• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scientific American Backs a Presidential Candidate

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Well, the Pubs have been attacking science for quite some time now, so this doesn't surprise me one iota.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
This will just get a few more anti-science sheeples to make sure they get out and vote.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
"I think it'll start getting cooler" ARGH !!!!!!!


Maybe the funniest line ever, less than a minute into this short video..
 
Last edited:

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
For the 1st time in 175 years, the scientific magazine has opted to endorse someone for president. looks like the nerds are taking a stand against the children of belial?

Huh?!?!?! belial?????



Scientific American is one of the most reputable science journals available to the general public

Qanon endorses Trump.


would you vote for a snake oil salesman or a doctor that has been trained in scientific methods?

The snake oil salesman is in the White House.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
For the 1st time in 175 years, the scientific magazine has opted to endorse someone for president. looks like the nerds are taking a stand against the children of belial?


Scientific American backs Biden in its 1st presidential endorsement


would you vote for a snake oil salesman or a doctor that has been trained in scientific methods?

No one could blame them when they see the president silencing scientists, altering research reporting for his own gain, denying the critical science of climate change placing the world at risk, and going against scientific advice in every campaign rally. They can only imagine what is next - detaining scientists who disagree with his opinions in correctional camps to recognize their errors?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Would it make more sense for them to back the candidate with an anti-science agenda? :rolleyes:

It makes perfect sense for a science magazine to fight against scientific illiteracy. I don't want to see my dopey country get even dopier, either.
Its called buying the endorsement.

Wonder how much they paid executive staff editors and managers over there to run it?
 
Top