• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Big Bang in Trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

dad

Undefeated
POST #1

And you know it.
In other words the OP. Great, that narrows it down. Something in the quotes there you disagree with.

Should I guess?

The guy mentioned a trillionth of a second, was that it? It was exponentially more ore less imaginary time? Ha.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
In other words the OP. Great, that narrows it down. Something in the quotes there you disagree with.

Should I guess?

The guy mentioned a trillionth of a second, was that it? It was exponentially more ore less imaginary time? Ha.


You know what we have been discussing, stop being stilly just because you failed
 

dad

Undefeated
I have shown the problem, you mocked my response. You want to debate then debate and stop playing the ignorant fool stomping your foot because you realise you are out of your depth but dont have the integrity to be honest about it.

This is not the first or even the second time you have played you silly games when your posturing fails, it won't be happening again, welcome to my very select ignore list
No idea what you are babbling about. You are not welcome to continue to post dishonestly though. If any other poster knows the issue with the article that Christinem is talking about, let us know.
 
Last edited:

dad

Undefeated
Ah, the delusional, egotistical view of one who believes he has been blessed by God.
You never met Isaiah, why slander him by calling him names? If you are referring to the believer who posted Scripture, or any other believer that ever lived...they are blessed.
By not accepting so called science we get that extra blessing! Ps 1:1
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
ok....I skipped most of this....because....

the universe is expanding

reverse that motion and it all comes back to a single location

at the 'point' of the primordial singularity the numbers run off the chalkboard

and paradoxically……..resulting in......nothing
nada
zip

all that we 'know'.....
in one location

think about it
 

dad

Undefeated
ok....I skipped most of this....because....

the universe is expanding

reverse that motion and it all comes back to a single location

at the 'point' of the primordial singularity the numbers run off the chalkboard

and paradoxically……..resulting in......nothing
nada
zip

all that we 'know'.....
in one location

think about it
I did, and here is what I came up with.

The earth was created first as well as what we call space. Then the rest of what we call the universe was created. The stars were made in that expanse. Part of the reason stars were made was for earth people to be able to mark time. Possibly there is an even greater connection in regulating time with the stars also. There is also a spiritual connection. Certain star groups are associated with various spirits. Possibly some of the fallen angels that live out there as we speak dwell in the various areas where these star groups are. (they will all be made to come down to live in earth soon)

So the origin and true nature of stars is completely different that the models science has concocted based on faith alone.

What could cause red shifting of light in deep space is very different from what caused light shifting here near earth. WE don't know what all causes it. Possibly time itself changes as we move away from earth, and that could cause red shifting..or...etc etc.

The idea of the universe expanding at a certain rate now is faith based and of course, so is the notion that it must have been a little tiny hot soup speck at one time!
 

dad

Undefeated
I didn't call him names. I referred to his stated worldview. Are you suggesting that Isiah did not say the things you quoted him as saying?
When I read what you said "delusional, egotistical view" I find that ignorant and slanderous when applied to God's word.
 

dad

Undefeated
When science is twisted to accommodate a belief system, that is really evil. Right, Dad?
Science can't be twisted. So called science is a twisted pile of fables and it can be and is twisted. Real knowledge is fine. The origins sciences (paleo this and that, geology for the most part, cosmology, evolutionary biology, etc etc etc) are NOT knowledge or real sciences.
 

dad

Undefeated
Do you ascribe to the idea that everything on the internet is right?
I ascribe to the idea that if someone wants to correct a science article, that is fine. One should tell us the part they are correcting, as well as explain why the correction was needed. If a poster whines and insults for several posts, beating around the bush and avoiding honest debate, well, good riddance.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I did, and here is what I came up with.

The earth was created first as well as what we call space. Then the rest of what we call the universe was created. The stars were made in that expanse. Part of the reason stars were made was for earth people to be able to mark time. Possibly there is an even greater connection in regulating time with the stars also. There is also a spiritual connection. Certain star groups are associated with various spirits. Possibly some of the fallen angels that live out there as we speak dwell in the various areas where these star groups are. (they will all be made to come down to live in earth soon)

So the origin and true nature of stars is completely different that the models science has concocted based on faith alone.

What could cause red shifting of light in deep space is very different from what caused light shifting here near earth. WE don't know what all causes it. Possibly time itself changes as we move away from earth, and that could cause red shifting..or...etc etc.

The idea of the universe expanding at a certain rate now is faith based and of course, so is the notion that it must have been a little tiny hot soup speck at one time!
not buying any of that
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
I ascribe to the idea that if someone wants to correct a science article, that is fine. One should tell us the part they are correcting, as well as explain why the correction was needed. If a poster whines and insults for several posts, beating around the bush and avoiding honest debate, well, good riddance.
I thought I was pretty clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top