You cannot produce the quote or link to it then that you are griping about.
Let's have honest debate in this thread. Bye bye.
POST #1
And you know it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You cannot produce the quote or link to it then that you are griping about.
Let's have honest debate in this thread. Bye bye.
In other words the OP. Great, that narrows it down. Something in the quotes there you disagree with.POST #1
And you know it.
In other words the OP. Great, that narrows it down. Something in the quotes there you disagree with.
Should I guess?
The guy mentioned a trillionth of a second, was that it? It was exponentially more ore less imaginary time? Ha.
No idea what you are babbling about. You are not welcome to continue to post dishonestly though. If any other poster knows the issue with the article that Christinem is talking about, let us know.I have shown the problem, you mocked my response. You want to debate then debate and stop playing the ignorant fool stomping your foot because you realise you are out of your depth but dont have the integrity to be honest about it.
This is not the first or even the second time you have played you silly games when your posturing fails, it won't be happening again, welcome to my very select ignore list
Didn´t you just undermined your own religious beliefs with this statement?All of what you think you know is belief based. Belief is not knowing.
Not at all. When a belief system is presented as science it is evil.Didn´t you just undermined your own religious beliefs with this statement?
You never met Isaiah, why slander him by calling him names? If you are referring to the believer who posted Scripture, or any other believer that ever lived...they are blessed.Ah, the delusional, egotistical view of one who believes he has been blessed by God.
Not at all. When a belief system is presented as science it is evil.
Ah, the delusional, egotistical view of one who believes he has been blessed by God.
You never met Isaiah, why slander him by calling him names?
I did, and here is what I came up with.ok....I skipped most of this....because....
the universe is expanding
reverse that motion and it all comes back to a single location
at the 'point' of the primordial singularity the numbers run off the chalkboard
and paradoxically……..resulting in......nothing
nada
zip
all that we 'know'.....
in one location
think about it
When I read what you said "delusional, egotistical view" I find that ignorant and slanderous when applied to God's word.I didn't call him names. I referred to his stated worldview. Are you suggesting that Isiah did not say the things you quoted him as saying?
Science can't be twisted. So called science is a twisted pile of fables and it can be and is twisted. Real knowledge is fine. The origins sciences (paleo this and that, geology for the most part, cosmology, evolutionary biology, etc etc etc) are NOT knowledge or real sciences.When science is twisted to accommodate a belief system, that is really evil. Right, Dad?
Do you ascribe to the idea that everything on the internet is right?So the article is wrong?
I ascribe to the idea that if someone wants to correct a science article, that is fine. One should tell us the part they are correcting, as well as explain why the correction was needed. If a poster whines and insults for several posts, beating around the bush and avoiding honest debate, well, good riddance.Do you ascribe to the idea that everything on the internet is right?
not buying any of thatI did, and here is what I came up with.
The earth was created first as well as what we call space. Then the rest of what we call the universe was created. The stars were made in that expanse. Part of the reason stars were made was for earth people to be able to mark time. Possibly there is an even greater connection in regulating time with the stars also. There is also a spiritual connection. Certain star groups are associated with various spirits. Possibly some of the fallen angels that live out there as we speak dwell in the various areas where these star groups are. (they will all be made to come down to live in earth soon)
So the origin and true nature of stars is completely different that the models science has concocted based on faith alone.
What could cause red shifting of light in deep space is very different from what caused light shifting here near earth. WE don't know what all causes it. Possibly time itself changes as we move away from earth, and that could cause red shifting..or...etc etc.
The idea of the universe expanding at a certain rate now is faith based and of course, so is the notion that it must have been a little tiny hot soup speck at one time!
No problem. Believe what you like. Remember, it is a belief, not actual science when it comes to all origin issues.not buying any of that
I thought I was pretty clear.I ascribe to the idea that if someone wants to correct a science article, that is fine. One should tell us the part they are correcting, as well as explain why the correction was needed. If a poster whines and insults for several posts, beating around the bush and avoiding honest debate, well, good riddance.
Read for comprehension.I thought I was pretty clear.