For Christians. Was the flood real or just a myth?

[Audie]

Like on the banks of the Nile or Tigris and Euphrates?

I think you are just being tiresome now.

I said MAY.

IN THE EVENT, the quote "global catastrophe that destroyed the pre-Flood world, reshaped the continents"
does not refer to some middle eastern flood plain.

 

[sooda]

I think you are just being tiresome now.

I said MAY.

IN THE EVENT, the quote "global catastrophe that destroyed the pre-Flood world, reshaped the continents"
does not refer to some middle eastern flood plain.

Flood sediment doesn't equal rock strata in 3000 years.

 

[Audie]

Flood sediment doesn't equal rock strata in 3000 years.

Remember in the old days I said you are being tiresome?

The quote is about a stupid thing that people believe.
All of it is stupid. Not just t he rock layer bit.
But the quote is about a belief. One that involves magic.
Not reality. In magic these things can happen.

As for whether fresh strata could become lithified
in 3000 years, i kind of think in some cases it could.

AND btw this is not correct.

"No flood ever laid down rock layers."

Unless you wish to go further into silly semantics,
which you will have to do on your own.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Claiming that you know what forces and laws existed on earth in the beginning without providing the support is no better than saying the Spaghetti Monster did it.

You'ld have a point if the Spaghetti Monster were independently testable and verifiable, but it isn't so you don't.

Denying the spiritual as well as Scripture and historical records of the past for no reason is akin to Last Thursdayism.

I don't think I've ever met someone who projects his own flaws on others as much as you do.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Sorry, I am a little rusty on those rules was Blasphemy or spamming number one?

It's about understanding what is and isn't evidence.

Beliefs based on proven records and experiences and tests are evidence

No, they are not.

 

[dad]

You'ld have a point if the Spaghetti Monster were independently testable and verifiable, but it isn't so you don't.

You have not verified the nature of the past you claim.

 

[dad]

It's about understanding what is and isn't evidence.

Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So when he posts endless spam and blasphemy (and cannot even link to where he claims evidence was posted) that is what we need to understand as evidence. Got it.

 

[BeesAir7]

What was written about the flood is get the humans off the planet, humans are disease

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You have not verified the nature of the past you claim.

Science does, every day.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So when he posts endless spam and blasphemy (and cannot even link to where he claims evidence was posted) that is what we need to understand as evidence. Got it.

No.

 

[dad]

Science does, every day.

Science cannot and never has or will.

 

[dad]

No.

No problem, feel free to follow close to his tailgate I guess.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Science cannot and never has or will.

 

[dad]

View attachment 37056

We get it. You want us to believe accept your beliefs or get called names. Very mature.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

We get it. You want us to believe accept your beliefs or get called names. Very mature.

Projecting again.

 

[dad]

Projecting again.

Admitting beliefs is a good thing. Pretending your beliefs are anything else is a bad thing.

 

[james dixon]

Not that you needed another detail, but "god"
had to have removed all the evidence for the flood,
for lo, none is to be found. (I never did find a fundy, btw, who even tries to
explain why no "flood{ sediment is found in the
deep ocean basins.)

Because it was already flooded. Has been flooded since the beginning
of the flood; or so it was
As I se it -

 

[dad]

(I never did find a fundy, btw, who even tries to
explain why no "flood{ sediment is found in the
deep ocean basins.)

The continents separated after the flood, so oceans as we know them would be post flood.