• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can invisible sword kill a devil?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Look, how they fight the evil UFO in the final scene of "Fifth Element"


If there is visible matter, then there shall be an invisible matter.
Latter does not interact with visible matter even by gravity, because
"gravity is not a force" (Albert Einstein). However, the invisible
matter acts on the grid of spacetime, and so, it influences the motion
of visible matter (e.g., stars in the galaxies). I call it "Dark Matter".
The Dark Matter does not interact with our world at all, because the
underground Dark Matter detectors have not reported the signal.
So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).

All my words are proven using mathematics:
Gravity Law Without Universalism is Solving Many Tasks, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2007.0112
because I follow the "principle of sufficient reason"
(see it in Wikipedia).

Objection: "Can you measure the soul, the love? For example, measure
moral qualities in hertz or volts?" In reply to it, the DEFINITION:
Nature is what human observes (using Instruments like a clock, meter,
thermometer), and human is the one who observes nature.
If we equate humans and nature, we will destroy the definition of both
nature and humans. Therefore, spiritual things are not being measured
by physical instruments.

TO ONES, WHO LIKE TO TROLL ME:

The goal "to find mistakes" could be a bad attitude. The final goal should
be to enjoy reading the publication. If flaws are seen, they must be reported.
However, this report should be given without any laughs and sadistic enjoyment.
Instead, the flaws should be reported with some sadness. Finding mistakes is
not the aim of science, but an unpleasant byproduct. The more you look for
mistakes, the more fake mistakes are found: you only get what you desire to
get. For example, they told Jesus Christ that it is His mistake to believe in
His Divine Father. So, they looked at the perfect Human and found a fake
mistake. A fake mistake is what is seen as a mistake, but is not.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Look, how they fight the evil UFO in the final scene of "Fifth Element"


If there is visible matter, then there shall be an invisible matter.
Latter does not interact with visible matter even by gravity, because
"gravity is not a force" (Albert Einstein). However, the invisible
matter acts on the grid of spacetime, and so, it influences the motion
of visible matter (e.g., stars in the galaxies). I call it "Dark Matter".
The Dark Matter does not interact with our world at all, because the
underground Dark Matter detectors have not reported the signal.
So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).

All my words are proven using mathematics:
Gravity Law Without Universalism is Solving Many Tasks, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2007.0112
because I follow the "principle of sufficient reason"
(see it in Wikipedia).

Objection: "Can you measure the soul, the love? For example, measure
moral qualities in hertz or volts?" In reply to it, the DEFINITION:
Nature is what human observes (using Instruments like a clock, meter,
thermometer), and human is the one who observes nature.
If we equate humans and nature, we will destroy the definition of both
nature and humans. Therefore, spiritual things are not being measured
by physical instruments.

TO ONES, WHO LIKE TO TROLL ME:

The goal "to find mistakes" could be a bad attitude. The final goal should
be to enjoy reading the publication. If flaws are seen, they must be reported.
However, this report should be given without any laughs and sadistic enjoyment.
Instead, the flaws should be reported with some sadness. Finding mistakes is
not the aim of science, but an unpleasant byproduct. The more you look for
mistakes, the more fake mistakes are found: you only get what you desire to
get. For example, they told Jesus Christ that it is His mistake to believe in
His Divine Father. So, they looked at the perfect Human and found a fake
mistake. A fake mistake is what is seen as a mistake, but is not.
Do you put your self in the shoes of Jesus and say you are treated just like him, because you can not get your paper published?
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
Look, how they fight the evil UFO in the final scene of "Fifth Element"


If there is visible matter, then there shall be an invisible matter.
Latter does not interact with visible matter even by gravity, because
"gravity is not a force" (Albert Einstein). However, the invisible
matter acts on the grid of spacetime, and so, it influences the motion
of visible matter (e.g., stars in the galaxies). I call it "Dark Matter".
The Dark Matter does not interact with our world at all, because the
underground Dark Matter detectors have not reported the signal.
So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).

All my words are proven using mathematics:
Gravity Law Without Universalism is Solving Many Tasks, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2007.0112
because I follow the "principle of sufficient reason"
(see it in Wikipedia).

Objection: "Can you measure the soul, the love? For example, measure
moral qualities in hertz or volts?" In reply to it, the DEFINITION:
Nature is what human observes (using Instruments like a clock, meter,
thermometer), and human is the one who observes nature.
If we equate humans and nature, we will destroy the definition of both
nature and humans. Therefore, spiritual things are not being measured
by physical instruments.

TO ONES, WHO LIKE TO TROLL ME:

The goal "to find mistakes" could be a bad attitude. The final goal should
be to enjoy reading the publication. If flaws are seen, they must be reported.
However, this report should be given without any laughs and sadistic enjoyment.
Instead, the flaws should be reported with some sadness. Finding mistakes is
not the aim of science, but an unpleasant byproduct. The more you look for
mistakes, the more fake mistakes are found: you only get what you desire to
get. For example, they told Jesus Christ that it is His mistake to believe in
His Divine Father. So, they looked at the perfect Human and found a fake
mistake. A fake mistake is what is seen as a mistake, but is not.

So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).


If the above is an example of how you have 'proven' your claims with mathematics, I understand why you can't get anything published in any respected scientific journal.

Just because there is something we call dark matter that science cannot yet detect or 'invisible matter' as you call it, does NOT mean you can assert that you've somehow 'proven' that anything you claim exists in the 'invisible world' actually exists. That is NOT how proof works.

