Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
My question is for the some who don’t.do you mean to ask?
do scientists ....believe in God
some do
as a rogue theologian.....I believe in God
BECAUSE of science
Cause and effectMy question is for the some who don’t.
Why some don’t ?
Elaborate this please
Why believe in a god or goddess?My question is for the some who don’t.
Why some don’t ?
Elaborate this please
What about scientists ? they are NOT methodology.Science is a methodology; it doesn't "believe" in anything.
Op asks the difference between, NOT the relationship between.Science believes what it finds evidence of. If it found a god it would no doubt put him under a microscope.
Science is interested in "how?" not "who?"
how about?Op asks the difference between, NOT the relationship between.
So, tell the difference between finding cause of creation vs finding God.Why believe in a god or goddess?
Well this also confirms that scientists believe in God.how about?
God (who) did it
and science explains ....how .....He did it
What about scientists ? they are NOT methodology.
It depends. If you are talking about a creation story then we are talking about myth, If you are talking about how life came to be on the Earth then you have the methodology of science that helps understand how nature works and our connection with it. If you are talking about a god or goddess then you are talking about a personal belief. Myths and personal beliefs cannot be tested with the scientific method. How nature works and how we came into existence and our relationship to the rest of life can be tested through science. Science has no place in understanding a god or goddess unless you see them as aspects of nature.So, tell the difference between finding cause of creation vs finding God.
What about scientists ? they are NOT methodology.
Individual scientists believe what they will outside their discipline.Op asks the difference between, NOT the relationship between.
How are you getting that? There's no evidence for God, and science doesn't believe in magic.Well this also confirms that scientists believe in God.
Please tell the difference between, NOT the relationship between.It depends. If you are talking about a creation story then we are talking about myth, If you are talking about how life came to be on the Earth then you have the methodology of science that helps understand how nature works and our connection with it. If you are talking about a god or goddess then you are talking about a personal belief. Myths and personal beliefs cannot be tested with the scientific method. How nature works and how we came into existence and our relationship to the rest of life can be tested through science. Science has no place in understanding a god or goddess unless you see them as aspects of nature.
Then, tell the difference between finding cause of creation vs finding God.How are you getting that? There's no evidence for God, and science doesn't believe in magic.
NOT asking how science works.Individual scientists believe what they will outside their discipline.
The OP? Science believes what it observes or finds evidence of. As soon as it finds evidence of God it'll believe in God.
Science has no reason to expect an invisible magician. So far it's never found magic to be the cause of anything. It works on the premise that there's a natural explanation for everything.
Science can't investigate the inexplicable. Magic is inexplicable.