Isn't this the sign that Feminism has slightly got out of hand...in the US?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Replace both with offspring.
"Reason" becomes "reaoffspring".
The whole subatomic particle zoo must be renamed, eg, boson, meson.
Males?...you know...episodes like this makes me incredibly proud of being a heterosexual woman who adores males.
UN women. Guys...are they serious? To begin with there are businesswoman...and congresswoman. It is English.
View attachment 46821
"Landlord" & "owner" have different, albeit overlapping meaningsUN women. Guys...are they serious? To begin with there are businesswoman...and congresswoman. It is English.
View attachment 46821
"Landlord" & "owner" have different, albeit overlapping meanings
in real estate. As a fee manager, I was the landlord of a property,
but not the owner. The owner, was not the landlord, but was my
client.
If people want to change the language to make it more PC,
they should first understand what the Heck they're doing.
And then, question whether the change is useful or mere
lamely superficial.
...or "businessman" and "representative" are not the same thing in Commercial Law."Landlord" & "owner" have different, albeit overlapping meanings
in real estate. As a fee manager, I was the landlord of a property,
but not the owner. The owner, was not the landlord, but was my
client.
If people want to change the language to make it more PC,
they should first understand what the Heck they're doing.
And then, question whether the change is useful or mere
lamely superficial.
It's the language used in the industry.And these are notions of Private Law. Juridic concepts.
Those terms appear to apply only in a limited sense...or "businessman" and "representative" are not the same thing in Commercial Law.
This is the second time you've said this. IQ scores of these people (which you don't even know, by the way, so how do you know they are "high?") has as much to do with what happened as the word "men" has to do with "Amen." I am sorry, but you are just shooting yourself in the foot here. This whole thread is now dumber.How do people keep having a high IQ scores, if they say such prayers?
Yes...what I meant is that UN women probably doesn't know how important it is to distinguish between landlord and owner, juridically speaking.It's the language used in the industry.
And it comports with what I've seen in court.
Why did you choose to open the thread with an outright lie? Isn't baring false witness a sin?The government is dictating you on how to pray. Will you follow Absolute Truth even under fear of the death penalty?
I am in support of such a pronoun and we already have many from which to choose. Just seems to be hard for it to catch on and even worse when some folks flip out over it even existing, when it seems logical to have one.Reasons English Needs Gender Neutral Singular Pronouns, Exhibit #3847273.
I am in support of such a pronoun and we already have many from which to choose. Just seems to be hard for it to catch on and even worse when some folks flip out over it even existing, when it seems logical to have one.
Why did you choose to open the thread with an outright lie? Isn't baring false witness a sin?
Then maybe the OP should have said anything about that point rather than spouting lies and generic insults. If you consider the actual topic so important, I would have thought you'd find such a flawed and trashy opening post as frustrating as I did.Ok...but the point is another one.
Um...Ok...but the point is another one.
We saw a Christian minister mispronounce a sacred word Amen, and because of this war on the word man, male...for what they represent.
It is an important word.
The government is dictating you on how to pray. Will you follow Absolute Truth even under fear of the death penalty?