-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
An open challenge to evolutionists.
- Thread starter Iymus
- Start date
Use your words, please.
Iymus
Active Member
Rational Agnostic
Well-Known Member
Iymus
Active Member
Using drugs is a sin, kid.
transgression of law of evolutionist?
Oh, this is easy.
I can identify both.
1) Self-drilling self-tapping flat head #2 phillips 1/4-20 machine screw
It's an unusual variant of a flat head because the larger head diameter is more like a truss head.
2) #2 phillips head screwdriver
Last edited:
You just want a definition of evolution? Or something else?
You appear to be able to read and write. why can't you read up on this topic on your own?
OTOH, if you have a more specific point you want to debate, trot it out!
Iymus
Active Member
Proof that Evolution predates Creationism therefore invalidating it.
I'm not sure what you're trying to ask, but I think you'll find that the answers to common Creationist questions can be all found here:
An Index to Creationist Claims
We came up with the theory of evolution after Creationism was invented. Is that what you mean?
Iymus
Active Member
Altfish
Veteran Member
Essentially Explain concept of Evolution "if valid" preceding Creationism.
This is weirdly phrased. If you're just looking for evidence of evolution, here's some:
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent
Or you could take a biology class at a local university, that way you could ask the professor if you have questions.
Iymus
Active Member
Whether or not Evolution has any validity to it or not, I do not believe it would predate or is before Creationism.
Meaning I believe if Evolution contradicts Creationism then Evolution is an invalid theory or what one would call something that is false.
I normally don't get into Creationism and Evolution debates this entire post is just my response to
An Open Challenge To Creationists
Meaning I believe if Evolution contradicts Creationism then Evolution is an invalid theory or what one would call something that is false.
I normally don't get into Creationism and Evolution debates this entire post is just my response to
An Open Challenge To Creationists
Iymus
Active Member
Evolution seemingly may have specks of truth or unleavened bread in it, and since I don't know the full mechanics of Creationism; I do not think I am able to distinguish all of the tares from the wheat in it.
Erebus
Well-Known Member
That's an unusual perspective. Do you also hold that miasma theory is more valid than germ theory? Miasma theory predates germ theory after all.
The answer is and will be invalid. Evolution only occur in organisms. So even if organisms were created by a deity, evolution comes after. It's not about the creation and/or origin of life, instead, it's about the changes of organisms.
Iymus
Active Member
Normally when I see Evolution used it is to contradict Creationism.
In Evolution theory it seems everything is coincidental randomness, and changes within living / non living and organic / non organic material, over time.