• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Trump you post on youtube?

Nimos

Well-Known Member
Just noticed that this was posted on youtube (3 hours ago) on Trumps channel and that it is not being broadcast? At least some in the comments said that.

 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
There is something deeply wrong here. I'm not at all prepared to even admit this is real. So far, only the UK tabloid Daily Mail has referenced it. It sure looks like Trump, sure looks like the White House, but I'm not quite prepared to opine on anything else ---

--- except that, true to form, he made an enormous number of claims, and presented not a crumb of evidence.
 

Ponder This

Well-Known Member
Just noticed that this was posted on youtube (3 hours ago) on Trumps channel and that it is not being broadcast? At least some in the comments said that.


I saw the video reported in the news. It was posted on Trump's facebook.
 

Ponder This

Well-Known Member
6 minutes in....so far it's falsehood, falsehood, falsehood, falsehood, falsehood...who believes anything this guy says?

If these states can't do a simple signature check on their votes?
Most of the Millions of his supporters will believe it.

And honestly, even if you don't believe it, election integrity is far too important to refuse to verify its integrity in the face of such a claim.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
If these states can't do a simple signature check on their votes?
Most of the Millions of his supporters will believe it.

And honestly, even if you don't believe it, election integrity is far too important to refuse to verify its integrity in the face of such a claim.

By simple signature check, do you mean a recount? Several states/counties have done that, I believe.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If these states can't do a simple signature check on their votes?
Most of the Millions of his supporters will believe it.

And honestly, even if you don't believe it, election integrity is far too important to refuse to verify its integrity in the face of such a claim.
That is not possible. In fact it is illegal.

For mail in ballots the envelope is separated from the vote once it is verified. They have to be since the vote is anonymous. One cannot know who a particular individual voted for.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
If these states can't do a simple signature check on their votes?

The poll workers check the signature when the ballots are opened and separated from the ballot. By law this protects the confidentiality of the ballot. Audits and recounts no longer have a signature on the ballot
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
There is something deeply wrong here. I'm not at all prepared to even admit this is real. So far, only the UK tabloid Daily Mail has referenced it. It sure looks like Trump, sure looks like the White House, but I'm not quite prepared to opine on anything else ---

--- except that, true to form, he made an enormous number of claims, and presented not a crumb of evidence.
In this news article too - from the Express:

FURIOUS Trump demands Supreme Court intervene and ‘overturn’ the election ‘immediately’
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
He considers the election a nationally organized fraud.
He has no choice at all but to believe that. To accept that the election was essentially fair would require him to accept the fact (and it is a fact) that he actually LOST. Donald's peculiar view of himself would never permit such an acceptance.
 
Top