God's existence is so big, nothing can exist with it or on par with it, it's high realm it is alone. This is what we are basically saying by Tahleel (only one God). God's Existence is not just so big that it happens there is no gods with God, it's that he so big, that there cannot be any possibility of a god with God.
Why is it that God's Existence is downgraded if he has something with it's Exact properties? Well, because Existence absolute amount of it, is such nothing can be beside it.
When we think of absolute existence, it's as such that if it exists, it would be the type that is Necessary. If It's necessary, just as we can know it is good, we can see it being necessary by just recalling it and seeing greatness is such that it's absolute and covers existence absolutely to the extent it definitely is necessary.
Thus when we recall Ultimate possible being we see the actual being existing and CANNOT conceive of it not existing or possibly existing or not existing, it is rather seen to exist necessarily. The reason is because ultimate existence is such that it covers all existence including reality as is, and is in fact so big, that reality of it's existence covers all possible existence.
The existence by which it covers all existence, a life that covers all life, is such that it's impossible to see this being and not see it exists.
Any possibly conception of a god that doesn't get this attribute of being necessary type existence, is a lesser god then the God that is necessary. Give all attributes like goodness, love, etc, but not being necessary type existence, it would fall short of being absolute being. Therefore, the true God can only be seen to exist and cannot be imagined not to exist, for by sheer recalling it is necessary, it is known to exist.
Anselm and Descartes both arguments were sound. Not only are they sound, but Tawhid only makes sense if they are sound. That is if they are not sound arguments, then Tawheed doesn't make sense either.
Tawheed (Oneness of God) was never about counting that there is One God only, but to see the Absolute Eternal Being is One such that it covers all existence and all greatness and all treasures and all possible life and power and glory and beauty.
This level if we conceive of the idea of that God - we recall instantly it not only exists, but cannot but exist, necessarily, that is no possible world can be free from it and that everything depends on it.
It is full container by which all things depend upon (Samad) such that existence is so full in it, no existence can exist but dependent on it, no existence can exist with it, and existence of it cannot be conceived to not exist.
If you an imagine a god that may or may not exist, that's lacking the absolute necessary level of existence which is absolute and hence not only exists, but cannot but exist.
Why is it that God's Existence is downgraded if he has something with it's Exact properties? Well, because Existence absolute amount of it, is such nothing can be beside it.
When we think of absolute existence, it's as such that if it exists, it would be the type that is Necessary. If It's necessary, just as we can know it is good, we can see it being necessary by just recalling it and seeing greatness is such that it's absolute and covers existence absolutely to the extent it definitely is necessary.
Thus when we recall Ultimate possible being we see the actual being existing and CANNOT conceive of it not existing or possibly existing or not existing, it is rather seen to exist necessarily. The reason is because ultimate existence is such that it covers all existence including reality as is, and is in fact so big, that reality of it's existence covers all possible existence.
The existence by which it covers all existence, a life that covers all life, is such that it's impossible to see this being and not see it exists.
Any possibly conception of a god that doesn't get this attribute of being necessary type existence, is a lesser god then the God that is necessary. Give all attributes like goodness, love, etc, but not being necessary type existence, it would fall short of being absolute being. Therefore, the true God can only be seen to exist and cannot be imagined not to exist, for by sheer recalling it is necessary, it is known to exist.
Anselm and Descartes both arguments were sound. Not only are they sound, but Tawhid only makes sense if they are sound. That is if they are not sound arguments, then Tawheed doesn't make sense either.
Tawheed (Oneness of God) was never about counting that there is One God only, but to see the Absolute Eternal Being is One such that it covers all existence and all greatness and all treasures and all possible life and power and glory and beauty.
This level if we conceive of the idea of that God - we recall instantly it not only exists, but cannot but exist, necessarily, that is no possible world can be free from it and that everything depends on it.
It is full container by which all things depend upon (Samad) such that existence is so full in it, no existence can exist but dependent on it, no existence can exist with it, and existence of it cannot be conceived to not exist.
If you an imagine a god that may or may not exist, that's lacking the absolute necessary level of existence which is absolute and hence not only exists, but cannot but exist.