• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump's Secret Agenda...Kill The Electoral College

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Ah yes, the old "Trump is playing 4D chess" hot take.

Yeah, no. Trump cares about #1. He's a narcissist. He doesn't like being told no. He wants to win. That's the beginning and end of these desperate gasps for relevance.
You underestimate his magnanimity. His whole invented persona
of wannabee dictator led to this moment of clarity regarding the EC.
Who knew that his dubious claim to be a genius was actually true, eh.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
You underestimate his magnanimity. His whole invented persona
of wannabee dictator led to this moment of clarity regarding the EC.
Who knew that his dubious claim to be a genius was actually true, eh.

There was an easy way for him to undermine the EC. Concede 4 years ago to the person who earned more votes than him. The same avenue is available to him now.

If you think that guy is a genius, I'd hate to see what you think an idiot is like.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
There was an easy for him to undermine the EC. Concede 4 years ago to the person who earned more votes than him. The same avenue is available to him now.

If you think that guy is a genius, I'd hate to see what you think an idiot is like.
His genius is recognizing that the EC's flaws needed more
disclosure than in the 2016 election. And in planning this
carefully engineered loss, which enabled open conspiring
with party members to legally threaten snatching a win.
His IQ must be.....amazing.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I don't think he's a genius over this. He's a spoiled little ***** used to yes men, finalizing scripts, and being able to use his money to get his way. Now he has none of that, he finds himself irrefutably defeated, he has a loss he can't brush away, there is no taking the money and running, so he's throwing childish and outlandish tantrums to still get his way like the narcissist twat he is. It's not genius, it's "me Trump. Me first. Me push and shove to front."
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
This isn't just my personal preference.
Objectively, I observe that people generally benefit.

You are objectively stating that the amendments have served EVERYONE well?

But I find it particular that you've chosen "observation" as your concluding response. How many people have you observed in such cases?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
So you are stating that you are objectively stating that the amendments have served EVERYONE well?
"Everyone" is an ambitious word.
Note my use of "generally".
But I find it particular that you've chosen "observation" as your concluding response. How many people have you observed in such cases?
Thousands.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
His genius is recognizing that the EC's flaws needed more
disclosure than in the 2016 election. And in planning this
carefully engineered loss, which enabled open conspiring
with party members to legally threaten snatching a win.
His IQ must be.....amazing.

I genuinely can't tell if you're joking.

Well done? Lol.
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
"Everyone" is an ambitious word.
Note my use of "generally".

Thousands.

Ok, I can agree with you on the generally.

But I feel strongly that some of our amendments are antiquated and can be updated to serve our modern lives better.

Just stating that something is good could be inferred as it is good enough, which I'm not saying you've done.

But our amendments can still be better.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You underestimate his magnanimity. His whole invented persona
of wannabee dictator led to this moment of clarity regarding the EC.
Who knew that his dubious claim to be a genius was actually true, eh.
Who knows how many internet tele-psychiatrists are out there, nailing it on every disagnosis!
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
What a completely weird response.

Do you want to talk about the amendments or not?

Otherwise, you can save your one liners for other folks.

If you're going to suggest to me, to not touch the amendments, I would expect a reasonable why behind that.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You are objectively stating that the amendments have served EVERYONE well?

But I find it particular that you've chosen "observation" as your concluding response. How many people have you observed in such cases?
The second is a real thorn in the side for gun control folks
 
Top