Anywho! I don't like "female goddesses", or "male goddesses" for that matter (though I like them more than female goddesses. I don't like the word Goddesseseseses either.
Here is why:
Male and Female I've understood as being related mainly to the biological features of creatures, and in humans, to the sexual features that develop based on hormones and genetics and whatever, put more simply, a dicky and a pussypuss (pardon my Greek).
Dicks and Pussypusses (kind of reminds me of the word Godessessesses), can relate to things besides themselves, and be used as examples or references to lots of ideas, but when it comes down to it, they are animal reproductive organs, and animals don't appear to me to be very powerful or important in the overall scope of things, there are far more "dickless atoms" as I call them, than there are dick endowed entities, or quite frankly dicks, and pussypussesses as well. Not that population necessarily counts or means much, but I just find that these sexual organs by themselves are not that significant overall, and that is the only thing really distinguishing a male from a female for the most part, throughout human history (besides other hormonal features and genetic tendencies that differentiated them in some humans and animals).
I don't really subscribe much to the idea of "gender" as very "real", but more of a fluctuating cultural trope or stereotype, which may be based again in these hormones and chemicals and genetic biological trends and tendencies which have built up, and things that resulted from them which became cultural tropes. I'm also not that fond of people over-subscribing to these gender stereotypes or "girls are like this and do this, guys are like this and do this", and I find that in my experience of girls, they are very, very similar to guys, or I'm just like a girl maybe, but whatever the case, they seem to be largely the same, except that I'm the more horny and predatory usually, which I credit to the hormones and the way they work sometimes and other factors.
So, that being said, I don't think the "Sun" has a real gender or biological sex. I don't think the "wind" does either. I don't think "Honor" does either. I think if anyone literally thinks they do, they might not be too sharp in my opinion, because, uh, what? It would need some proper justification, and could only at best (by my standards) be that, such and such might be a tendency seen with males or females because of their hormones or cultural associations through time or some kind of excuse, but overally I find the whole notion to be misleading and mostly a bad idea.
I dislike Goddesses more than "Gods" because they seem to pinpoint or make it seem more the case that a sex difference is being made, where as male seeming deities are quite often seeming to be the most "general" or "basic" in the language used of them and imagery made of them (since females can also look male-like, but males generally don't typically have breasts, but of course they can at times). The Goddesses seems to make the case much more that "This is a female, there is a Sex Difference, Lets Talk Biology" compared to the standard and perhaps more frequent "male", which seems to be able to stand for both "female and male" personalities (since in my view they differ very little in actuality).
I already dislike anthropomorphic imagery and symbolism a great deal, but even more do I dislike what sorts of things have typically been associated with the female as a stereotype, such as the notion of "passive reception" which I don't think is appropriate for God really, which does not appear to me as passive ever in any real sense or receiving anything, the Unconditioned is not Acted Upon, but Acts Upon.
Luckily, the majority of associations made with females in the past, was to depict the feminine linked more to "untamed" and "wild", even "violent" behavior, as compared to the tropes of the "Gentle" and "Loving" "Mother" that people might think of Mary with for example and was not at all like the long history of "female" being a code word for "nutjob" basically, possibly due to the hormones and wild phases in female animals or animals defending their young or in heat and pre-menstrual agitation and whatever else, so that if someone wanted to talk about the "Wild and Untamed" version of something, they might talk about it as "Female" whereas the more Tamed and Civilized or Calm version might be linked more to some sort of "Male" imagery. Anything which tended towards the "Female" was quite often "emotional, erratic, unstable". Ergi, as some called it, much later on, though the idea seemed very common throughout history and all over the world.
Anyway, females figures were quite frequently villainized and demonized and turned into monsters or deadly beings quite frequently as well (and still are), though it was also common for people to love and respect their mothers, most of the "divine" feminine associations were frequently disturbing in some way, either part of some disturbing story, or directly part of executing acts of violence or chaos or generating monsters or being part of some controversies. It is also more than likely that a great many of the names associated with female entities were considered pretty negative, and only a minority were not put (at some point) in the category of "terrible / terrifying".
The names of these entities, and what they tended to refer to by their names, epithets, or attributes and symbols, seem to not have generally ever really been things with genitalia, actual biological features, or sensibly any genders, as the things being mentioned were not things typically understood to actually have such features in their apparent forms.
Female figures or figures that would become "feminized" quite regularly would become the dominant figure in some cults, all around the world.
I believe in Athena and that Athena is real even and refers to something that is actual and can be explained, but that the symbols pertaining to Athena are just referential, like the word itself, and do not represent "the actual Athena" or "Athena's actual appearance", which is no appearance at all really, as I don't believe Athena is a physical, material being or organism, but is God and God's attribute of "God's Wisdom" for example, and also representing and encompassing a great many other themes as well, but primarily seems to have been associated with Wisdom and Strategy and Wit and even proper action. Hera may have represented the proper Order and Conduct and Tradition, and many of these traits can be seen repeatedly through the actions and statements where they act as the representative archetype for whatever themes they represent, in stories like the Iliad for example, or Plays and various things like that.
We all depend on Athena daily, and when Athena takes away our sensibility, and leaves us with impropriety and senseless madness or uncontrolled actions, we may find ourselves lost and uncivilized seeming, or otherwise mad and transgressive. Those who don't call upon and use their Athena, basically don't honor Athena, and may lose their Athena, and in doing so, be the losers overall!