No, I saw no inconsistency in your application.It seemed like you were implying there were some sort of discrepancy or inconsistency with my definition or usage.
I'm just taking it further.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I saw no inconsistency in your application.It seemed like you were implying there were some sort of discrepancy or inconsistency with my definition or usage.
Your president is making deals with the Taliban's ally and financial backer. You don't see a problem with this?About the same as my opinion of Hanoi Jane.
But I see your thought(?) process in asking the question. However, the last time I checked we were and are not trying to make economic deals with the Taliban, or any of the terrorist groups in the last few years, therefore your question is a moot point.
Squirming a little bit it seems. Try your disingenuous posting on someone else. I have better things to do than enable your ego.Your president is making deals with the Taliban's ally and financial backer. You don't see a problem with this?
I thought Beau made some good points,
Something in the news points to my not being so deludedI said nothing about Trump being a Russian agent. At issue is Trump's subservience to Putin.
If you truly maintain that such subservience is no more real than talk of "Obama being a Muslim or Marxist infiltrator," then I'll leave you to your delusions.
I kinda suspected Russia didn't have to pay bounties against U.S.troops in order to incentive the Taliban to kill U.S.soldiers, when after-all the Taliban has been willing to do that for less than a drop of a hat.Something in the news points to my not being so deluded
in my skepticism of unsupported claims of bounties.
U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops
Excerpted....
But on Thursday, the Biden administration announced that U.S. intelligence only had “low to moderate” confidence in the story after all. Translated from the jargon of spyworld, that means the intelligence agencies have found the story is, at best, unproven—and possibly untrue.
Hatred of Trump seems to cause unbridled belief
in anything negative about him....a delusion, eh.