Your logic doesn't even pass scrutiny on an open forum Website, so you shouldn't be surprised that it's rejected by people who run respected scientific journals.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).


If the above is an example of how you have 'proven' your claims with mathematics, I understand why you can't get anything published in any respected scientific journal.

Just because there is something we call dark matter that science cannot yet detect or 'invisible matter' as you call it, does NOT mean you can assert that you've somehow 'proven' that anything you claim exists in the 'invisible world' actually exists. That is NOT how proof works.

Your logic doesn't even pass scrutiny on an open forum Website, so you shouldn't be surprised that it's rejected by people who run respected scientific journals.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Look, how they fight the evil UFO in the final scene of "Fifth Element"


If there is visible matter, then there shall be an invisible matter.
Latter does not interact with visible matter even by gravity, because
"gravity is not a force" (Albert Einstein). However, the invisible
matter acts on the grid of spacetime, and so, it influences the motion
of visible matter (e.g., stars in the galaxies). I call it "Dark Matter".
The Dark Matter does not interact with our world at all, because the
underground Dark Matter detectors have not reported the signal.
So, the invisible matter proves the existence of the invisible world
(e.g., angels, human souls, spirits; devil, satan).

All my words are proven using mathematics:
Gravity Law Without Universalism is Solving Many Tasks, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2007.0112
because I follow the "principle of sufficient reason"
(see it in Wikipedia).

Objection: "Can you measure the soul, the love? For example, measure
moral qualities in hertz or volts?" In reply to it, the DEFINITION:
Nature is what human observes (using Instruments like a clock, meter,
thermometer), and human is the one who observes nature.
If we equate humans and nature, we will destroy the definition of both
nature and humans. Therefore, spiritual things are not being measured
by physical instruments.

TO ONES, WHO LIKE TO TROLL ME:

The goal "to find mistakes" could be a bad attitude. The final goal should
be to enjoy reading the publication. If flaws are seen, they must be reported.
However, this report should be given without any laughs and sadistic enjoyment.
Instead, the flaws should be reported with some sadness. Finding mistakes is
not the aim of science, but an unpleasant byproduct. The more you look for
mistakes, the more fake mistakes are found: you only get what you desire to
get. For example, they told Jesus Christ that it is His mistake to believe in
His Divine Father. So, they looked at the perfect Human and found a fake
mistake. A fake mistake is what is seen as a mistake, but is not.

Your brain on love: A chemical high - CNN

There is no reason to think that love is anything more than a psychological response.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
If sending videos like this in response to criticisms about your claims is how you respond to scientific journals... are you honestly surprised that they don't take you seriously?
The song is about my worldview:
1. "I have a dream" (quote from the song) of a better world, the one which will publish my papers,
2. "I believe in angels", and I study their matter - Dark Matter.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Psycho-logy: psycho = soul, logy = science. How come, that an atheist believes in a soul?

Soul or psyche (Ancient Greek: ψυχή psykhḗ, of ψύχειν psýkhein, "to breathe") comprises the mental abilities of a living being: reason, character, feeling, consciousness, memory, perception, thinking, etc.

Soul as I see it is the "mind". The central nervous system along with all of the information it stores.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Soul or psyche (Ancient Greek: ψυχή psykhḗ, of ψύχειν psýkhein, "to breathe") comprises the mental abilities of a living being: reason, character, feeling, consciousness, memory, perception, thinking, etc.

Soul as I see it is the "mind". The central nervous system along with all of the information it stores.
The real atheist will not believe in a soul. Have you ever seen word soul in a Physics journal?
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
The song is about my worldview:
1. "I have a dream" (quote from the song) of a better world, the one which will publish my papers,
2. "I believe in angels", and I study their matter - Dark Matter.

There is self-publishing, if you think it is that important. If you want something scientifically published, I wouldn't hold your breath.

However, there are even online resources for that.
7 steps to publishing in a scientific journal
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
The real atheist will not believe in a soul. Have you ever seen word soul in a Physics journal?

Do you understand what the word atheist means?

Other than saying we lack a belief about God it really doesn't define anything else about us.

It's your mind that connects soul and God. I can believe whatever I want about the soul and still not have a belief about God.
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
The song is about my worldview:
1. "I have a dream" (quote from the song) of a better world, the one which will publish my papers,
2. "I believe in angels", and I study their matter - Dark Matter.

How nice that this video reflects your worldview. Of course it does absolutely NOTHING to address the logical fallacies in your claim that just because there's evidence of matter that is essentially invisible that it's somehow PROOF that any fantastical invisible entity you can imagine is ALSO real.

You insist that you have mathematical PROOF for what you say, but clearly you don't even have the slightest clue as to what proof actually is.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
I can believe whatever I want about the soul and still not have a belief about God.
If so, even satan can be an atheist. Even theist can be atheist. The contradiction is detected. To be atheist is easy these last days, isn't it? Quote: "it's a crazy world out there" (song "It's almost unreal").

There is self-publishing
I am not a madonna or Hawking: nobody will read me.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
If so, even satan can be an atheist. Even theist can be atheist. The contradiction is detected. To be atheist is easy these last days, isn't it? Quote: "it's a crazy world out there" (song "It's almost unreal").

To be an atheist is to be honest. It is a confession of being ignorant about God.

I am not a madonna or Hawking: nobody will read me.

It's not up to you who reads you or Hawking for that matter. What is up to us is the accuracy of what we write.
 
Top