Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
an image is a 'still' a snap-shot so to say, which does not reveal motion [paradoxically]if all images/reflections of god are correct because god created them, what then is allowable of forcing the image of one created image upon another; if all are of the same?
what is the image, if "I AM" the image?
an image is a 'still' a snap-shot so to say, which does not reveal motion [paradoxically]
static processing will never compute dynamic patterning as it deals in "stills"
love is a motion/action that has no exclusive form/image. love's center is everywhere and it's boundary is no where. the love that can be defined is not the enduring love.just a door, since, who has seen the image of God?
the maps are never the territory.
View attachment 43177
I think what you're missing, my dear friend, is that not all images/reflections are good. According to the Genesis story, when God created the heavens and earth, God wanted to see the good. But Tanach doesn't say the same about Darkness.if all images/reflections of god are correct because god created them, what then is allowable of forcing the image of one created image upon another; if all are of the same?
what is the image, if "I AM" the image?
no.like the ophanim?
if all images/reflections of god are correct because god created them, what then is allowable of forcing the image of one created image upon another; if all are of the same?
what is the image, if "I AM" the image?
Look in the mirror.what is the image, if "I AM" the image?
forcing
Look in the mirror.
I'm not trying to be funny, but I do seriously have to wonder that maybe a "piece" of God is within us, whether that be called a "soul" or "inner light" [Society of Friend's-- Quaker's] name for this], etc.