The science of our physical existence is indeed based predictive theories and hypothesis and the facts. To propose anything creates contradictions that cannot be resolved and still fit the evidence. You have not coherently reponded to the fatual nature of science.
Subjective claims of truth are too variable from different religious perspective to be remotely real nor consistent with the evidence.
Strictly one of many different conflicting interpretations among Christians.
False Genesis does not remotely give a consistent sequence of events. Where are the many ice ages?
Genesis does not fit the geologic sequence of events.
Last year you did nothing of the sort. This is absolutely not true and an unethical dishonest claim, which I previous shot done in previous threads with references. The most likely places for the earlies life to form is in coastal tidal regions close to volcanics and the early mid ocean ridges. You are selectively parcial citing possibilities where there is no consensus that you claim.
You did falsely claim this without scientific evidence. Nothing more than ENRON creative unethical statistics used by Creationists, and not science.
Yes, in 2019 a consensus was reached that life could not form in oceans.
Why? Something about the
dilution of organics in ocean waters
concentrations of salt which harm biological chemistry
inability to concentrate organics like wetting and drying can
there could be other points, can't remember them now.
There was no "tidal" in the early days, in as much as there
were no shore lines to show the rising and falling of the ocean.
Yes, no ice ages, no volcanism, no meteoritic impacts, no super-nova pulses,
no solar events, no collision of Thea to form the moon, no hyper-gas events,
no Decan Traps, no global tsunamis... and I am sure there could have been
a zillion weird events which happened - how about "strange matter" punching
through the earth and orbiting the earth's core?
The bible is a theological book. - it preaches God. The first account in Genesis
gives the reader an overview of it all. First the heavens, then a dark oceanic
world, then light, then land, then life on land and finally life in the sea. That's
good enough to me. It's good enough for a summary of science too.
