoltingest]

At least 10 homo genus, all but one extinct now.

If they were homos, how did they reproduce?

 

[ChristineM]

If they were homos, how did they reproduce?

Presents, wine and dine, romance...

 

[Sunstone]

At least 10 homo genus, all but one extinct now.

WHAT? Our ancestors were homosexuals? Are you sure? What does the Supreme Court have to say about this? They're the ones responsible for upholding Biblical truths now. Trump finally got enough Godly judges on the bench to make the Bible the American Constitution, which is what the Founders wanted in the first place. I'll wait until they weigh in, thank you,

 

[ChristineM]

WHAT? Our ancestors were homosexuals? Are you sure? What does the Supreme Court have to say about this? They're the ones responsible for upholding Biblical truths now. Trump finally got enough Godly judges on the bench to make the Bible the American Constitution, which is what the Founders wanted in the first place. I'll wait until they weigh in, thank you,

Luckily genetics is not dictated by the christian right in america

 

[Bear Wild]

Really, I was just pointing out the ambiguous nature of the headline...

And here I thought you were bringing up a fascinating and misunderstood aspect about human evolution. I really need to look at the sections these are listed under. Oh well. Still very interesting topic.