Big Bang in Trouble

[Revoltingest]

Ah, now you try to smear other beliefs as some excuse for your own failure.

Uh oh....looks like I've been found out.

 

[dad]

I am citing your complete misunderstanding of scientific notation

So you talk about "time elapsed" and when asked for specifics, you blather about notation? Not sure why you bother posting.

 

[dad]

Uh oh....looks like I've been found out.

That is always a danger when there is light shed on stuff.

 

[ratiocinator]

Why wade through the article? I picked out the gems already.

That's funny. You skimmed it from your position total ignorance of the subject (and science in general, for that matter) and picked out the bits you thought would bolster your blind faith in old myths.

 

[dad]

That's funny. You skimmed it from your position total ignorance of the subject (and science in general, for that matter) and picked out the bits you thought would bolster your blind faith in old myths.

No. The article was all about an area of the BB theory that could be called into question.
Now you seem to want to call others ignorant rather than admitting you know almost nothing as the article says.
I find all areas of the BB theory to be faith based. It is amusing when they admit knowing almost nothing about a crucial part of the BB series of events.

It is also amusing watching some folks squirm here.

 

[ChristineM]

So you talk about "time elapsed" and when asked for specifics, you blather about notation? Not sure why you bother posting.

You are the one who created the thread, you are the one who embarrassed yourself making untrue claims that were easily refuted. You want to play cosmology then you need to know what you are talking about or why bother posting except to highlight ignorance?

 

[viole]

So you can't dispute knowing almost nothing, but you try to project the same disease to other beliefs.

I could defend how Scripture is based on knowledge and history and eyewitnesses, experience etc etc. But that is another thread. Once we see you admit knowing almost nothing about your own fable here, we are done.

Well, I know a lot about Pinocchio. So, we can conclude that we both know well at least one work of fiction. Actually I know at least two, since I used to be a Christian myself.

ciao

- viole

 

[ratiocinator]

Now you seem to want to call others ignorant rather than admitting you know almost nothing as the article says.

The article doesn't say we know almost nothing, it says we know almost nothing about very specific aspects of the model we have. We do know, from real evidence, a great deal about how the universe has behaved over the last 13 billion years or so, and nothing in the article calls that into question.

 

[dad]

You are the one who created the thread, you are the one who embarrassed yourself making untrue claims that were easily refuted. You want to play cosmology then you need to know what you are talking about or why bother posting except to highlight ignorance?

Stop embarrassing yourself with untrue claims The OP was clear.

 

[dad]

Well, I know a lot about Pinocchio. So, we can conclude that we both know well at least one work of fiction. Actually I know at least two, since I used to be a Christian myself.

ciao

- viole

Thanks for sharing the scope of your knowledge.

 

[dad]

The article doesn't say we know almost nothing, it says we know almost nothing about very specific aspects of the model we have. We do know, from real evidence, a great deal about how the universe has behaved over the last 13 billion years or so, and nothing in the article calls that into question.

The articles does say you know almost nothing about the key aspect of the BB theory. I already posted the quotes. Despite you claiming you know a great deal. No way. All of what you think you know is belief based. Belief is not knowing.

 

[ChristineM]

Stop embarrassing yourself with untrue claims The OP was clear.

You were not, you made nonsense claims and then mocked the corrections and you know it but are too embarrassed to admit it

 

[ChristineM]

The articles does say you know almost nothing about the key aspect of the BB theory. I already posted the quotes. Despite you claiming you know a great deal. No way. All of what you think you know is belief based. Belief is not knowing.

Except that you omitted the KEY ASPECTS bit. I wonder why?

 

[ratiocinator]

The articles does say you know almost nothing about the key aspect of the BB theory. I already posted the quotes.

Yes but the problem is that you know so little that you think that means that the whole timeline is in question, which it isn't.

Despite you claiming you know a great deal. No way.

Assertion from a position of ignorance.

All of what you think you know is belief based. Belief is not knowing.

Says the guy with zero evidence, no knowledge of the subject, and blind faith belief in a book of myths.

 

[dad]

You were not, you made nonsense claims and then mocked the corrections and you know it but are too embarrassed to admit it

Please stop the blather and address issues if you would like to be welcome in the thread.

 

[dad]

Except that you omitted the KEY ASPECTS bit. I wonder why?

One of the very key aspects of the BB theory is getting the little soup to grow fast into what becomes the universe actually. This is news?

 

[dad]

Yes but the problem is that you know so little that you think that means that the whole timeline is in question, which it isn't.

Why would I care about an imaginary timeline?? Seriously?
The issue here is that science admits knowing almost nothing about a very important part of the BB theory.

Says the guy with zero evidence, no knowledge of the subject, and blind faith belief in a book of myths.

I understand why you would resort to insults.

 

[ChristineM]

Please stop the blather and address issues if you would like to be welcome in the thread.

The issue is that you messed up.

 

[ChristineM]

One of the very key aspects of the BB theory is getting the little soup to grow fast into what becomes the universe actually. This is news?

Cherry picking then throwing in a strawman, you really are struggling

 

[dad]

The issue is that you messed up.

Cite the post. Tell us what you think someone 'messed up' about? Ha